• Ilan Wiesel
Part of the The Contemporary City book series (TCONTCI)


In this chapter, I examine the myriad strategies through which residents of Mosman, Toorak, and Cottesloe mobilise their exceptional economic, social, and cultural capitals to achieve collective and individual objectives. The advantages of elite neighbourhoods become apparent in various forms, from successful fund-raising campaigns for local sporting facilities, through to the benefits of informal professional and business networks initiated within each neighbourhood . Yet, collective action towards shared goals is often held back by residents’ conservative ideologies valorising self-interest over communal good, aversion to government and the political process, busy careers, and even a surprising sense of ‘powerlessness’.


  1. Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2000). Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review, 90(2), 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Connell, R., Ashenden, D., & Kessler, S. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Daniel, G. (2015). Patterns of parent involvement: A longitudinal analysis of family-school partnerships in the early years of school in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 119.Google Scholar
  4. Golden, M. A., & Min, B. (2013). Distributive politics around the world. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1531–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kapoor, I. (2016). Billionaire philanthropy: ‘Decaf capitalism’. In I. Hay & J. Beaverstock (Eds.), Handbook on wealth and the super-rich (pp. 113–131). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McFarlane, C., & Rutherford, J. (2008). Political infrastructures: Governing and experiencing the fabric of the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Murray, G. (2006). Capitalist networks and social power in Australia and New Zealand. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. New South Wales Treasury. (2015a). NSW budget 2015–16. Available at:
  11. New South Wales Treasury. (2015b). NSW budget papers. Available at:
  12. Peel, M., & McCalman, J. (1992). Who went where in who’s who 1988: The schooling of the Australian elite. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  13. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wiesel, I., Liu, F., & Buckle, C. (2017). Locational disadvantage and the spatial distribution of government expenditure on urban infrastructure and services in metropolitan Sydney (1988–2015). Geographical Research. Online First,
  15. Winters, J. A., & Page, B. I. (2009). Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics, 7, 731–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilan Wiesel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GeographyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations