Advertisement

Development of an Environmental Management System Framework for Hong Kong Higher Education Institutions

  • Yi-Chen LanEmail author
  • Shiu Chuen Lee
Chapter

Abstract

This research project aims to develop an Environmental Management System Framework, which is suitable for adoption by the eight publicly funded higher education institutions (HEIs) in Hong Kong. This paper presents the first stage of the research and the findings that examined the practices of the eight HEIs based on the published information and conducted semi-structured interviews with the officers responsible for environmental sustainability (altogether nine interviews from eight HEIs) to verify and confirm the practices of the HEIs, which are matched with the common sustainable practices under the Dynamic Capabilities and the required elements of the ISO 14001:2015. The features of the common sustainable practices under the Dynamic Capabilities are under those in three capabilities: scanning/monitoring capability, sensing/seizing capability, and reconfiguration capability. The required elements of the ISO 14001:2015 are leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement process. The research findings show that the gap between the practices of the HEIs on environmental sustainability and those practices featured in the Dynamic Capabilities and ISO 14001 is not significant. The development of an EMS which includes the aforesaid features is feasible. The HEIs are not on the other hand prepared to spend resources to obtain external certification and elaborate documentation. Hence, it would not be included in the proposed EMS framework. However, the research results show that the participation of staff members and students in various processes in the EMS development should be included in the proposed framework. In the next stage of this research, the expectation of the staff members and students for those practices featured in the Dynamic Capabilities and ISO 14001 would be gauged through semi-structured interviews. After this process the research can conclude with a suggested EMS which is feasible and meets with the expectation of stakeholders of the HEIs.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility ISO 14001 Dynamic capabilities Dynamic capabilities view Environmental management system Environmental sustainability Higher education institutions Stakeholder engagement 

References

  1. 1.
    Cortese AD. The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan High Educ. 2003;31(3):15–22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrer-Balas D, Adachi J, Banas S, Davidson CI, Hoshikoshi A, Mishra A, Motodoa Y, Onga M, Ostwald M. An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2008;9(3):295–316.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 213 Gold award (sectoral award—public organizations and utilities), Hong Kong Awards for Environmental Excellence. 2014. http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/sustainability/en/awards_and_reports/recognitions/main.html.
  4. 4.
    Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong. HKBU wins silver sectoral award at Hong Kong awards for environmental excellence. 2012. http://enews.hkbu.edu.hk/view_article.php?id=16701.
  5. 5.
    Hong Kong Consortium for Campus Sustainability, Hong Kong. Hong Kong declaration. 2017. http://www.hkscc.edu.hk/hk-declaration.
  6. 6.
    Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong. The directory of ISO 14001 certified companies in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Environmental Protection Department; 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darnall N, Daniel E. Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strateg Manag J. 2006;27:301–20.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ortz E. Reflexive environmental law. Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1995;89:1227–90.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clarke A, Rosa K. Choosing an appropriate university or college environmental management system. J Clean Prod. 2009;17:971–84.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Vries HJ, Bayramoglu DK, van der Wiele T. Business and environmental impact of ISO 14001. Int J Qual Reliabil Manag. 2012;29(4):425–35.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirkland LH. Introducing environmental management systems to corporations. Calgary, AB: Faculty of Environmental Design, The University of Calgary; 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao J. The effect of the ISO-14001 environmental management system on corporate financial performance. Fairfield, IA: Graduate School Maharishi University of Management; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arvidsson K. Environmental management at Swedish universities. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2004;5(1):91–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bero BN, Doerry E, Middleton R, Meinhart C. Challenges in the development of environmental management systems on the modern university campus. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2011;13(2):133–49.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Delakowitz B, Hoffmann A. The Hochschule Zittau/GoÈ rlitz Germany’s first registered environmental management (EMAS) at an institution of higher education. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2000;1(1):35–47.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jain S, Pallavi P. Environmental management systems for educational institutions: a case study of TERI University, New Delhi. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2010;11(3):236–49.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacDonald JP. Strategic sustainable development using the ISO 14001 standard. J Clean Prod. 2005;13:631–43.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Savely SM. A survey of the implementation status of environmental management systems in U.S. colleges and universities. Houston, TX: School of Public Health. The University of Texas; 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Savely SM, Carson AI, Delclos GL. An environmental management system implementation model for U.S. colleges and universities. J Clean Prod. 2007;15:660–70.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taddei-Bringas JL, Esquer-Peralta J, Platt-Carrillo A. ISO 14001 and sustainability at universities: a Mexican case. Manag Environ Qual Int J. 2008;19(5):613–26.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J. 2000;21:1105–21.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capacities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 1997;18(7):509–33.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu Q, He Q, Duan Y. Explicating dynamic capabilities for corporate sustainability. EuroMed J Business. 2013;8(3):255–72.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu Q, He Q, Duan Y, O’Regan N. Implementing dynamic capabilities for corporate strategic change towards sustainability. Strateg Chang. 2012;21:231–47.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Winter SG. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J. 2003;24(10):991–5.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herremans IADE. Environmental management systems at North American universities: what drives good performance? Int J Sustain High Educ. 2000;1(2):168–81.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nicolaides A. The implementation of environmental management towards sustainable universities and education for sustainable development as an ethical imperative. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2006;7(4):414–24.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simkins, G.N., A. Environmental management system in universities. Environmental Association for Universities and Colleges. 2004.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Noeke J. Environmental management systems for universities: a case study. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2000;1(3):237–51.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Workplace Law Environmental, U.K. Survey shows ISO 14001 certifications exceed 285,000. 2013. http://www.workplacelaw.net/environment/news/49525/survey-shows-iso-14001-certifications-exceed-285-000.
  32. 32.
    European Commission. EMAS. 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/index_en.htm.
  33. 33.
    Ayres L. Semi-structured interviews. In: Given L, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 811–2.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wengraf T. Models of research design and their application to semi-structured depth interviewing. In: Wengraf T, editor. Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: SAGE Publications; 2001.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Task Force on Sustainable Campus, Hong Kong Baptist University. Campus Sustainability Guide. 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations