Total Indoor Farming Concepts for Large-Scale Production

  • Marc Kreuger
  • Lianne Meeuws
  • Gertjan Meeuws


Indoor farming can contribute to the world food production in the coming decades. Indoor growing would greatly reduce the need for water and pesticides to grow crops and enable the production of safe, clean, nutritious, and affordable food. However, to realize the yields needed, some of the plant’s requirements must be met. For this a climate system was designed where light, temperature, and evaporation are controlled independently. In the modular system, a laminar airflow controls evaporation, independent of light levels and without impact of infrared light. Together with crop models, calculations and predictions of yields can be made, which are necessary to define commercial success in advance.

The Plant Balance Model allows to further increase yields and quality by fine-tuning the specific effects of temperature, evaporation, light, and crop management.

In the modular indoor farm, a large variety of crops can be grown. It can consist of a single-layer growing area dedicated for vine crops like tomato, cucumber, and pepper. Alternatively, a multilayer area can produce herbs, lettuce, and other small crops.


Plant balance Tomato Vine crops Indoor farming 


  1. Atwell B, Kriedeman P, Turnbull C (1999) Plants in action. Macmillan Education Australia Pty Ltd, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  2. Castillon A, Shen H, Huq E (2007) Phytochrome interacting factors: central players in phytochrome-mediated light signaling networks. Trends Plant Sci 12:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerdan P, Chory J (2003) Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature 423:881–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chitwood D, Kumar R, Ranjan A et al (2015) Light-induced indeterminacy alters shade-avoiding tomato leaf morphology. Pl Physiol 169:2030–2047Google Scholar
  5. Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S et al (2007) FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of arabidopsis. Science 316:1030–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawford A, McLachlan D, Hetherington A et al (2012) High temperature exposure increases plant cooling capacity. Curr Biol 22(10):R396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demotes-Mainard S, Peron T, Corot A et al (2016) Plant responses to red and far-red lights, applications in horticulture. Environ Exp Bot 121:4–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gupta S, Sharma S, Santisree P et al (2014) Complex and shifting interactions of phytochromes regulate fruit development in tomato. Pl Cell & Environ 37:1688–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hogewoning S, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H et al (2010) Blue light dose–responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J Exp Bot 61:3107–3117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaillias Y, Chory J (2010) Unraveling the paradoxes of plant hormone signaling integration. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:642–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kasperbauer M (1987) Far-red light reflection from green leaves and effects on phytochrome-mediated assimilate partitioning under field conditions. Pl Phys 85:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim S, Yu X, Michaels S (2008) Regulation of CONSTANS and FLOWERING LOCUS T expression in response to changing light quality. Pl Physiol 148:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kong S-G, Okajima K (2016) Diverse photoreceptors and light responses in plants. J Plant Res 129:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lastdrager J, Hanson J, Smeekens S (2014) Sugar signals and the control of plant growth and development. J Exp Bot 65(3):799–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Llorente B, D’Andrea L, Rodriguez-Concepcion M (2016a) Evolutionary recycling of light signaling components in fleshy fruits: New insights on the role of pigments to monitor ripening. Front Pl Sc 7, 263Google Scholar
  16. Llorente B, D’Andrea L, Ruiz-Sola M et al (2016b) b. Tomato fruit carotenoid biosynthesis is adjusted to actual ripening progression by a light-dependent mechanism. Plant J 85:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Massa G, Kim H, Wheeler R et al (2008) Plant productivity in response to LED lighting. Hortscience 43(7):1951–1956Google Scholar
  18. Medrano E, Lorenzo P, Sanchez-Guerrero M et al (2005) Evaluation and modelling of greenhouse cucumber-crop transpiration under high and low radiation conditions. Sci Hortic 105:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Possart A, Fleck C, Hiltbrunner A (2014) Shedding (far-red) light on phytochrome mechanisms and responses in land plants. Plant Sci 217–218:36–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roitsch (1999) Source-sink regulation by sugar and stress. Curr Op Pl Biol 2:198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seversike T, Sermons S, Sinclair T et al (2013) Temperature interactions with transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among cultivated and wild soybean genotypes. Physiol Plant 148:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simpson G, Gendall A, Dean C (1999) When to switch to flowering. Ann Rev Dev Biol 99:519–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stitt M, Zeeman S (2012) Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth. Curr Op Pl Biol 15:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Takeno (2016) Stress-induced flowering: the third category of flowering response. J Exp Bot 67(17):4925–4934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner N, Schulze E, Gollan T (1984) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content - I. Species comparisons at high soil water contents. Oecologia 63:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tyree M, Wilmot T (1990) Errors in the calculation of evaporation and leaf conductance in steady-state porometry; the importance of accurate measurement of leaf temperature. Can J For Res 20:1031–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Dijken A, Schliemann H, Smeekens S (2004) Arabidopsis trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 is essential for normal vegetative growth and transition to flowering. Plant Phys 135:969–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wahl V, Ponnu J, Schlereth A et al (2013) Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 339:704–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang Z, Sinclair T, Zhu M et al (2012) Temperature effect on transpiration response of maize plants to vapour pressure deficit. Environm Exp Bot 78:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Kreuger
    • 1
  • Lianne Meeuws
    • 1
  • Gertjan Meeuws
    • 1
  1. 1.Seven Steps To Heaven B.VEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations