Advertisement

Introduction: Urban Ethics in the Anthropocene

  • Jeffrey K. H. Chan
Chapter

Abstract

Increasingly, people are living in an environment of their own making. For more than half of the global population, this environment is thoroughly urban in nature. How does the urban condition then impact the human condition? How does the making of the city, in response to the challenges of the Anthropocene, produce new ethical categories, moral relations, and consequences? To address these questions, urban ethics is needed. The chapter then proceeds to review the literature that underpins urban ethics through the following five vectors, namely: (i) the just city movement; (ii) the urban turn in ethics; (iii) the ethics of the built environment; (iv) environmental design and behavior; (v) the Anthropocene. Following this, a brief overview of each chapter of the book is provided.

Keywords

City Anthropocene Urban ethics Environmental design Urbanization Built environment 

References

  1. Aicher, O. (1994). The world as design. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, A. (2006). The good city. Urban Studies, 43(5/6), 1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (2003). Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, B. F. D., Horne, R., & Fien. J. (2016). The ethical city: A rationale for an urgent new urban agenda. Sustainability, 8(11) (1197), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barringer, F. (2014, November 10). Preserving an accident, the Salton Sea in California, for the good of nature. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/us/-salton-sea-migrating-birds-preserving-a-mistake-made-by-our-meddling-with-nature-.html.
  6. Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z. (2003). City of fears, city of hopes. London: Goldsmiths College.Google Scholar
  8. Bell, D. A., & De-Shalit, A. (2011). The spirit of cities: Why the identity of a city matters in a global age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J. B. (2016). The shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, history and us. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Brenner, N. (2012). What is critical urban theory? In N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, & M. Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city (pp. 11–23). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Brenner, N. (2013a). Theses on urbanization. Public Culture, 25(1, 69), 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brenner, N. (2013b). Open city or the right to the city? TOPOS: The International Review of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design, 85, 42–45.Google Scholar
  13. Canniffe, E. (2006). Urban ethic: Design in the contemporary city. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Chan, J. K. H. (2018). Design ethics: Reflecting on the ethical dimensions of technology, sustainability, and responsibility in the Anthropocene. Design Studies, 54, 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Checker, M. (2011). Wiped out by the “Greenwave”: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City and Society, 23(2), 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunningham, D. (2005). The concept of metropolis: Philosophy and urban form. Radical Philosophy, 133, 13–25.Google Scholar
  17. Dalby, S. (2017). Anthropocene formations: Environmental security, geopolitics and disaster. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2–3), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, C. (2002). The New Urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design, 7(3), 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, B., & Reid, J. (2014). Resilient life: The art of living dangerously. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fox, W. (2000). Introduction: Ethics and the built environment. In W. Fox (Ed.), Ethics and the built environment (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Frankena, W. (1973). Ethics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Gans, H. J. (1968). People and plans: Essays on urban problems and solutions. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gillette, H. (2010). Civitas by design: Building better communities, from the Garden City to the New Urbanism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glasmeier, A., & Christopherson, S. (2015). Thinking about smart cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glover, J. (2012). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goldhagen, S. W. (2017). Welcome to your world: How the built environment shapes our lives. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  28. Graham, S. (2011). Cities under siege: The new military urbanism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Gunn, A. S. (1998). Rethinking communities: Environmental ethics in an urbanized world. Environmental Ethics, 20(4), 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capitalism and the crises of capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  31. Hösle, V. (2004). Morals and politics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ignatieff, M. (2014, January 31). The moral operating system of a global city: Los Angeles. Retrieved from https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/articles_papers_reports/0194.
  33. Ignatieff, M. (2017). The ordinary virtues: Moral order in a divided world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kelbaugh, D. (2001). Three urbanisms and the public realm. In J. Peponis, J. Winerman, & S. Bafna (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium 2001. Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 14.1–14.8.Google Scholar
  35. King, R. J. H. (2000). Environmental ethics and the built environment. Environmental Ethics, 22(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kip, M., Bieniok, M., Dellenbaugh, M., Muller, A. K., & Schwegmann, M. (2015). Seizing the (every)day: Welcome to the urban commons! In M. Dellenbaugh, M. Kip, M. Bieniok, A. K. Muller, & M. Schwegmann (Eds.), Urban commons: Moving beyond state and market (pp. 9–25). Basel: Birkhauser.Google Scholar
  37. Kirkman, R. (2010). The ethics of metropolitan growth: The future of our built environment. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  38. Kitchin, R. (2016). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 374. http://dx.doi/org10.1098/rsta.2016.0115.
  39. Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  40. Light, A. (2001). The urban blind spot in environmental ethics. Environmental Politics, 10(1), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Light, A., & Wellman, C. H. (2003). Urban environmental ethics. Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LMU. (n.d.). Urban ethics: How should one live in the city? Retrieved from http://www.en.urbane-ethiken.uni-muenchen.de/index.html.
  43. Margalit, A. (2010). On compromise and rotten compromises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mayer, M. (2010). Civic city cahier 1: Social movement in the (post-)neoliberal city. London: Bedford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Meagher, S. M. (2008). Introduction. In S. M. Meagher (Ed.), Philosophy and the city: Classic to contemporary writings (pp. 1–10). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mostafavi, M. (2017). Agonistic urbanism. In M. Mostafavi (Ed.), Ethics of the urban: The city and the spaces of the political (pp. 9–16). Zurich: Lars Muller.Google Scholar
  48. Mugerauer, R., & Manzo, L. (2008). Environmental dilemmas: Ethical decision making. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  49. OECD. (2015). The metropolitan century: Understanding urbanization and its consequences. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Owen, G. (2012). Move your city: Ethics, place and risk in the reconstruction of New Orleans. The International Journal of the Constructed Environment, 2(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parikka, J. (2005). The Anthrobscene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  52. Park, R. E. (1952). Human communities: The city and human ecology. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  53. Purdy, J. (2015). After nature: A politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21st century. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  56. Sassen, S. (2017). Beyond differences of race, religion, class: Making urban subjects. In M. Mostafavi (Ed.), Ethics of the urban: The city and the spaces of the political (pp. 35–46). Zurich: Lars Muller.Google Scholar
  57. Schmelzkopf, K. (2002). Incommensurability, land use, and the right to space: Community gardens in New York City. Urban Geography, 23(4), 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmidt, J. J., Brown, P. G., & Orr, C. J. (2016). Ethics in the Anthropocene: A research agenda. The Anthropocene Review, 3(3), 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schrijver, L. (2015). Design for values in architecture. In J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains (pp. 589–611). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sennett, R. (2005). Capitalism and the city: Globalization, flexibility, and indifference. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Cities of Europe: Changing contexts, local arrangements, and the challenge to urban cohesion (pp. 109–122). Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Smithson, R. (1973). Entropy made visible: Interview with Alison Sky. Retrieved from https://www.robertsmithson.com/essays/entropy.htm.
  63. Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sorkin, M. (1999). Introduction: Traffic in democracy. In J. Copjec & M. Sorkin (Eds.), Giving ground: The politics of propinquity (pp. 1–18). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  65. Talen, E., & Ellis, C. (2002). Beyond relativism: Reclaiming the search for good city form. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Taylor, W. M., & Levine, M. P. (2011). Prospects for an ethics of architecture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Tonkiss, F. (2005). Space, the city and social theory: Social relations and urban forms. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  69. Tonkiss, F. (2013). Cities by design: The social life of urban form. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  70. West, G. (2017). Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  71. Yates, J. J. (2017). Saving the soul of the smart city. The Hedgehog Review, 19(2), 18–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey K. H. Chan
    • 1
  1. 1.Singapore University of Technology and DesignSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations