Advertisement

An Approach for Establishing Eco-Product Value Indicators

  • Chen-Fu ChenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Since there are more and more eco-products with the eco-label or claimed environmental information by the manufacturer in the market, consumers may wait for an “eco-product value index” instead of many lines of descriptive environmental information for claimed eco-products, which will help choose more environmental products with a clear quantitative indicator or a relative eco-label. As such, this study has applied multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for establishing a framework of “eco-product value (EPV) indicators” which consists of value compositions and their attributes. TOPSIS can provide an applicable method for ranking design alternatives in terms of their overall performance with respect to EPV indicators. An experimental study on environment-friendly office chair design with EPV has been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach. These indicators are what we consider to be “headline indicators” that help us measure certain important aspects of sustainability for a specific eco-product category.

Keywords

Eco-product Eco-product value Eco-product value indicator MCDM 

References

  1. 1.
    Stevels A. On the Future of EcoDesign. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing; 2009 Dec 7–9; Sapporo; 2009. p. 47–51.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masuda F, Satsuki K, Naoki I. Eco-value as an indicator for sustainable design. Proceedings of the 2th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing; 2001 Dec 10–13; Tokyo. 2001. p. 1106–1109.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yim H, Herrmann C Consumer behavior on ecoproduct. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing; 2003 Dec 8–11; Tokyo. 2003. p. 771–778.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deng H, Yeh C-H, Willis RJ. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res. 2000;27:963–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeh C-H, Chang Y-H. Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;194:464–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Product DesignMing Chuan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations