Advertisement

Reproduction in the Shoot and Fruit Borer, Conogethes spp. (Crambidae: Lepidoptera): Strategizing Survival?

  • M. A. Rashmi
  • A. K. Chakravarthy
  • S. R. Kulkarni
Chapter

Abstract

The neurohormonal regulatory process in Conogethes reproductive system is poorly understood. This has impeded research on bioecology and management of pest species of Conogethes. The reproduction in Conogethes is physiologically complex embracing from other factors the influence of light, sound, plant odors, and hormones. The process is quite elaborate and requires in-depth, comprehensive studies.

Keywords

Conogethes spp. Reproduction Calling behavior Mating Oviposition 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Authors thank the sources from where the certain figures and data for the chapter were derived, the authorities of the University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, and the MPKV, Rahuri, for encouragement and facilities.

References

  1. Agee HR (1969) Acoustic sensitivity of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubialis. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:1364–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcock J, Gwynne DT, Dadour IR (1989) Acoustic signalling, territoriality and mating in whistling moths, Hecatesia thyridion (Agaristidae). J Insect Behav 2:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ando T, Inomata S, Yamamoto M (2004) Lepidopteran sex pheromones. Top Curr Chem 239:51–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey NW, Zuk M (2008) Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2645–2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey NW, Gray B, Zuk M (2010) Acoustic experience shapes alternative mating tactics and reproductive investment in field crickets. Curr Biol 20:845–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barth M, Hirsch HVB, Heisenberg M (1997a) Rearing in different light regimes affects courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 53:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barth M, Hirsch HVB, Meinertzhagen IA, Heisenberg M (1997b) Experience-dependent developmental plasticity in the optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci 17:1493–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blest AD, Collett TS, Pye JD (1963) The generation of ultrasonic signals by a New World arctiid moth. Proc R Soc Lond B 158:196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bush GL (1975) Modes of speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 6:339–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conner WE (1987) Ultrasound: its role in the courtship of the arctiid moth, Cycnia tenera. Experientia 43:1029–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conner WE (1999) Un chant d’appel amoureaux’: acoustic communication in moths. J Exp Biol 202:1711–1723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coro F (1973) Morfologia del organo timpanico de la polilla del arroz, Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Galleriidae). Ciene Bioi 45:1–15Google Scholar
  13. Díaz-Fleischer F, Arredondo J (2011) Light conditions affect sexual performance in a lekking tephritid fruit fly. J Exp Biol 214:2595–2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endler JA (1993a) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 340:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Endler JA (1993b) The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecol Monogr 63:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forrest TG (1983) Calling songs and mate choice in mole crickets. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems: sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 185–204Google Scholar
  17. Fuller RC (2002) Lighting environment predicts the relative abundance of male colour morphs in bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei) populations. Proc R Soc B 269:1457–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gamble S, Lindholm AK, Endler JA, Brooks R (2003) Environmental variation and the maintenance of polymorphism: the effect of ambient light spectrum on mating behaviour and sexual selection in guppies. Ecol Lett 6:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenfield MD (2002) Signallers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenfield MD, Weber T (2000) Evolution of ultrasonic signalling in wax moths: discrimination of ultrasonic mating calls from bat echolocation signals and the exploitation of an antipredator receiver bias by sexual advertisement. Ethol Ecol Evol 12:259–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gwynne DT, Edwards ED (1986) Ultrasound production by genital stridulation in Syntonarcha iriastis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): long distance signalling by male moths? Zool J Linn Soc 88:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heller KG, Achmann R (1993) The ultrasonic song of the moth Amyna natalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Acontiinae). Bioacoustics 5:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heller KG, Krahe R (1994) Sound production and hearing in the pyralid moth Symmoracma minoralis. J Exp Biol 187:101–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirsch HVB, Tompkins L (1994) The flexible fly: experience dependent development of complex behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 195:1–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirsch HVB, Barth M, Luo S, Sambaziotis H, Huber M, Possidente D, Ghiradella H, Tompkins L (1995) Early visual experience affects mate choice of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 50:1211–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Honda, Mitsuhashi (1989) Morphological and morphometric differences between the fruit and pinaceae-feeding type of yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 24(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Honda H, Ishiwatari T, Matsumoto Y (1988) Fungal volatiles as oviposition attractants for the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Insect Physiol 34:211–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hou ML, Sheng CF (2000) Calling behaviour of adult female Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lep., Noctuidae) of overwintering generation and effects of mating. J Appl Entomol 124:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inoue H, Yamanaka H (2006) Redescription of Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) and description of two new closely allied species from Eastern Palaearctic and Oriental regions (Pyralidae, Pyraustinae). Tinea 19:80–91Google Scholar
  30. Jang Y, Greenfield MD (1996) Ultrasonic communication and sexual selection in wax moths: female choice based on energy and asynchrony of male signals. Anim Behav 51:1095–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jia F-Y, Greenfield MD, Collins RD (2001) Ultrasonic signal competition between male wax moths. J Insect Behav 14:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaneko J (1978) Abdominal constriction in the copulated female of yellow peach moth, Dichocrocis punctiferalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 13:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kimura T, Honda H (1999) Identification and possible functions of the hairpencil scent of the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 34:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kimura T, Honda H (2002) Microstructure and pheromone producing function of male hair-pencils in the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Entomol Sci 5:237–247Google Scholar
  35. Kingan TG, Thomas-Laemont PA, Raina AK (1993) Male accessory gland factors elicit change from ‘virgin’ to ‘mated’ behavior in the female corn earworm moth Helicoverpa zea. J Exp Biol 183:61–76Google Scholar
  36. Konno Y (1986) Time-lag between sex pheromone content and the calling behavior in the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 21:622–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Konno Y, Tanaka F (1996) Mating time of the rice-feeding and water-oat-feeding strains of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). – Japan. J Appl Entomol Zool 40:245–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Konno Y, Honda H, Matsumoto Y (1980) Observations on the mating behavior and bioassay for the sex pheromone of the yellow peach moth, Dichocrocis punctiferalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 15:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Konno Y, Arai K, Sekiguchi K, Matsumoto Y (1982) (E)-10- Hexadecenal, a sex pheromone component of the yellow peach moth, Dichocrocis punctiferalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 17:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Konno Y, Honda N, Matsumoto Y (1981) Mechanism of reproductive isolation between the fruit feeding and pin ace feeding type of yellow peach moth, Dichocrosis punctiferalis. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 25:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krasnoff SB, Yager DD (1988) Acoustic response to a pheromonal cue in the arctiid moth Pyrrharctia isabella. Physiol Entomol 13:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Minnich DE (1936) The response of caterpillars to sound. J Exp Zool 72:439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mullen MA, Tsao CH (1971) Tympanic organ of Indian-meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hubner), almond moth, Cadra calttella (Walker) and tobacco moth, Ephestia elutella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 1:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakano R, Ishikawa Y, Tatsuki S, Surlykke A, Skals N, Takanashi T (2006) Ultrasonic courtship song in the Asian corn borer moth, Ostrinia furnacalis. Naturwissenschaften 93:292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakano R, Skals N, Takanashi T (2008) Moths produce extremely quiet ultrasonic courtship songs by rubbing specialized scales. In: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol 105, pp 11812–11817Google Scholar
  46. Nakano R, Takanashi T, Fujii T (2009a) Moths are not silent, but whisper ultrasonic courtship songs. J Exp Biol 212:4072–4078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nakano R, Ishikawa Y, Tatsuki S (2009b) Private ultrasonic whispering in moths. Commun Integr Biol 2:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nakano R, Takanashi T, Skals N, Surlykke A, Ishikawa Y (2010) Ultrasonic courtship songs of male Asian corn borer moths assist copulation attempts by making the females motionless. Physiol Entomol 35:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nakano R, Takanashi T, Ihara F, Mishiro K, Toyama M, Ishikawa Y (2012) Ultrasonic courtship song of the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Appl Entomol Zool 47:87–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-012-0092-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nakano R, Ihara F, Mishiro K, Toyama M, Toda S (2014) Double meaning of courtship song in a moth. Proc R Soc B 281:20140840.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0840 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nakano R, Takanashi T, Surlykke A (2015) Moth hearing and sound communication. J Comp Physiol A 201:111–121.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0945-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nalnabdov AV (1970) Reproductive physiology. R.J. Taraprorerala and Sons Com, Bombay, p 316Google Scholar
  53. Raikhel AS, Brown MR, Belles X (2005) Hormonal control of reproductive processes. In: Hormones, brain and behavior. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 433–491Google Scholar
  54. Rajabaskar D, Regupathy A (2012) Calling behaviour and attractive response of cardamom shoot and capsule borer, Conogethes punctiferalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to the female crude extract and synthetic blend. J Entomol 2012:1–6Google Scholar
  55. Reinhold K, Greenfield MD, Jang Y, Broce A (1998) Energetic cost of sexual attractiveness: ultrasonic advertisement in wax moths. Anim Behav 55:905–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roeder KD (1972) Acoustic and mechanical sensitivity of the distal lobe of the pilifer in choerocampine hawkmoths. J Insect Physiol 18:1249–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roeder KD, Treat AE (1970) An acoustic sense in some hawkmoths (Choerocampinae). J Insect Physiol 16:1069–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roeder KD, Treat AE, Vandeberg JS (1968) Auditory sense in certain sphingid moths. Science 159:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan MJ (1990) Sensory systems, sexual selection, and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 7:157–195Google Scholar
  60. Ryan MJ (1998) Receiver biases, sexual selection and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281:1999–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryan MJ (2007) Sensory ecology: see me, hear me. Curr Biol 17:R1019–R1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryder JJ, Siva-Jothy MT (2000) Male calling song provides a reliable signal of immune function in a cricket. Proc R Soc London Ser Biol Sci 267:1171–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sanderford MV, Conner WE (1995) Acoustic courtship communication in Syntomeida epilais Wlk. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae, Ctenuchinae). J Insect Behav 8:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sanderford MV, Coro F, Conner WE (1998) Courtship behavior in Empyreuma affinis Roths. (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Ctenuchinae): acoustic signals and tympanic organ response. Naturwissenschaften 85:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Satyanarayana K, Bradfield JY, Bhaskaran G, Dahm KH (1994) Stimulation of Vitellogenin production by methoprene in prepupae and pupae of Manduca sexta. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 25:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Seol KY, Honda H, Matsumoto Y (1986) Mating-behavior and the sexpheromone of the lesser mulberry pyralid, Glyphodes pyloalis Walker (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Appl Entomol Zool 21:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shanuowr TG, Gutierrez AP, Wightman JA (1993) Effect of temperature on development rates, fecundity & longevity of the groundnut leaf miner, Aproaerema modicella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), in India. Bull Entomol Res 83(3):413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shashank RP (2012) Biosystematics and pheromone components of Conogethes punctiferalis (Guénee) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) with special reference to populations infesting castor (Ricinus communis L.) and cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton), Ph.D thesis, UAS, Bangalore, p 66Google Scholar
  69. Shashank RP, Chakravarthy AK, Chandrashekharaiah R, Bhanu KRM (2014) Behavioural studies on Shoot and Fruit Borer, Conogethes punctiferalis, Guenée, (Crambidae: Lepidoptera) host-associated populations reveal occurrence of cryptic species. Entomologia Generalis 35(2):103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shirk PD, Zimowska G, Silhacek DL, Shaaya E (1992) Initiation of vitellogenesis in pharate adult females of Indian-meal moth, Plodia interpuntella. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 21:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shu S, Park YI, Ramaswamy SB, Srinivasan A (1997) Hemolymph juvenile hormone titers in pupal and adult stages of southwestern corn borer (Diatraea grandiosella (Pyralidae)) and relationship with egg development. J Insect Physiol 43:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Simmons RB, Conner WE (1996) Ultrasonic signals in the defense and courtship of Euchaetes egle Drury and E. bolteri Stretch (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J Insect Behav 9:909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sithanantham S, Subramaniam TR (1975) Sex determination of pupae of sorghum stalk borer, Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe). Madras Agric J 62(2):62–63Google Scholar
  74. Spangler HG (1985) Sound production and communication by the greater wax moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spangler HG (1987) High-frequency sound production by honey bees. J Apic Res 25:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spangler HG (1988) Ultrasonic communication in Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Stored Prod Res 23:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spangler HG, Greenfield MD, Takessian A (1984) Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth. Physiol Entomol 9:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Surlykke A, Gogala M (1986) Stridulation and hearing in the noctuid moth Thecophora fovea (Tr.). J Comp Physiol A 159:27–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Takanashi T, Nakano R, Surlykke A, Tatsuta H, Tabata J, Ishikawa Y, Skals N (2010) Variation in courtship ultrasounds of three Ostrinia moths with different sex pheromones. PLoS ONE 5:e13144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tautz J, Markl H (1978) Caterpillars detect flying wasps by hairs sensitive to airborne vibration. Behav Eco Sociobiol 4:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Von, Eggers P (1933) Die abdominal en Tympanalorgane der Lepidopteren. Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 57:1–104Google Scholar
  82. Wang LP, Ji BZ, Liu, Zhao ZP, Cao DD, Xu Z-X (2015) Anatomical study on the morphology of the reproductive systems and the scale brushes of Dioryctria rubella Hampson (Pyralidae: Phycitinae). J Lepidopterists Soc 69(1):50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolfram V, Juusola M (2004) Impact of rearing conditions and short-term light exposure on signaling performance in Drosophila photoreceptors. J Neurophysiol 92:1918–1927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhu J, Indrasith L, Yamashita O (1986) Characterization of vitellin, egg-specific protein and 30-kDa protein from Bombyx eggs, and their fates during oogenesis and embryogenesis. Biochem Biophys Acta 882:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zuk M, Kolluru GR (1998) Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q Rev Biol 73:415–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Rashmi
    • 1
  • A. K. Chakravarthy
    • 1
  • S. R. Kulkarni
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Entomology and NematologyICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyMahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV)Rahuri, AhmednagarIndia

Personalised recommendations