Advertisement

Petrophysical Characterization of Sandstone Reservoir from Well Log Data: A Case Study from South Tapti Formation, India

  • N. P. Singh
  • S. P. MauryaEmail author
  • Kumar Hemant Singh
Conference paper

Abstract

The present study is aimed at evaluating the reservoir potentials of South Tapti Basin of India with limitation to the available data. A number of petrophysical parameters, i.e., effective porosity (Φ), water saturation (Sw), formation water resistivity (Rw), hydrocarbon saturation (So), and true resistivity (Rt), are evaluated using the well log data, and the reservoir characterization is performed. The analysis shows a hydrocarbon-bearing zone in between 1866 and 1874 m, which contains gamma ray (GR) value of 34.4 API, resistivity of 117.3 Ω m, and average porosity of 35.7%. To know the fluid type in the reservoir zone, neutron porosity and density porosity are plotted together and a crossover has been noticed at 1866–1874 m depth which indicates that the reservoir is filled with gas. The analysis of petrophysical parameters and cross-plots shows that the reservoir is filled with sandstone with some clay content separated by shale markers, which act as seal rock for the reservoir.

Keywords

Petrophysical characterization South Tapti Basin Sandstone reservoir Cross-plots Hydrocarbon saturation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank BG, India, for providing the well log data for South Tapti Basin for research and development work.

References

  1. Adaeze IU, Samuel OO, Cajetan JI (2012) Petrophysical evaluation of Uzek well using well log and core data, Offshore Depobelt, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Adv Appl Sci Res 3(5):2966–2991Google Scholar
  2. Adeoti L, Ayolabi EA, James PL (2009) An integrated approach to volume of shale analysis: Niger Delta example, Offrire Field. World Appl Sci J 7(4):448–452Google Scholar
  3. Asquith GB, Krygowski D, Gibson CR (2004) Basic well log analysis, vol 16. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Crain ER (2002) Crain’s petrophysical handbook. Spectrum 2000 Mindware Ltd., Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. Economides MJ, Nolte KG (1989) Reservoir stimulation, vol 2. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo R (2004) Supplement to determining method of cut-off value of net pay. Petroleum Exploration and Development. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200405044.htm. Accessed 22 Mar 2019
  7. Hamada GM (1996) An integrated approach to determine shale volume and hydrocarbon potential in shaly sand. In: SCA international symposium. http://www.jgmaas.com/SCA/1996/SCA1996-41.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2019
  8. Maurya SP, Singh KH (2015) LP and ML sparse spike inversion for reservoir characterization—a case study from Blackfoot area, Alberta, Canada. In: 77th EAGE conference and exhibition.  https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201412822
  9. Morris RL, Biggs WP (1967) Using log-derived values of water saturation and porosity. In: Society of petrophysicists and well-log analysts, 8th annual logging symposium, Denver, CO, USA, 12–14 JuneGoogle Scholar
  10. Ofwona CO (2014) Introduction to geophysical well logging and flow testing. Short Course V on Exploration for Geothermal Resources. https://orkustofnun.is/gogn/unu-gtp-sc/UNU-GTP-SC-11-35.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2019
  11. Opuwari M (2010) Petrophysical evaluation of the Albian age gas bearing sandstone reservoirs of the OM field, Orange basin, South Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Western Cape. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58914267.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2019
  12. Rider MH (2000) The geological interpretation of well logs, 2nd edn. Whittles Publishing, Caithness, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Saha S, Stuart DB, Stuart G, Thurlow A, Andy T (2009) The stratigraphic and sedimentological evolution of the Mahim, Daman and Mahuva formation reservoirs of the Tapti fields: tidally-influenced deposition in an Oligo-Miocene tropical estuarine embayment on the continental shelf of Western India. In: AAPG Hedberg conference, Jakarta, Indonesia. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdfz/abstracts/pdf/2010/hedberg_indonesia/abstracts/ndx_saha.pdf.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2019
  14. Schlumberger (1991) Log interpretation principles/applications. Schlumberger Educational Services. https://www.slb.com/resources/publications/books/lipa.aspx. Accessed 21 Mar 2019
  15. Waldschmidt WA, Fitzgerald PE, Lunsford CL (1956) Classification of porosity and fractures in reservoir rocks. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Bull 40:953–974Google Scholar
  16. Wandrey C (2004) Bombay geologic province eocene to miocene composite total petroleum system, India. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2208-F. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/2208/F/b2208-f.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2019
  17. Worthington PF, Cosentino L (2005) The role of cut-offs in integrated reservoir studies. SPEREE 8(4):276–290.  https://doi.org/10.2118/84387-PACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. P. Singh
    • 1
  • S. P. Maurya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kumar Hemant Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geophysics, Institute of ScienceBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesIndian Institute of TechnologyBombayIndia

Personalised recommendations