Rehabilitation Therapy of Neurological Training of Paraplegia

  • Wenru Zhao


Spinal cord injury (SCI) [1] is injury of structure and function of spinal cord induced by various nosogenesis, which lead to dysfunctions of spinal cord under the injured level such as motor, sensation and reflex. It is severe disabled injury. It can induce paraplegia or quadriplegia to varying degrees and affect the self-care ability and social ability of the patients greatly. It is difficult in the therapy, especially complete spinal cord injury. Except for implantable functional electrical stimulation and compensation of assistive device, there are no other effective methods for the disease such as surgery, medicine and neural stem cells transplantation [2].


  1. 1.
    Garrido AG, Espitia AML, Magraner LM, et al. Validación española del cuestionario International Spinal Cord Injury Pulmonary Function Basic Data Set para valorar la repercusión de la lesión medular en el sistema respiratorio. Med Clin. 2015;145(11):477–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mothe AJ, Tator CH. Review of transplantation of neural stem/progenitor cells for spinal cord injury. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2013;31(7):701–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zeuke W, Heidrich R. Late paralysis of the peripheral nerves from the neurologic viewpoint. Zentr Neurochir. 1983;44(1):53–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lahmann NA, Tannen A, Dassen T, Kottner J. Friction and shear highly associated with pressure ulcers of residents in long-term care-classification tree analysis (CHAID) of Braden items. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(1):168–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohura N, Ichioka S, Nakatsuka T, Shibata M. Evaluating dressing materials for the prevention of shear force in the treatment of pressure ulcers. J Wound Care. 2005;14(9):401–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Newstead AH, Dragotta NJ, Wood P. Prevention of spinal cord and head injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 1994;18(2):21–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yarkony GM, Roth EJ, Heinemann AW. Functional skills after spinal cord injury rehabilitation:three-year longitudinal follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69(2):111–1114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolse KJ, Schmidt DL, Needham BM. Rehabilitation therapy for patients with long-term spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71(9):659–62.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brucker BS. Biofeedback and rehabilitation. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical application. New York, NY: Williams & Wilkins Co; 1980. p. 188–217.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brucker BS. Biofeedback and rehabilitation. In: Golden R, editor. Current rehabilitation psychology. San Diege, CA: Grune and Ttratton; 1984. p. 173–99.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brucker BS, Bulaeva NV. Biofeedback effect on electromyography responses in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(2):133–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vogel G. New brain cells prompt theory of depression. Science. 2000;290(590):258–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wenru Z, Qiqiu Q, Bing Q. Exploration of pedicled epicardial spinal cord in the treatment of paraplegia. Chin J Orthop. 1994;9(14):561–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mulholland TB. Biofeedback as scientific method. In: Schwarta GE, editor. Biofeedback: theory and research. New York, NY: Academic; 1977.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stein RB, Brucker BS, Ayyar DR. Motor units in incomplete spinal cord injury: electrical activity contractile properties and the effects of biofeedback. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53(10):880.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klose KJ, Needham BM, Schmidt D. An assessment of the contri bution of electromyographic biofeedback as an adjunct therapy in the physical training of spinal cord injured persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(5):453–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wenru Z, Brucker BS, Xiuru W, et al. Application of myobiofeedback in the injury of old cervical spinal cord. J Chin Rehabil Med. 2003;18(2):91–3.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yulong W. Rehabilitation evaluation, vol. 88. Beijing: People’s Health Publishing House; 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Delisa JA. Rehabilitation medicine: principles and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc.; 1998.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li X, Ling L, Zhiren R, et al. Effect of rehabilitation training on the expression of GAP-43 in brain of cerebral infarction rats. The Fourth Military Medical University. Neurosci Res. 2001;22(16):1469–72.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shifang Z. Research and rehabilitation of brain plasticity after cerebral apoplexy. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;14(7):437–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bohannon RW, Corrigan D. A broad range of force is encompassed by the maximum manual muscle test grade of five. Percept Motor Skills. 2000;90(1):747–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yasuoka M, Yoneda H, Hasegawa N. Application of the treadmill test for estimation of motor due to pain in lumber region and lower extremities. Masui Jpn J Anesthesiol. 1991;40(03):367.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bohannon RW. Internal consistency of manual muscle testing scores. Percept Motor Skills. 1997;85(2):736–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwartz S, Cohen ME, Herbison GJ. Relationship between two measures of upper extremity strength:manual muscle test compared to hand-held myometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(11):1063–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and People's Medical Publishing House 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenru Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurological Training Rehabilitation, Research Room of Beijing DaxingDistrict Chinese and Western Medicine, Combined HospitalBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations