Advertisement

India’s ‘Informal Sector’: Demystifying a Problematic Concept

  • Timothy Kerswell
  • Surendra Pratap
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of the informal sector has come to prominence, particularly after India’s liberalization. This chapter demystifies the idea of informality in India, revealing the multilayered existence of various groups of workers in vulnerable positions which are the product of India’s history and political economy. Accordingly, certain interventions can transform the lives of India’s unorganized workers, but such policy would need to target the specific needs of each unorganized group of workers. The concept and discourse of the informal sectors imply the permanence of unorganized, unregulated work. Conceptualizing Indian labor in this way leads to a position that the state should provide welfare measures to help workers survive at a bare minimum level, and a fundamental failure to address structural causes of workers’ vulnerabilities.

References

  1. ACTRAV. 2011. From precarious work to decent work. Policies and regulations to combat precarious employment. ILO: Geneva. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---actrav/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_164286.pdf
  2. Agarwala, Rina. 2013. Informal Labor, Formal Politics and Dignified Discontent in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amritpal. 2014. A Report on Ludhiana textile workers strikes and the owners’ propaganda. Available from: http://sanhati.com/articles/4246/
  4. Basole, A and Basu, D. 2010. Relations of production and modes of surplus extraction in India. Working Paper no. 109, Economics Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst. Available from: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1108&context=econ_workingpaper
  5. Basu, D & Das, D. 2008. Political economy of contemporary India: some comments on Partha Chatterjee’s theoretical framework. Available from: http://sanhati.com/excerpted/1045/#sthash.p13ZNUKk.dpuf
  6. Bellamy Foster, J. 2008. The financialization of capital and the crisis. Monthly Review, Vol. 59, No. 11. p1Google Scholar
  7. Chen, MA & Vanek, J. 2013. Informal employment revisited: theories, data & policies. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. Vol. 48, No. 3. pp390–401Google Scholar
  8. Foster-Carter, A. 1978. The modes of production controversy. New Left Review. Vol. I, No. 107. pp47–78Google Scholar
  9. Government of India. 1969. The Report of National Commission on Labour. Ministry of Labour and Employment and Rehabilitation, Available from: https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/iit/National%20Commission%20on%20Labour%20Report.pdf
  10. Government of India. 2002. The report of Second National Commission on Labour; Ministry of Labour and Employment, Available from: http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/1237548159/NLCII-report.pdf
  11. Government of India. 2013. Draft National Land Reforms Policy 2013. Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Available from: http://dolr.nic.in/dolr/downloads/pdfs/Draft_National_Land_Reforms_Policy_July_2013.pdf
  12. Harvey, David. 2010. The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  13. Holdcroft, J. 2013. Implications for union work of the trend towards precarization of work. International Journal of Labour Research. Vol. 5, No. 1. pp41–57Google Scholar
  14. International Labour Organization. 1972. Employment, Wages and Equity: A Strategy for Increasing Productive Employment in Kenya. International Labour Office: Geneva.Google Scholar
  15. International Labour Organization. 1991. The dilemma of the informal sector. Report of the Director General (Part I) to the International Labour Conference 78th Session, International Labour Office: Geneva.Google Scholar
  16. International Labour Organization. 2007. Background document, Tripartite Interregional Symposium on the Informal Economy: Enabling Transition to Formalization. International Labour Office: Geneva.Google Scholar
  17. International Labour Organization. 2015. Transition from the Informal to Formal Economy Recommendation, 2015 (No. 204). 104th ILC session, 12 June 2015, Geneva, Available from: http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:R204
  18. ITUC. 2012. Annual survey of violations of trade union rights. Available from: http://survey.ituc-csi.org/India.html?lang=en
  19. Kalshian, R. 2007. Caterpillar and the Mahua Flower: Tremors in India’s Mining Fields. Panos South Asia: New Delhi. Available from: www.panossouthasia.org
  20. Kar, G. 2012. The Semi-Feudal Character of Indian Agriculture. Available from: http://sanhati.com/excerpted/8197/
  21. Kerswell, T &Pratap, S. 2015. Informality in automobile value chains in India. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society. Vol. 18, No. 4. pp533–553Google Scholar
  22. Lahiri, S. 1998. Imperialist globalisation of the Indian seas and the fishworkers Struggles. Revolutionary Democracy. Vol. IV, No. 2. Available from: http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv4n2/fishwork.htm
  23. Marin, E. 2013. Precarious work: an international problem. International Journal of Labour Research. Vol.5, No.1. p153Google Scholar
  24. National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector. 2007. The report on conditions of work and promotion of livelihoods in unorganized sector. Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  25. National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector. 2009. The challenge of employment in India, an informal economy perspective. National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector, Government of India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  26. Papola TS & Sahu, PP. 2012. Growth and structure of employment in India: long-term and post-reform performance and the emerging challenge. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  27. Patnaik, P. 1999. Capitalism in Asia at the end of the millennium. Monthly Review. July–August.Google Scholar
  28. Patnaik, P. 2006. The need to protect petty production. Available from: http://www.macroscan.com/anl/jul06/pdf/Petty_Production.pdf
  29. Patnaik, P. 2009. Socialism and the Peasantry. Social Scientist, Vol. 37, Iss 11/12.Google Scholar
  30. Pratap, S. 2014. Emerging trends in factory Asia: international capital mobility, global value chains, and the labour movement. Asia Monitor Resource Centre: Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  31. Pratap, S. 2015a. The political economy of labour law reforms in India—part I. Available from: http://sanhati.com/excerpted/13633/
  32. Pratap, S. 2015b. The political economy of labour law reforms in India—part II. Available from: http://sanhati.com/excerpted/13633/
  33. Pratap, S. 2015c. The political economy of labour law reforms in India—part III. Available from: http://sanhati.com/excerpted/13633/
  34. Pratap, S. 2015d. The informality and precarious work in production chain capitalism: A case study of automobile industry in India. Asian Labour Journal. Vol 1Google Scholar
  35. Rossman, P. 2013. Establishing rights in the disposable jobs regime. International Journal of Labour Research. Vol.5, no.1. p31Google Scholar
  36. Sinha, Ashish. 2011. Jairam Ramesh keen to bring Land Reforms Bill in Parliament, India Today. Available from: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jairam-ramesh-keen-to-bring-land-reforms-bill/1/150949.html
  37. Staff Reporter. 2013. Wazirpur hot-rolling steel plant workers call off strike. The Hindu. Available from: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/wazirpur-hotrolling-steel-plant-workers-call-off-strike/article4628854.ece
  38. Wallerstein, I. 2009. Crisis of the capitalist system: where do we go from here? Available from: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2009/wallerstein121109.html

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy Kerswell
    • 1
  • Surendra Pratap
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Government and Public AdministrationUniversity of MacauTaipaMacao
  2. 2.Center for Workers EducationNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations