Teaching English by Skype: Theoretical and Practical Considerations from the Perspective of Serbian English Teachers

  • Marija Milojković


As digital technology and the Internet continue developing, teachers have more possibilities of applying technology to enhance second language acquisition. However, when opting for any piece of modern technology, teachers and education professionals need to consider the theoretical and practical implications of using such technologies in the learning process. The present study investigates the potentials and drawbacks of using Skype to conduct one-on-one English language classes based on the opinions and attitudes of 68 experienced online English teachers in Serbia. It addresses questions regarding how to prepare for Skype lessons in terms of necessary computer skills and background information about the learner, whether Skype enables learners to practice different language skills, what kinds of materials teachers recommend using, and what the general advantages and disadvantages of Skype classes are. The data for the study were obtained via a questionnaire comprising open-ended and Likert scale questions and the results were analyzed both from a quantitative and a qualitative perspective. The findings confirm the great potential of using Skype in English language teaching but also point to certain limitations.


  1. Blagojevic, S. (2013). Original texts as authentic ESP teaching material – The case of philosophy. ESP Today, 1(1), 113–126.Google Scholar
  2. Bonk, J., & Dennen, V. (2003). Frameworks for research, design, benchmarks, training and pedagogy in web-based distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Cao, Q., Griffin, T. E., & Bai, X. (2009). The importance of synchronous interaction for student satisfaction with course web sites. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(3), 331–338.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, N. S., Ko, H. C., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chou, C. (2002). A comparative content analysis of student interaction in synchronous and asynchronous learning networks. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1795–1803).Google Scholar
  6. Deng, H., & Zhang, S. (2007). What is the effectiveness of a multimedia classroom? International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(3), 311–322.Google Scholar
  7. Diaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (2002). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook: A complete K-12 reference guide (2nd ed.). Boston: Ally & Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Garcia-Martin, J., & Garcia-Sanchez, J. N. (2013). Patterns of Web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people. Computers & Education, 67, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gesche, A., & Makeham, P. (2008). Creating conditions for intercultural and international learning and teaching. In M. Hellsten & A. Reid (Eds.), Researching international pedagogies: Sustainable practice for teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 241–258). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Emerging technologies. Skype and podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language, Learning and Technology, 9(3), 9–12.Google Scholar
  11. Hanna, B., & Toohey, A. (2005). When internationalization meets assessment. In C. Bailey & K. Barnett (Eds.), Proceedings of social change in the 21st century (pp. 1–17). Brisbane: QUT.Google Scholar
  12. Hrastinski, S. (2006). Introducing an informal synchronous medium in a distance learning course: How is participation affected? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kilimci, S. (2010). Integration of the internet into a language curriculum in a multicultural society. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 107–113.Google Scholar
  14. Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45–77). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. LaPointe, D., Greyesen, K., & Barrett, K. (2004). Speak2me: Using synchronous audio for ESL in Taiwan. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis, C. C., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2006). Implementing effective online teaching practices: Voices of exemplary faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 377–393). Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  18. Park, Y. J., & Bonk, C. (2007). Is online life a breeze? A case study for promoting synchronous learning in a blended graduate course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 307–323.Google Scholar
  19. Reinders, H., & Hubbard, P. (2013). CALL and learner autonomy: Affordances and constraints. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 359–376). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Statista. (2017). Most famous social network sites worldwide as of January 2017, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Available at: Accessed 21 Feb 2018.
  21. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, M., Reinders, H., & Warschauer, M. (2013). Contemporary computer-assisted language learning: The role of digital media and incremental change. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 1–12). London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  23. Timpson, W. (1999). Metateaching and the instructional map. Madison: Artwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3–20). Tokyo: Logos International.Google Scholar
  25. Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(5), 553–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marija Milojković
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Academic Studies of Philology, Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of NišNišSerbia

Personalised recommendations