Integration of Sustainability Targets into the Product Creation Process of German Manufacturing Companies

  • Tom BuchertEmail author
  • Rainer Stark


To achieve a transformation towards sustainable value creation, the manufacturing sector needs to contribute by limiting the use of natural resources as well as harmful emissions without compromising financial stability of companies. One pivotal strategy in this context is to guarantee a sustainable product life cycle by prospective consideration of sustainability factors in product development. The definition, implementation and validation of sustainability targets in the design process is a necessary condition for that purpose. To gather insights how companies address this challenge can be considered as difficult. This article presents the result of an empirical study which gives a first basic understanding how selected German companies address sustainability targets and which methods and tools for validation are used. The study consists of an initial workshop and nine expert interviews conducted in 2016/2017. In the scope of the study, defined targets and their validation, involved organizational roles as well as trade-offs between targets are discussed. Furthermore, the authors elaborate on potentials for further research.


Sustainable product development Empirical study Sustainability targets Manufacturing industry 


  1. 1.
    United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Warsen J, Krinke S. The life cycle approach at Volkswagen. ATZ Worldwide. 2012;114(7–8):4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boks C, Pascual O. The role of success factors and obstacles in design for environment: a survey among Asian electronics companies. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment; IEEE. 2004. p. 10–3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Short T, Lee-Mortimer A, Luttropp C, Johansson G. Manufacturing, sustainability, ecodesign and risk: lessons learned from a study of Swedish and English companies. J Clean Prod. 2012;37:342–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deutz P, McGuire M, Neighbour G. Eco-design practice in the context of a structured design process: an interdisciplinary empirical study of UK manufacturers. J Clean Prod. 2013;39:117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bey N, Hauschild MZ, McAloone TC. Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies. CIRP Ann. 2013;62(1):43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kara S, Ibbotson S, Kayis B. Sustainable product development in practice: an international survey. J Manu Tech Mnagmnt. 2014;25(6):848–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dekoninck EA, Domingo L, O'Hare JA, Pigosso DC, Reyes T, Troussier N. Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: development and consolidation of a framework. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:410–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shuaib M, Seevers D, Zhang X, Badurdeen F, Rouch KE, Jawahir IS. Product sustainability index (ProdSI). J Ind Ecol. 2014;18(4):491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verein Deutscher Ingenieure. Richtlinie. VDI 2206: Entwicklungsmethodik für mech. Systeme. 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote K-H. Konstruktionslehre: Grundlagen erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung; Methoden und Anwendung. 7th ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. 2014. Accessed 8 Nov 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial Information TechnologyTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design TechnologyBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations