Advertisement

Industrialization as Capacity Building: Skills, Technical Progress, and Technical Capabilities

  • Murat A. Yülek
Chapter

Abstract

Many confuse industrialization with the construction of factory buildings. In fact, it is primarily a skill accumulation and a capacity-building process with a significant intangible aspect; more than hardware, industrialization resembles software. Successful industrialization is possible if skill accumulation and the capacity-building processes are successful. A key implication is that industrial policy should take this into consideration in order to achieve its targets. Instead of targeting mere construction of factory buildings, industrial policy should focus on the long-term capacity-building process.

References

  1. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.Google Scholar
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, M. (1984). “‘Learning’and the accumulation of industrial technological capacity in developing countries”, in Technological capability in the Third World, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 187–209.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1992). Accumulating technological capability in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(suppl 1), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, 35(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
  7. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1992). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75–84.Google Scholar
  8. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Lee, H. U. (2000). Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: An introductory essay. Journal of Engineering and Technology management, 17(3–4), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian latecomer firms: learning the technology of electronics. World Development, 23(7), 1171–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, L. (1997). The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review, 39(3), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, L. (2001). The dynamics of technological learning in industrialisation. International Social Science Journal, 53(168), 297-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. (2000). Technology, learning, and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lall, S. (2000). Technological change and industrialization in the Asian newly industrializing economies: Achievements and challenges. Technology, Learning, & Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, 13–68.Google Scholar
  16. Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathews, J. A. (2006). Strategizing, disequilibrium, and profit. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mathews, J. A., & Cho, D. S. (1999). Combinative capabilities and organizational learning in latecomer firms: The case of the Korean semiconductor industry. Journal of World Business, 34(2), 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Radošević, S., & Yörük, E. A. (2015). New metrics of technology upgrading: The Central and East European Countries in a comparative perspective, Grincoh Working Paper No 3.04.Google Scholar
  21. Reinstaller, A., & Unterlass, F. (2012). Comparing business R&D across countries over time: A decomposition exercise using data for the EU 27. Applied Economics Letters, 19(12), 1143–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 3(4), 122–128.Google Scholar
  23. Yülek, M. A. (2017). On the middle income trap, the industrialization process and appropriate industrial policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 17(3), 325–348.Google Scholar
  24. Yun, J. J. (2007). “The development of technological capability and the transformation of inward FDI in Korea from 1962 to 2000”, in Mahlich, J. & Pascha, W. (eds.) Innovation and technology in Korea: Challenges of a newly advanced economy. Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murat A. Yülek
    • 1
  1. 1.Istanbul Commerce UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations