Integrating “Talk Abroad” into an Intermediate Foreign Language Course: Building Learner Autonomy and Engagement Through Video Conversations with Native Speakers

  • Catherine M. SamaEmail author
  • Yu Wu


This study examined the efficacy and best practices in integrating a video-synchronous computer mediated communication tool “Talk Abroad” (TA) into an intermediate foreign language course. Students completed four TA projects, four immediate written reflections and an end-of-semester exit questionnaire. Quantitative analysis of students’ performance in the first and fourth conversations revealed that students have made significant increases in oral proficiency, especially in the area of accuracy and fluency. Qualitative analysis of learner written reflections demonstrated high affective gains despite different degrees in linguistic development. Through the pedagogical cycle of in-class instruction, TA practice, and immediate written reflections, students showed increasing autonomy in linguistic development and self-regulated learning strategies. All students reported that they were more engaged and willing to challenge themselves by the end of the study.


  1. Belz, J. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language, Learning and Technology, 7(2), 68–99.Google Scholar
  2. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  4. Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Hammadou Sullivan, J. (2011). Taking charge: Teacher candidates’ preparation for the oral proficiency interview. Foreign Language Annuals, 44(2), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hasko, V., Moser, R., Guida, F., Hayes, M., & Alves, V. (2017). Maximizing oral proficiency development via telecollaborative partnerships in the Portuguese flagship program. In D. Murphy & K. Evans-Romaine (Eds.), Exploring the US language flagship program: Professional competence in a second language by graduation (pp. 90–115). Tonawanda: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  7. Kato, F., Spring, R., & Mori, C. (2016). Mutually beneficial foreign language learning: Creating meaningful interactions through video-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Foreign Language Annuals, 49(2), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knell, E., & West, H. (2017). To delay or not to delay: The timing of Chinese character instruction for secondary learners. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lin, H. (2014). Establishing an empirical link between computer-mediated communication (CMC) and SLA: A meta-analysis of the research. Language, Learning and Technology, 18(3), 120–127.Google Scholar
  11. Lin, H. (2015). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 27(3), 261–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moeller, A. J. (2013). Advanced low language proficiency: An achievable goal? Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moreno-Lopez, I., Ramos-Sellman, A., Miranda-Aldaco, C., & Quinto, M. (2017). Transforming ways of enhancing foreign language acquisition in the Spanish classroom: Experiential learning approaches. Foreign Language Annuals, 50(2), 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saito, K., & Akiyama, K. (2017). Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 67(1), 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  16. Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. (2017). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36(January 2018), 41–53.Google Scholar
  17. The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2015). ACTFL performance descriptors for language learners. Available at: Accessed 27 Feb 2018.
  18. Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Modern and Classical Languages and LiteraturesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations