Advertisement

Perspectives of Lymphatic Filariasis with Special Reference to “Sleepada”: An Ayurvedic Loom

  • Kancherla Prameela Devi
  • P. Srinivas
  • Rohini
Chapter

Abstract

The disease sleepada is analogous to be lymphatic filariasis described in detail in ancient Ayurvedic classics in India. Based on the evidence of literature, it is known that in India, since the time immemorial, filarial population was there. Today India is the largest endemic country of filariasis in the world contributing about 40% of total global burden of filariasis. In Ayurvedic treatises like Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, Astanga Sangraha, Astanga Hridaya, and Madhava Nidana, the disease was dealt thoroughly. In Ayurvedic literature, the word sleepada means stony foot, increase in the size of the foot, and a foot resembling the thickness of a lower timber of chariot. The role of vector was not directly mentioned in Ayurvedic classics, but the area in which breeding of the mosquitoes is very common was mentioned (Anonymous 2010). Medicinal plants are being used in India, especially in Ayurveda, from ancient times for the treatment of filariasis. Therapeutic regimens like external application of poultices, heat therapy, purgation, emesis, and bloodletting from specific points in the affected limb are also mentioned.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors express their sincere gratitude to their organization, the CCRAS, New Delhi, for all the encouragement and help extended in preparing this manuscript.

References

  1. Agnivesa (2009a) Charaka Samhita. Chikitsasthana, 12th Chapter (Vaidya Jadavji Trikamjiacharya, ed). Chowkhambha-prakashan, Varanasi, p 490Google Scholar
  2. Agnivesa (2009b) Charaka Samhita. Vimana Sthana, 2nd Chapter (Vaidya Jadavji Trikamjiacharya, ed). Chowkhambha-prakashan, VaranasiGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2010) Reported medical practices on prevention, management of vector- borne and infectious diseases through Ayurveda and Siddha. CCRAS, Department of Ayush, Goverment of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Anonymous (2012) Perspectives of Indian medicinal plants in the management of lymphatic filariasis. ICMR, Goverment of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhavaprakasha B (2002) (Sanskrita-English translation by Sri Kanthamurthy K.R.), Krishnadas Academy, Varanasi, pp 546–547Google Scholar
  6. Vaidya Cintamani (2014) 53rd Chapter, 30,31 and 32 slokas, 1st edn, Chowkhambha Orientalia, Varanasi, p 496Google Scholar
  7. Madhavakara (2006) Madhavanidanam, 39th Chapter (Sri Brahmashankarashastri Bhishagratna, ed). Sanskruta Samsthan, Varanasi, pp 340–341Google Scholar
  8. Sushruta (2009a) Susruta Samhita. Nidanasthana 12th Chapter (Vaidya Jadavji Trikamjiacharya, ed). Chowkhambha Sanskruta Samsthan, Varanasi, pp 317–318Google Scholar
  9. Sushruta (2009b) Susruta Samhita. Chikitsasthana 19th Chapter (Vaidya Jadavji Trikamjiacharya, ed). Chowkhambha Sanskruta Samsthan, Varanasi, pp 477–785Google Scholar
  10. Sushruta (2009c) Susruta Samhita, Nidanasthana 5th Chapter (Vaidya Jadavji Trikamjiacharya, ed). Chowkhambha Sanskruta Samsthan, VaranasiGoogle Scholar
  11. Vagbhata (2000) Ashtanga Hridroga with the commentaries of sarvangasundaram of Arunadatta and Ayurveda Rasayana of Hemadri. Reprint. Varanasi Krishnadas AcademyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kancherla Prameela Devi
    • 1
  • P. Srinivas
    • 1
  • Rohini
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Officer(Ay), Scientist-3, Achanta Lakshmipathi Ayurvedic Research Centre for AyurvedaCCRAS, Ministry of AYUSH, Government of IndiaChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations