Strategic Architecture Framework Aligned with IT Strategy Promoting Cloud/Mobile IT/Digital IT

  • Yoshimasa MasudaEmail author
  • Murlikrishna Viswanathan


The purpose of this chapter is to propose an “Adaptive Integrated Digital Architecture Framework—AIDAF” to meet the requirements of the digital transformation in relation to the above agility-related aspects. The proposed EA framework should support an IT strategy promoting cloud/mobile IT/Digital IT, based on what our prior research suggested. Also, we show the recommended EA artifacts in AIDAF, compared with Zachman Framework and DODAF, for use with the EA3 Cube Framework. Moreover, we propose an architecture assessment model, global communication/knowledge management model, and Risk Management model related to the above AIDAF in this chapter. In later chapters, we will show a case of EA framework building by the global company.


Architecture assessment Digital Agility Global communication Knowledge management Risk Management 


  1. Bernard, S. (2006). Using enterprise architecture to integrate strategic, business, and technology planning. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 2, 11–28.Google Scholar
  2. Rogers, E. M. (1992). Multimedia technology: The new media in society (T. Yasuda, Trans.). Kyoritsu Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework. (2013). Version 2.Google Scholar
  4. Franke, U., Hook, D., Konig, J., Lagerstrom, R., Narman, P., Ullberg, J., Gustafsson, P., & Ekstedt, M. (2009). EAF2—a framework for categorizing enterprise architecture frameworks. In Proceedings of the 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (pp. 327–332). IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  5. Gill, A. Q. (2014). Applying agility and living service systems thinking to enterprise architecture. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 10(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gill, A. Q. (2015). Adaptive cloud enterprise architecture. Intelligent Information Systems (Vol. 4). Australia: University of Technology.Google Scholar
  7. Gill, A. Q., Smith, S., Beydoun, G., & Sugumaran, V. (2014). Agile enterprise architecture: A case of a cloud technology-enabled government enterprise transformation. In Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2014) (pp. 1–11). United States.Google Scholar
  8. Aldrich, H. (2007).Organizations evolving [Soshiki Shinkaron]. Toyo Keizai Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Information Systems Audit and Control Association—ISACA (2012). COBIT5: A business framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, J. N. (2016). Overview of an emerging standard on architecture processes—ISO/IEC 42020. In The 26th Annual INCOSE International Symposium (IS 2016),CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin, J. N. (2017). Overview of an emerging standard on architecture evaluation—ISO/IEC 42030. In The 27th Annual INCOSE International Symposium (IS 2017). Adelaide, Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanbe M., Yamamoto, S., & Ohta, T. (2010). A proposal of TIE model for communication in software development process. In K. Nakakoji, Y. Murakami, & E. McCready (Eds.), JSAI-is AI, LNAI 6284 (pp. 104–115). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masuda, Y., Shirasaka, S., Yamamoto, S. & Hardjono, T. (2017a). 7 1. An adaptive enterprise architecture framework and implementation: Towards global enterprises in the era of cloud/mobile IT/digital IT. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems. IGI Global, 13, 3, 1–22. Scholar
  14. Masuda, Y., Shirasaka, S., Yamamoto, S., & Hardjono, T. (2017b). Proposal of GDTC model for global communication on enterprise portal—KES 2017. In 21st International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, France, September in 2017 (pp. 1178–1188). Journal of Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Masuda, Y., Shirasaka, S., Yamamoto, S., & Hardjono, T. (2017c). Risk management for digital transformation in architecture board: A case study on global enterprise. In EAIS International Conference 2017, 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), IEEE Conference Proceedings (pp. 255–262).Google Scholar
  16. Masuda, Y., Shirasaka, S., Yamamoto, S., & Hardjono, T. (2018). Architecture board practices in adaptive enterprise architecture with digital platform: A case of global healthcare enterprise. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems. IGI Global, 14(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy—creating a foundation for business execution, Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sowa, J. F., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. The Open Group. (2009). Content metamodel. Retrieved October 15, 2010, from
  20. The Open Group. (2017). Open Group Standard—The Open Group IT4IT™ reference architecture, version 2.1.Google Scholar
  21. TOGAF® Version 9.1. (2011). An open group standard. Retrieved from
  22. UK Ministry of Defence. (2010a). MOD architecture framework (MODAF). Retrieved October 22, 2010 from
  23. UK Ministry of Defence. (2010b). The MODAF service oriented viewpoint. Retrieved October 24, 2010 from
  24. US Department of Defense. (2009). DoD architecture framework Version 2.0. Retrieved October 20, 2010 from
  25. Yamamoto S. (2010).Organizational communication change through CMC: Learning from practice through enterprise SNS. NTT 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Yamamoto, S. (2017). Operating model: architecture series (Web Computer Report).Google Scholar
  27. Yamamoto, S., & Kanbe, M. (2008a). Knowledge creation by enterprise SNS. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 8, 255–264.Google Scholar
  28. Yamamoto, S., & Kanbe, M. (2008b). Discussions on models for digital knowledge sharing in enterprises. In 3rd Research Meeting on Knowledge Sharing Networks. Japanese Society of Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
  29. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 454–470. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon University in AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations