Advertisement

A Decision Support System Using Analytical Hierarchy Process for Student-Teacher-Industry Expectation Perspective

  • S. S. Pawar
  • R. R. Rathod
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 810)

Abstract

Communication gap between expectations or requirements of student, teacher and industry is major issue for every engineering institute as well as for nation. It is necessary to make engineering or professional students skilled and employable for industries. Therefore, there is a need of proper understanding between student, teacher and industry with respect to various skills and making them aware of various engineering, professional and management practices and methodologies. The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) of Government of India (GoI) provides ranks for institutes based on various parameters however the proposed study focuses on common perspectives of student-teacher and industry for better employability, understandings and interactions. One of the parameter ‘Graduation Outcomes’ of NIRF has been used in present study. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been applied to identify common perspective on expectations (POE) of Student, Teacher and Industry (S-T-I) for bridging the perspective gap using S-T-I survey data. The obtained result shows that there is a gap in expectations for few identified criterias among S-T-I. However these gaps can be minimized by increasing communication among S-T-I’s.

Keywords

Analytical hierarchy process Criterias 

References

  1. 1.
    www.nirfindia.org. Accessed 01 Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    Wakabayashi, T., Itoh, K., Mitamura, T., Ohuchi, A.: A framework of an analytic hierarchy process method based on\nordinal scale. In: Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Fuzzy Systems. pp. 355–360 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saaty, R.W.: The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math. Model 9, 161–176 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Triantaphyllou, E., Mann, S.H.: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in Engineering Applications: Some Challenges. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Theory Appl. Pract. 2, 35–44 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Harbi, K.M.A.-S.: Application of the AHP in project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 19, 19–27 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Decai, H.: the Proportion Scales in the ΑΗΡ. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 14(3), 8–13 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169, 1–29 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benítez, J., Delgado-Galván, X., Gutiérrez, J.A., Izquierdo, J.: Balancing consistency and expert judgment in AHP. Math. Comput. Model. 54, 1785–1790 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.023MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gallego-Ayala, J.: Selecting irrigation water pricing alternatives using a multi-methodological approach. Math. Comput. Model. 55, 861–883 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mani, V., Agarwal, R., Sharma, V.: Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. Int. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 2, 98–112 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2014.10.00CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Russo, R.D.F.S.M., Camanho, R.: Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Comput Sci 55, 1123–1132 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prakash, C., Barua, M.K.: An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 108, 63–81 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garg, C.P.: A robust hybrid decision model for evaluation and selection of the strategic alliance partner in the airline industry. J. Air Transp. Manag. 52, 55–66 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, Y., Yan, X., Zhou, Y., Li, X.: Using AHP for evaluating travel mode competitiveness in long-distance travel. In: ICTIS 2015—3rd International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety, Proceedings, pp. 213–218 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ictis.2015.7232180
  15. 15.
    Gerdsri, N., Kocaoglu, D.F.: Applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping. Math. Comput. Model. 46, 1071–1080 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin, H., Yang, X.: Efficient organization study of local tourism transportation mode based on analytic hierarchy process. In: 2014 17th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems ITSC, pp. 1555–1560 (2014) .  https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2014.6957914
  17. 17.
    Anand, O.: Ecommerce AO, In P E-Commerce Website: a Hybrid Mcdm, Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), Noida, 07 Dec 2015, pp. 279–284 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tscheikner-Gratl, F., Egger, P., Rauch, W., Kleidorfer, M.: Comparison of multi-criteria decision support methods for integrated rehabilitation prioritization. Water (Switzerland) 9 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar, S., Luthra, S., Haleem, A.: Critical factors important for effective industry-institute interactions (Iii): an Indian perspective. Int J Anal Hierarchy Process 8 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v8i1.319
  20. 20.
    Dodgson, J.S.: Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Department for Communities and Local Government, London (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baharin, M., Ismail, W.R., Ahmad, R.R., Majid, N.: Factors affecting students’ academic performance using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) In: 2015 International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics (ICREM7), pp. 169–173. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sahroni, T.R., Ariff, H.: Design of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for teaching and learning. In: 2016 11th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (KICSS). IEEE (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyWalchand College of EngineeringSangliIndia

Personalised recommendations