Advertisement

Strabismus pp 19-46 | Cite as

Clinical Evaluation of Strabismus

  • Siddharth Agrawal
  • Ankur Yadav
  • Neha Singh
Chapter

Abstract

It is not uncommon in an ophthalmologist’s office to have an anxious couple with the complaint of their child squinting occasionally. Confirming the presence or absence of deviation requires patience and a systematic approach. Even if obvious, the ophthalmologist should not comment on the deviation till completion of examination.

Keywords

Bruckner test Cover-uncover test Prism bar cover test Diplopia charting Stereopsis 

References

  1. 1.
    Birch EE, Fawcett SL, Morale SE, Weakley DR, Wheaton DH. Risk factors for accommodative esotropia among hypermetropic children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:526–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohney BG. Common forms of childhood esotropia. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:805–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kutschke P. Preverbal assessment of amblyopia. Am Orthop J. 2005;55:53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kothari M, Bhaskare A, Mete D, Toshniwal S, Doshi P, Kaul S. Evaluation of central, steady, maintained fixation grading for predicting inter-eye visual acuity difference to diagnose and treat amblyopia in strabismic patients. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009;57:281–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Azen SP, Varma R, Preston-Martin S, Ying-Lai M, Globe D, Hahn S. Binocular visual acuity summation and inhibition in an ocular epidemiological study: the Los Angeles Latino eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1742–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, and the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Eye examination in infants, children and young adults by pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2003;111:902–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balmer A, Munier F. Differential diagnosis of leukocoria and strabismus, first presenting signs of retinoblastoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2007;1:431–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Chapter 12: Examination of the patient II. In: Binocular vision and ocular motility. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 168–210.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanski JJ, Strabismus BB. Clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. p. 755–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hirschberg J. Uber die Messundg des SChielgrades und die Dosierung der Schielopeartion. Zentralbl Prakt Augenkeilkd. 1885;9:325.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krimskey E. The binocular examination of the young child. Am J Ophthalmol. 1943;26:624.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bielschowsky A. Lectures on motor anomalies. Hannover, NH: Dartmouth College Publications; 1943/1956.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hering E. The teaching of the binocular. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann; 1868.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sherrington CS. Experimental note on two movements of the eye. J Physiol Lond. 1894;17:27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berens C, Losey CC, Hardy LH. Routine examination of the ocular muscles and non-operative treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1927;10:910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Chapter 13: Examination of the patient III. In: Binocular vision and ocular motility. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 211–45.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    von Noorden GK. Infantile esotropia: A continuing riddle (Scobee Lecture). Am Orthopt J. 1984;34:52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bagolini B. Technica per Iésame della vision binoculare sense introduzione di elementi dissocianti: “test del vetro striato”. Boll Ocul. 1958;37:195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cuppers C. Moderne Schielbehandlung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1956;129:579.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quere MA, Lavenant G, Pechereau A, et al. Les diplopies incoercibles post-therapeutiques. J Fr Orthopt. 1993;25:191.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cantor LB, Rapuano CJ, Cioffi GA. Chapter 4. Amblyopia. In: Section 6. Basic and clinical science course 2015–16. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology. p. 33–40.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Chapter 15: Examination of the patient V. In: Binocular vision and ocular motility. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 298–307.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lang J. Der Treffversuch zur Prufung des stereoskopischen Sehens. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1974;165:895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    LaRoche R, von Norrden GK. Theoretical and practical evaluation of a simple stereotest. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982;22(Suppl):266.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fawcett SL, Birch EE. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000;4:354–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fricke TR, Siderov J. Stereopsis, stereotests, and their relation to vision screening and clinical practice. Clin Exp Optom. 1997;80(5):165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holmes JM, Birch EE, Mohney BG. Newer test of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(6):1215–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singh V, Pandey M, Agrawal S. Binocular potential score: a novel concept. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2008;45(2):104–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khan AZ, Crawford JD. Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vis Res. 2001;41(14):1743–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siddharth Agrawal
    • 1
  • Ankur Yadav
    • 1
  • Neha Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyKing George’s Medical UniversityLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations