Locating Digital Humanities: Teaching e-Literature in the Pacific

  • John Paolo SarceEmail author
Part of the Digital Culture and Humanities book series (DICUHU, volume 1)


Teaching e-literature (electronic literature) is an academic space for both explorations and contestations in the East. However, the East is not a monolithic location or space; the East that lies near and within the Pacific is still divided, based on the countries’ locations and economic statuses. The Philippines, as a country located specifically in the Southeast of the Pacific, is still experiencing several struggles over teaching and creating e-literature, a part of the ‘Digital Humanities’ that cultivate and nourish, while at the same time deconstructing different forms of art. Teaching in the twenty-first century is already a huge challenge for every pedagogue; thus, to teach e-literature is another challenge that both educators and school administrators have to work on and excel at when they prepare their students for the future. Not only ‘teaching’ and ‘e-literature’ or Digital Humanities (in the broader sense) are sites that should be considered and interrogated critically under different researches focusing on these new trends in academia, but also ‘location’ should be taken into consideration within this field. This essay interrogates and presents the complications of teaching e-literature, once it is juxtaposed to ‘location’. Studying location vis-à-vis teaching and e-literature creates tension and nuances that, once critically interrogated and examined, appear since location can either denote resistance or acceptance when analysed through the lenses of post-colonial theory. This chapter presents the multileveled and varied reaction of a Southeast Pacific country towards Digital Humanities, due to their former colonialisation and to their social and economic statuses that, in spite of technology’s invasions across the world e-literature or Digital Humanities, are still outside or weak on the Philippines’ academic radar. Our perception of e-literature is currently affected by such forces as cultural and economic ones, which makes teaching e-literature almost impossible. But because of the current changes in education in the Philippines, our perception on e-literature is now possibly able to change. Teaching e-literature in our classrooms now can open up a space of mutual understanding and for bridging the widening gaps between science, technology, and the humanities.


E-literature Critical studies Pedagogy Cultural studies Digital Humanities 


  1. Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Antonijevic, S. (2015). Amongst digital humanists: An ethnographic study of digital knowledge production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (2010). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  4. Atienza, P. (2016) Vince & Kath’s love story is the new-age Romeo and Juliet. LoveIt.PH|News Philippines. Retrieved from
  5. Benedictine International School. (2011). Student handbook school year 2011–2012. Retrieved from
  6. Bhabha, H. K. (1993). Location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Buccat, R. (2016). Meet the young mom behind ‘Kath & Vince’. ABS-CBN News. Retrieved from
  8. Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., & Presner, T. (2012). Digital humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  9. CenterNet. (2017). Centers. [Geographical Map of DH centers] Retrieved from
  10. Colegio de San Juan de Letran Calamba. (2015). Student handbook basic education 2015–2016. Retrieved from.
  11. Department of Education, the Philippines. (2016). Curriculum guide for 21st century literature. Retrieved from
  12. Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. (2007). Anthropology, history, and education. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lepi, K. (2014, May 23). The top 10 (and counting) education systems in the world. Edudemic. Retrieved from.
  15. Life and Social Media. (2016). Crush – Vince & Kath Part II [Facebook post]. Retrieved from.
  16. Manila Pubic Schools Justin Veach Elementary School. (2016). Retrieved from.
  17. Mcpherson, T. (2009, December 10). Expanding the scholarly imagination: experiments in the digital humanities. [Video file] Retrieved from.
  18. Mcpherson, T. (2012).Why are the Digital Humanities so white? or thinking the histories of race and computation. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Retrieved from. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Readings, B. (1999). The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Risam, R. (2015). Across two (imperial) cultures: Ballad of digital humanities & the global South [video file]. Retrieved from.
  21. Sample, M. (2016). What is electronic literature? EdX., Retrieved from
  22. Spivak, G. C. (2003). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Spivak, G. C. (2008). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Spivak, G. C. (2013). An aesthetic education in the era of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Susmerano, S. (2016). Text Tula. [Blog post] Retrieved from.
  26. Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2010). Five elements of digital literature. In R. Simanowski & J. Schäfer (Eds.), Reading moving letters: Digital literature in research and teaching: A handbook (pp. 29–57). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. We are Social Singapore, & Hootsuite. (2015). Digital, social & mobile in 2016. [Presentation slides] Retrieved from.
  28. Xavier School. (2016). Student handbook. Retrieved from.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ateneo de Manila UniversityManilaThe Philippines

Personalised recommendations