Ankle Arthroscopy: Osteoarticular Procedures

  • Nicholas Yeo
  • Alastair Younger
  • Andie Veljkovic
  • Feras Waly
  • Andrea Veljkovic
  • Yinghui Hua
  • Shiyi Chen
  • Chi Pan Yuen
  • Tun Hing Lui
  • Thomas S. Roukis
  • Shek Ng
  • Thomas Bauer
  • Peter A. J. de Leeuw
  • Jan Ophuis
  • Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs


Ankle arthroscopy requires the establishment of safe and functional portals. The arthroscopy can be performed in a supine, prone, or lateral position. The portals therefore have to match the approach being used.


  1. 1.
    Allegra F, Maffulli N. Double posteromedial portals for posterior ankle arthroscopy in supine position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:996–1001.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acevedo JI, Busch MT, Ganey TM, Hutton WC, Ogden JA. Coaxial portals for posterior ankle arthroscopy: an anatomic study with clinical correlation on 29 patients. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:836–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glick JM, Morgan CD, Myserson MS, Sampson TG, Mann JA. Ankle arthrodesis using an arthroscopic method: long-term follow-up of 34 cases. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(4):428–34.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Townsend D, Di Silvestro M, Krause F, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a multicenter comparative case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(2):98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Brien TS, Hart TS, Shereff MJ, Stone J, Johnson J. Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a comparative study. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20(6):368–74.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Acevedo JI, Mangone PG. Arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;10(3):111–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee KT, Park YU, Kim JS, Kim JB, Kim KC, Kang SK. Long-term results after modified Brostrom procedure without calcaneofibular ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(2):153–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee KT, Lee JI, Sung KS, et al. Biomechanical evaluation against calcaneofibular ligament repair in the Brostrum procedure: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(8):781–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atesok K, Doral MN, Whipple T, et al. Arthroscopy-assisted fracture fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(2):320–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yoshimura I, Naito M, Kanazawa K, Takeyama A, Ida T. Arthroscopic findings in Maisonneuve fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13(1):3–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deng DF, Hamilton GA, Lee M, Rush S, Ford LA, Patel S. Complications associated with foot and ankle arthroscopy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;51:281–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferkel RD, Small HN, Gittins JE. Complications in foot and ankle arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nickisch F, Barg A, Saltzman CL, Beals TC, Bonasia DE, Phisitkul P, Femino JE, Amendola A. Postoperative complications of posterior ankle and hindfoot arthroscopy. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2012;94:439–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Young BH, Flanigan RM, DiGiovanni BF. Complications of ankle arthroscopy utilizing a contemporary noninvasive distraction technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93:963–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zengerink M, van Dijk CN. Complications in ankle arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1420–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferkel RD, Heath DD, Guhl JF. Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 1996;2:200–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Djik CN, van Bergen CJ. Advancements in ankle arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(11):635–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zvijac JE, Lemak L, Schurhoff MR, et al. Analysis of arthroscopically assisted ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(1):70–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Myerson MS, Quil G. Ankle arthrodesis: a comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment. Clin Orthop. 1991;268:85–95.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peterson KS, Lee MS, Buddecke DE. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a retrospective cost analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(3):242–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Loughlin PF, Heyworth BE, Kennedy JG. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):392–404.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bosien WR, Staples OS, Russell SW. Residual disability following acute ankle sprains. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A(6):1237–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Rijn RM, Van Os AG, Bernsen RM, Luijsterburg PA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. What is the clinical course of acute ankle sprains? A systematic literature review. Am J Med. 2008;121:324–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Dijk CN, et al. Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):570–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zengerink M, et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(2):238–46.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Navid DO, Myerson MS. Approach alternatives for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7(3):635–49.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Murawski CD, Kennedy JG. Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(11):1045–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:988–1020.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zengerink M, et al. Current concepts: treatment of osteochondral ankle defects. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(2):331–59, vi.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hannon CP, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: aspects of current management. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(2):164–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Bergen CJ, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus: outcomes at eight to twenty years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(6):519–25.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hunt SA, Sherman O. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with correlation of outcome scoring systems. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(4):360–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tol JL, et al. Treatment strategies in osteochondral defects of the talar dome: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(2):119–26.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee KB, et al. Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(Suppl 1):63S–70S.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Becher C, et al. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):656–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ferkel RD, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1750–62.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hatic SO, Berlet GC. Particulated juvenile articular cartilage graft (DeNovo NT Graft) for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010;3(6):361–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Farr J, et al. Particulated articular cartilage: CAIS and DeNovo NT. J Knee Surg. 2012;25(1):23–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kruse DL, et al. Arthroscopic De Novo NT® juvenile allograft cartilage implantation in the talus: a case presentation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(2):218–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Coetzee JC, et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with particulated juvenile cartilage. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(9):1205–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kelly CM, Wilkins RM. Treatment of benign bone lesions with an injectable calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute. Orthopedics. 2004;27(1 Suppl):s131–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beck S, et al. Operative technique and clinical outcome in endoscopic core decompression of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a pilot study. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:2278–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Murawski CD, Duke GL, Deyer TW, Kennedy JG. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) as a biological adjunct to osteochondral lesions of the talus. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;10(1):18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chahla J, et al. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review of outcomes. J Exp Orthop. 2016;3(1):33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kennedy JG, Murawski CD. The treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous osteochondral transplantation and bone marrow aspirate concentrate: surgical technique. Cartilage. 2011;2(4):327–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Smyth NA, et al. Platelet-rich plasma in the pathologic processes of cartilage: review of basic science evidence. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(8):1399–409.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Schupbach P. Growth factor-mediated treatment of recession defects: a randomized controlled trial and histologic and microcomputed tomography examination. J Periodontol. 2009;80(4):550–64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ridgway HK, Mellonig JT, Cochran DL. Human histologic and clinical evaluation of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor and beta-tricalcium phosphate for the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008;28(2):171–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nevins M, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates bone fill and rate of attachment level gain: results of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2005;76(12):2205–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schmidt MA, Chen EH, Lynch S. A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2005;14:403–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shah P, Keppler L, Rutkowski J. A review of platelet derived growth factor playing pivotal role in bone regeneration. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(3):330–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Younger A, et al. A study to evaluate the safety of platelet-derived growth factor for treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1250–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Morris LH. Athlete’s ankle. J Bone Joint Surg. 1943;25:220.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    McMurray T. Footballer’s ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950;32:68–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zwiers R, Wiegerinck JI, Murawski CD, Fraser EJ, Kennedy JG, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic treatment for anterior ankle impingement: a systematic review of the current literature. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(8):1585–96.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hawkins RB. Arthroscopic treatment of sports-related anterior osteophytes in the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1988;9(2):87–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Scranton PE Jr, McDermott JE. Anterior tibiotalar spurs: a comparison of open versus arthroscopic debridement. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:125–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Vaseenon T, Amendola A. Update on anterior ankle impingement. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(2):145–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tol JL, Verheyen CP, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior impingement in the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(1):9–13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Walsh SJ, Twaddle BC, Rosenfeldt MP, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior ankle impingement: a prospective study of 46 patients with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2722–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Maquirriain J. Posterior ankle impingement syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(6):365–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Spennacchio P, Cucchi D. Evidence-based indications for hindfoot endoscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1386–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Guhl JF. Foot and ankle arthroscopy. 2nd ed. New York: Slack; 1993.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Golano P, Mariani PP, Rodriguez-Niedenfuhr M, Mariani PF, Ruano-Gil D. Arthroscopic anatomy of the posterior ankle ligaments. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(4):353–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ebraheim NA, Taser F, Shafiq Q, Yeasting RA. Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28(2):142–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bartonicek J. Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(5–6):379–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Milner CE, Soames RW. Anatomy of the collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(11):757–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rosenberg ZS, Cheung YY, Beltran J, Sheskier S, Leong M, Jahss M. Posterior intermalleolar ligament of the ankle: normal anatomy and MR imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(2):387–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Oh CS, Won HS, Hur MS, Chung IH, Kim S, Suh JS, et al. Anatomic variations and MRI of the intermalleolar ligament. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):943–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Dimmick S, Linklater J. Ankle impingement syndromes. Radiol Clin N Am. 2013;51(3):479–510.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mc DA. The os trigonum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1955;37-b(2):257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Quirk R. Common foot and ankle injuries in dance. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(1):123–33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Linklater J. MR imaging of ankle impingement lesions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17(4):775–800, vii–viii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Datir A, Connell D. Imaging of impingement lesions in the ankle. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;21(1):15–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hamilton WG. Foot and ankle injuries in dancers. Clin Sports Med. 1988;7(1):143–73.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ferkel R. Differential diagnosis of chronic ankle sprain pain in the athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 1994;2:274–83.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Russo A, Zappia M, Reginelli A, Carfora M, D’Agosto GF, La Porta M, et al. Ankle impingement: a review of multimodality imaging approach. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013;97(Suppl 2):S161–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ogut T, Ayhan E, Irgit K, Sarikaya AI. Endoscopic treatment of posterior ankle pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(8):1355–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lui TH. Arthroscopic management of posteromedial ankle impingement. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(5):e425–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lui TH. Posterior ankle impingement syndrome caused by malunion of joint depressed type calcaneal fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(7):687–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Shepherd FJ. A hitherto undescribed fracture of the astragalus. J Anat Physiol. 1882;17(Pt 1):79–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Messiou C, Robinson P, O’Connor PJ, Grainger A. Subacute posteromedial impingement of the ankle in athletes: MR imaging evaluation and ultrasound guided therapy. Skelet Radiol. 2006;35(2):88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Giannini S, Buda R, Mosca M, Parma A, Di Caprio F. Posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(3):459–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Koulouris G, Connell D, Schneider T, Edwards W. Posterior tibiotalar ligament injury resulting in posteromedial impingement. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(8):575–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Yilmaz C, Eskandari MM. Arthroscopic excision of the talar Stieda’s process. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(2):225.e1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Brodsky AE, Khalil MA. Talar compression syndrome. Foot Ankle. 1987;7(6):338–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Fiorella D, Helms CA, Nunley JA. The MR imaging features of the posterior intermalleolar ligament in patients with posterior impingement syndrome of the ankle. Skelet Radiol. 1999;28(10):573–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Gasparetto F, Collo G, Pisanu G, Villella D, Drocco L, Cerlon R, et al. Posterior ankle and subtalar arthroscopy: indications, technique, and results. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(2):164–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Paterson RS, Brown JN. The posteromedial impingement lesion of the ankle. A series of six cases. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):550–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hedrick MR, McBryde AM. Posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(1):2–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Abramowitz Y, Wollstein R, Barzilay Y, London E, Matan Y, Shabat S, et al. Outcome of resection of a symptomatic os trigonum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-a(6):1051–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Marumoto JM, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic excision of the os trigonum: a new technique with preliminary clinical results. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(12):777–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Willits K, Sonneveld H, Amendola A, Giffin JR, Griffin S, Fowler PJ. Outcome of posterior ankle arthroscopy for hindfoot impingement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):196–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Calder JD, Sexton SA, Pearce CJ. Return to training and playing after posterior ankle arthroscopy for posterior impingement in elite professional soccer. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):120–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Scholten PE, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN. Hindfoot endoscopy for posterior ankle impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2665–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    van Dijk CN. Hindfoot endoscopy. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(2):391–414.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R. A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(8):871–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Lui TH. Decompression of posterior ankle impingement with concomitant anterior ankle pathology by posterior ankle arthroscopy in the supine position. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5(5):e1191–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Wiegerinck JI, Vroemen JC, van Dongen TH, Sierevelt IN, Maas M, van Dijk CN. The posterior impingement view: an alternative conventional projection to detect bony posterior ankle impingement. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(10):1311–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Lui TH. Flexor hallucis longus tendoscopy: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(1):107–10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Lui TH, Chan LK. The safety of the posterior ankle arthroscopy in management of posterior ankle impingement: a cadaveric study. Foot. 2016;27:4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Glazebrook MA, Arsenault K, Dunbar M. Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(10):945–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Gadd RJ, Barwick TW, Paling E, et al. Assessment of a three-grade classification of complications in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(5):434–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Bartel AF, Roukis TS. Total ankle replacement survival rates based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of national joint registry data. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015;32(4):483–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Roukis TS, Bartel AF. Survivorship of first-, second-, and third-generation total ankle replacement systems, chapter 2. In: Roukis TS, Berlet GC, Bibbo C, Hyer CF, Penner MJ, Wünschel M, editors. Primary and revision total ankle replacement. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Failure and success of current total ankle replacements used in the United States, chapter 23. In: Roukis TS, Berlet GC, Bibbo C, Hyer CF, Penner MJ, Wünschel M, editors. Primary and revision total ankle replacement. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Kurup HV, Taylor GR. Medial impingement after ankle replacement. Int Orthop. 2008;32(2):243–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Hess GW. Ankle impingement syndromes: a review of etiology and related implications. Foot Ankle Spec. 2011;4(5):290–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Rippstein PF, Huber M, Naal FD. Management of specific complications related to total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(4):707–17.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Kim BS, Choi WJ, Kim J, et al. Residual pain due to soft-tissue impingement after uncomplicated total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2013;95(3):378–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Schuberth JM, Babu NS, Richey JM, et al. Gutter impingement after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(3):329–37.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Pagenstert G, Horisberger M, Leumann AG, et al. Distinctive pain course during first year after total ankle arthroplasty: a prospective, observational study. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(2):113–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Shirzad K, Viens NA, DeOrio JK. Arthroscopic treatment of impingement after total ankle arthroplasty: technique tip. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(7):727–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Richardson AB, DeOrio JK, Parekh SG. Arthroscopic debridement: effective treatment for impingement after total ankle arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(2):171–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Bevernage BD, Deleu P-A, Birch I, et al. Arthroscopic debridement after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37:142–9. Scholar
  116. 116.
    Kim BS, Lee JW. Arthroscopic debridement for soft-tissue impingement after total ankle replacement, chapter 18. In: Roukis TS, Berlet GC, Bibbo C, Hyer CF, Penner MJ, Wünschel M, editors. Primary and revision total ankle replacement. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 211–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Overley BD Jr, Beideman TC. Managing heterotopic ossification after total ankle replacement, chapter 19. In: Roukis TS, Berlet GC, Bibbo C, Hyer CF, Penner MJ, Wünschel M, editors. Primary and revision total ankle replacement. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Bevernage BD, Deleu P-A, Kurup HV, et al. Management of painful malleolar gutters after total ankle replacement, chapter 20. In: Roukis TS, Berlet GC, Bibbo C, Hyer CF, Penner MJ, Wünschel M, editors. Primary and revision total ankle replacement. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Lee K-B, Cho YJ, Park JK, et al. Heterotopic ossification after primary total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(8):751–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Lui TH, Roukis TS. Arthroscopic management of complications following total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015;32(4):495–508.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Bestic JM, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, et al. Postoperative imaging of the total ankle arthroplasty. Radiol Clin North Am. 2008;46(6):1003–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    LiMarzi GM, Fursevich DM, Cole JD, et al. Imaging of ankle replacements. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19(1):67–76.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Frigg A, Nigg B, Hinz L, et al. Clinical relevance of hindfoot alignment view in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(10):871–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Ajis A, Henriquez H, Myerson M. Postoperative range of motion trends following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(5):645–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Gaudot F, Colombier JA, Bonnin M, et al. A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(2):131–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Kohonen I, Koivu H, Vahlberg T, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty: optimizing computed tomography imaging protocol. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42(11):1507–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Chicklore S, Chicklore S, Gnanasegaran G, et al. Potential role of multi-slice SPECT/CT in impingement syndrome and soft-tissue pathology of the ankle and foot. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34(2):130–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Mason LW, Wyatt J, Butcher C, et al. Single-photon-emission computed tomography in painful total ankle replacements. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(6):635–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Sun YQ, Slesarenko YA. Joint distraction may be unnecessary in ankle arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2006;29(2):118–20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Lozano-Calderón SA, Samocha Y, McWilliam J. Comparative performance of ankle arthroscopy with and without traction. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(9):740–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Roukis TS. Bacterial skin contamination before and after surgical preparation of the foot, ankle and lower leg in patients with diabetes and intact skin versus patients with diabetes and ulceration: a prospective controlled therapeutic study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(4):348–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Deng DF, Hamilton GA, Lee M, et al. Complications associated with foot and ankle arthroscopy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(3):281–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    van Dijk CN. Complications is ankle arthroscopy, chapter 5. In: Ankle arthroscopy: techniques developed by the Amsterdam foot and ankle school. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Duscher D, Wenny R, Entenfellner J, et al. Cutaneous innervation of the ankle: an anatomical study showing danger zones for ankle surgery. Clin Anat. 2014;27(4):653–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Darland AM, Kadakia AR, Zeller JL. Branching patterns of the superficial peroneal nerve: implications for ankle arthroscopy and for anterolateral surgical approaches to the ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(3):332–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    van Dijk CN. Anterior ankle arthroscopy: general principles, chapter 6. In: Ankle arthroscopy: techniques developed by the Amsterdam foot and ankle school. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Marsland D, Dray A, Little NJ, et al. The saphenous nerve in foot and ankle surgery: its variable anatomy and relevance. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(2):76–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Bai L, Han YN, Zhang WT, et al. Natural history of sensory nerve recovery after cutaneous nerve injury following foot and ankle surgery. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10(1):99–103.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Vega J, Golanó P, Peña F. Iatrogenic articular cartilage injuries during ankle arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1304–10. Scholar
  140. 140.
    Webb ST, Ghosh S. Intra-articular bupivacaine: potentially chondrotoxic? Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(4):439–41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Chu CR, Coyle CH, Chu CT, et al. In vivo effects of single intra-articular injection of 0.5% bupivacaine on articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(3):599–608.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Arafah O, Penner MJ. The science behind periprosthetic aseptic osteolysis in total ankle replacement, chapter 16. In: Roukis TS, Berlet GC, Bibbo C, Hyer CF, Penner MJ, Wünschel M, editors. Primary and revision total ankle replacement. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Schade VL, Roukis TS. Use of a surgical preparation and sterile dressing change during office visit treatment of chronic foot and ankle wounds decreases the incidence of infection and treatment costs. Foot Ankle Spec. 2008;1(3):147–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Jones C, Rush S, Berlet GC, et al. Understanding the postoperative course and rehabilitation protocol for total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(3):203–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P, McKee MD, editors. Rockwood and green’s fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. Techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Ramsey PL, Hamilton W. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(3):356–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Stufkens SA, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Hintermann B, van Dijk CN. Long-term outcome after 1822 operatively treated ankle fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury. 2011;42(2):119–27.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Takao M, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Naito K, Kono T, Oae K. Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome associated with trauma. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):1061–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Loren GJ, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic assessment of occult intra-articualr injury in acute ankle fracture. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:412–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Stufkens SA, Knupp M, Horisberger M, Lampert C, Hintermann B. Cartilage lesions and the development of osteoarthritis after internal fixation of ankle fractures: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(2):279.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Chan KB, Lui TH. Role of ankle arthroscopy in management of acute ankle fracture. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2373–80.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    O’Neill PJ, Van Aman SE, Guyton GP. Is MRI adequate to detect lesions in patients with ankle instability? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1115–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Lui TH, Ip KY, Chow HT. Comparison of radiologic and arthroscopic diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption in acute ankle fracture. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1370–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):788–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Sherman TI, Casscells N, Rabe J, McGuigan FX. Ankle arthroscopy for ankle fractures. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(1):e75–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Schaier WW, Nwachukwu BU, Dare DM, Drakos MC. Arthroscopically assisted open reduction-internal fixation of ankle fractures: significance of the arthroscopic ankle drive-through sign. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5(2):e407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Lui TH, Chan KB, Kong CC, Ngai WK. Ankle stiffness after Bosworth fracture dislocation of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:49–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Fuchs DJ, Ho BS, LaBelle MW, Kelikian AS. Effect of arthroscopic evaluation of acute ankle fractures on PROMIS intermediate-term functional outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(1):51–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Takao M, Uchio Y, Naito K, Fukazawa I, Kakimaru T, Ochi M. Diagnosis and treatment of combined intra-articular disorders in acute distal fibular fractures. J Trauma. 2004;57(6):1303–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Labib SA, Magill M, Slone HS. Ankle arthroscopy for ankle fracture care. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;14(1):21–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Gonzalez TA, Macaulay AA, Ehrlichman LK, Drummond R, Mittal V, DiGiovanni CW. Arthroscopically assisted versus standard open reduction and internal fixation techniques for the acute ankle fracture. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(5):554–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Marcacci M, Filardo G, Kon E. Treatment of cartilage lesions: what works and why? Injury. 2013;44(Suppl 1):S11–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    van Dijk CN, Verhagen RA, Tol JL. Arthroscopy for problems after ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79-B:280–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Kon E, Filardo G, Berruto M, Benazzo F, Zanon G, Della Villa S, Marcacci M. Articular cartilage treatment in high-level male soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(12):2549–57.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gächter A. Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):345–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Ramponi L, Yasui Y, Murawski C, Ferkel RD, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GM, Calder JD, Takao M, Vannini F, Choi WJ, Lee JW, Stone J, Kennedy JG. Lesion size is a predictor of clinical outcomes after bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systemic review. Am J Sports Med. 2016;45:1698–705.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Cha SD, Kwak JY, Gwak HC, Cha SD, Kwak JY, Gwak HC, Ha DJ, Kim JY, Kim UC, Jang YC. Arthroscopic assessment of intra-articular lesion after surgery for rotational ankle fracture. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7:490–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Utsugi K, Sakai H, Hiraoka H, Yashiki M, Mogi H. Intra-articular fibrous tissue formation following ankle fracture: the significance of arthroscopic debridement of fibrous tissue. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(1):89–93.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Burns WC, Prakash K, Adelaar R, Beaudoin A, Krause W. Tibiotalar joint dynamics: indications of the syndesmotic screw: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(3):153–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Franke J, von Recum J, Suda AJ, Gruetzner PA, Wendl K. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1386–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Loren GJ, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic assessment of occult intra-articular injury in acute ankle fractures. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:412–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Ono A, Nishikawa S, Nagao A, Irie T, Sasaki M, Kouno T. Arthroscopically assisted treatment of ankle fractures: arthroscopic findings and surgical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:627–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Leontaritis N, Hinojosa L, Panchbhavi VK. Arthroscopically detected intra-articular lesions associated with acute ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:333–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Miller MD. Arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of an adult Tillaux fracture of the ankle. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:117–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Leetun DT, Ireland ML. Arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of a juvenile Tillaux fracture. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:427–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Thaunat M, Billot N, Bauer T, Hardy P. Arthroscopic treatment of a juvenile Tillaux fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:286–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Panagopoulos A, Van Niekerk L. Arthroscopic assisted reduction and fixation of a juvenile Tillaux fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:415–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Jennings MM, Lagaay P, Schuberth JM. Arthroscopic assisted fixation of juvenile intra-articular epiphyseal ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46:376–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Mcgillion S, Jackson M, Lahoti O. Arthroscopically assisted percutaneous fixation of triplane fracture of the distal tibia. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16:313–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Kim HS, Jahng JS, Kim SS, Chun CH, Han HJ. Treatment of tibial pilon fractures using ring fixators and arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;334:244–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Kralinger F, Lutz M, Wambacher M, Smekal V, Golser K. Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction and percutaneous screw fixation of a Pilon tibial fracture. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:E45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gächter A. Arthroscopic findings in acute ankle fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:345–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Thordarson DB, Bains R, Shepherd LE. The role of ankle arthroscopy on the surgical management of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:123–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Tearse DS. Treatment of displaced talus fractures: an arthroscopically assisted approach. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:630–3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Monllau JC, Pelfort X, Hinarejos P, Ballester J. Combined fracture of the talus: arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:418–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Subairy A, Subramanian K, Geary NP. Arthroscopically assisted internal fixation of a talus body fracture. Injury. 2004;35:86–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Dodd A, Simon D, Wilkinson R. Arthroscopically assisted transfibular talar dome fixation with a headless screw. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:806–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Ogut T, Seyahi A, Aydingoz O, Bilsel N. A two-portal endoscopic approach in the treatment of a complex talus fracture: a case report. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009;99:443–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Sariali E, Lelièvre JF, Catonné Y. Fractures et séquelles de fractures de l’apophyse latérale du talus. Etude rétrospective à propos de 44 cas. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94:145–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Rammelt S, Gavlik JM, Barthel M, Zwipp H. The value of subtalar arthroscopy in the management of intra-articular calcaneus fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:906–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1899–905.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Schneider D. Arthroscopic ankle fusion. Arthroscopic Video J. 1983;3:11.Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    Pakzad H, Thevendran G, Penner MJ, Qian H, Younger A. Factors associated with longer length of hospital stay after primary elective ankle surgery for end-stage ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(1):32–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    de Leeuw PA, Hendrickx RP, van Dijk CN, Stufkens SS, Kerkhoffs GM. Midterm results of posterior arthroscopic ankle fusion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1326–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Corso SJ, Zimmer TJ. Technique and clinical evaluation of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(5):585–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Gougoulias NE, Agathangelidis FG, Parsons SW. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(6):695–706.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Winson IG, Robinson DE, Allen PE. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(3):343–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Abicht BP, Roukis TS. Incidence of nonunion after isolated arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(5):949–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Peters PG, Parks BG, Schon LC. Anterior distal tibia plafondplasty for exposure of the talar dome. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(3):231–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Hendrickx RP, de Leeuw PA, Golano P, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM. Safety and efficiency of posterior arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(8):2420–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Yasui Y, Hannon CP, Seow D, Kennedy JG. Ankle arthrodesis: a systematic approach and review of the literature. World J Orthop. 2016;7(11):700–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Kerkhoffs GM, Hendrickx RP, Mallee W, de Leeuw PA, van Dijk C. Arthroscopic ankle fusion: the posterior approach. Orthop Knowl Online J. 2014;12:3.Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    Hermans JJ, et al. Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach. J Anat. 2010;217(6):633–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Leeds HC, Ehrlich MG. Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):490–503.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Kennedy JG, et al. Evaluation of the syndesmotic screw in low Weber C ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(5):359–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Weening B, Bhandari M. Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(2):102–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Lui TH. Tri-ligamentous reconstruction of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a minimally invasive approach. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(5):495–500.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Reckling FW, McNamara GR, DeSmet AA. Problems in the diagnosis and treatment of ankle injuries. J Trauma. 1981;21(11):943–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):439–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Beumer A, et al. Late reconstruction of the anterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: good outcome in 9 patients. Acta Orthop. 2000;71(5):519–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Grass R, et al. Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(5):392–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC. Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: diagnosis and treatment by arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(5):561–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Harper MC. Delayed reduction and stabilization of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(1):15–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Morris MW, Rice P, Schneider TE. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis reconstruction using a free hamstring autograft. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(6):506–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Wagener ML, Beumer A, Swierstra BA. Chronic instability of the anterior tibiofibular syndesmosis of the ankle. Arthroscopic findings and results of anatomical reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:212.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Yasui Y, et al. Anatomical reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament for chronic disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(4):691–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Valkering KP, Vergroesen DA, Nolte PA. Isolated syndesmosis ankle injury. Orthopedics. 2012;35(12):e1705–10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Espinosa N, Smerek JP, Myerson MS. Acute and chronic syndesmosis injuries: pathomechanisms, diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(3):639–57.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Pena FA, Coetzee JC. Ankle syndesmosis injuries. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(1):35–50, viii.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Olson KM, Dairyko GH Jr, Toolan BC. Salvage of chronic instability of the syndesmosis with distal tibiofibular arthrodesis: functional and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(1):66–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    Kelikian HKS. Disorders of the ankle. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1985.Google Scholar
  224. 224.
    Stoller DW. Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedics and sports medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007.Google Scholar
  225. 225.
    Miller AN, et al. Posterior malleolar stabilization of syndesmotic injuries is equivalent to screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):1129–35.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    Lee SH, et al. Ligaments of the ankle: normal anatomy with MR arthrography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22(5):807–13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Peter RE, et al. Biomechanical effects of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(3):215–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    Beumer A, et al. Kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: radiostereometry in 11 normal ankles. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(3):337–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    Scranton PE Jr, McMaster JG, Kelly E. Dynamic fibular function: a new concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;118:76–81.Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    Thomas KA, et al. The effects of the interosseous membrane and partial fibulectomy on loading of the tibia: a biomechanical study. Orthopedics. 1995;18(4):373–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  231. 231.
    Skraba JS, Greenwald AS. The role of the interosseous membrane on tibiofibular weightbearing. Foot Ankle. 1984;4(6):301–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    Beumer A, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of the tibiofibular and tibiotalar ligaments of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(5):426–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    Brostroem L. Sprained ankles. I. Anatomic lesions in recent sprains. Acta Chir Scand. 1964;128:483–95.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  234. 234.
    Hopkinson WJ, et al. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1990;10(6):325–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(3):294–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  236. 236.
    Xenos JS, et al. The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(6):847–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    Riegels-Nielsen P, Christensen J, Greiff J. The stability of the tibio-fibular syndesmosis following rigid internal fixation for type C malleolar fractures: an experimental and clinical study. Injury. 1983;14(4):357–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  238. 238.
    Ramasamy P, Ward A. Distal tibiofibular joint dislocation with an intact fibula: a classification system. Injury. 2003;34(11):862–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  239. 239.
    Close JR. Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38-a(4):761–81.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    Burns WC, et al. Tibiotalar joint dynamics: indications for the syndesmotic screw--a cadaver study. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(3):153–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    Menelaus MB. Injuries of the anterior inferior tibio-fibular ligament. Aust N Z J Surg. 1961;30:279–87.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  242. 242.
    Beumer A, et al. Late reconstruction of the anterior tibiofibular syndesmosis for ankle diastasis with talar shift in a 12-year-old boy. A case report. Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;11(1):49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Katznelson A, Lin E, Militiano J. Ruptures of the ligaments about the tibio-fibular syndesmosis. Injury. 1983;15(3):170–2.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  244. 244.
    Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R. Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13(4):611–33. vii–viiiPubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  245. 245.
    Vincelette P, Laurin CA, Levesque HP. The footballer’s ankle and foot. Can Med Assoc J. 1972;107(9):872–4. passimPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  246. 246.
    Taylor DC, Englehardt DL, Bassett FH. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. The influence of heterotopic ossification. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):146–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  247. 247.
    Lui TH. Endoscopic distal tibiofibular syndesmosis arthrodesis. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5(2):e419–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. 248.
    Lui TH. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(5):953–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  249. 249.
    Lui TH, Ip K, Chow HT. Comparison of radiologic and arthroscopic diagnoses of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption in acute ankle fracture. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1370.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  250. 250.
    Lui TH, Chan KB, Ngai WK. Premature closure of distal fibular growth plate: a case of longitudinal syndesmosis instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(1):45–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Yeo
    • 1
  • Alastair Younger
    • 1
  • Andie Veljkovic
    • 1
  • Feras Waly
    • 2
  • Andrea Veljkovic
    • 1
  • Yinghui Hua
    • 3
  • Shiyi Chen
    • 3
  • Chi Pan Yuen
    • 4
  • Tun Hing Lui
    • 5
  • Thomas S. Roukis
    • 6
  • Shek Ng
    • 5
  • Thomas Bauer
    • 7
  • Peter A. J. de Leeuw
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10
    • 11
  • Jan Ophuis
    • 8
  • Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs
    • 8
    • 10
    • 11
    • 12
  1. 1.St Paul’s Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Sports MedicineHuashan Hospital, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  5. 5.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyNorth District HospitalHong KongChina
  6. 6.Orthopaedic Center, Gundersen Health SystemLa CrosseUSA
  7. 7.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAmbroise Paré Hospital – West Paris UniversityBoulogneFrance
  8. 8.Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  9. 9.Flevoziekenhuis, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAlmereThe Netherlands
  10. 10.Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  11. 11.Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  12. 12.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOrthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations