Beyond Trauma: Researching Memory on My Doorstep

  • Sarah Gensburger


In November 2015, the city of Paris experienced major terrorist attacks, most of which happened in my district. My neighborhood became the stage for major grassroot memorials. As it happens, I am a sociologist of memory. The phenomena I had been studying in places far removed from my everyday life were now unfolding on my doorstep. For almost a year, I kept sociological chronicles of this memorialization process. In this chapter, I revisit this research from a methodological perspective: What are the benefits, and difficulties, of interweaving fieldwork and everyday life in the study of memory? And what social dynamics are taking place, beyond trauma?



The author is very grateful to Danielle Drozdzewski and Carolyn Birdsall for their constructive comments and editing work. This text would not have existed without the comments of my colleagues Sylvain Antichan, Maelle Bazin and Gérôme Truc, the conversations I had with my neighbors, friends, or the visitors to this part of Paris, and, of course, without the support of my family, Renaud, Norah, and Jacob.


  1. Allerton, C. (Ed.). (2016). Children: Ethnographic encounters. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, R. (2004). Rituals of solidarity and security in the wake of terrorist attack. Sociological Theory, 22(1), 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Drozdzewski, D., & Robinson, D. F. (2015). Care-work on fieldwork: Taking your own children into the field. Children’s Geographies, 13(3), 372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyregrov, A., Straume, M., Dyregrov, A., & Gronvold Bugge, R. (2016). Weekend gatherings for bereaved family members after the terror killings in Norway in 2011. Bereavement Care, 35(1), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edkins, J. (2003). Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gensburger, S. (2017). Mémoire vive: Chroniques d’un quartier. Bataclan 2015–2016. Paris: Anamosa.Google Scholar
  7. Gensburger, S., & Lefranc, S. (2017). A quoi servent les politiques de mémoire ? Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  8. Heath-Kelly, C. (2016). Death security: Memory and mortality at the bombsite. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirsch, M. (2012). The generation of postmemory: Writing and visual culture after the holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hirst, W., et al. (2015). A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories of flashbulb events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 604–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, R., & Hall, G. (2016). Talking about terrorism: A study of vernacular discourse. Politics, 36(3), 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Legrand, N., Gagnepain, P., Peschanski, D., & Eustache, F. (2015). Neurosciences et mémoires collectives: les schémas entre cerveau, sociétés et cultures. Biologie Aujourd’hui, 209(3), 272–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luminet, O., & Curci, A. (2017). Flashbulb memories: New challenges and future perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Osofsky, J., Kronenberg, M., Bochnek, E., & Cross Hansel, T. (2015). Longitudinal impact at attachment-related risk and exposure to trauma among young children after Hurricane Katrina. Child & Youth Care Forum, 44(4), 493–510.Google Scholar
  15. Pink, S., Sumartojo, E., Lupton, D., & LaBond, H. (2017). Empathetic technologies: Digital materiality and video ethnography. Visual Studies, 32, 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sánchez-Carretero, C. (Ed.). (2011). El Archivo del duelo: análisis de la respuesta ciudadana ante los atentados del 11 de marzo en Madrid. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Smithsimon, G. (2011) September 12: Recovering community and neighborhood at Ground Zero. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2017). Ordinary memory processes shape Flashbulb memories of extraordinary events: A review of 40 years of research. In O. Luminet & A. Curci (Eds.), Flashbulb memories: New challenges and future perspectives (pp. 73–95). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Tolia-Kelly, D., & Rose, G. (2012). Visuality/materiality: Images, objects and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Tota, A. L. (2004). Ethnographying public memory: The commemorative genre for the victims of terrorism in Italy. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Urry, J. (2002). The tourist gaze. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Gensburger
    • 1
  1. 1.French National Centre for Scientific ResearchParisFrance

Personalised recommendations