Advertisement

Simulation of Analytical Chemistry Experiments on Augmented Reality Platform

  • Ishan R. Dave
  • Vikas Chaudhary
  • Kishor P. Upla
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 714)

Abstract

The experiments of analytical chemistry are required to perform under controlled conditions. Also, they need a lot of safety precautions. In addition to this, in these experiments, there are many costly chemicals needed which may not be useful after those experiments. Augmented reality is the emerging field for training and education purpose nowadays. In the proposed work, we use augmented reality platform to perform analytical chemistry experiments which can eliminate the risks during experiments and also useful to prevent the waste of chemicals. The proposed algorithm deals with different computer vision techniques such as marker-based augmented reality, adaptive hand segmentation, gesture recognition, and hand pose estimation to manipulate virtual objects and perform experiment virtually. The algorithm is proposed for ego-centric videos to give real experience of experiments to the user and it is implemented on Android smartphone with virtual reality (VR) glasses. Such algorithm can be useful for smart educational environments in future.

Keywords

Augmented reality Chemistry education Marker-less object manipulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate help supported by Dr. J. N. Sarvaiya (Head, ECED, SVNIT) and Mr. Vivek Bhargav (SMIS, Surat). The authors would also like to thank Ms. Therattil Anitta Saju for language amelioration in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Brundage, P., Palassis, J.: School chemistry laboratory safety guide. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sales, M.G.F., Delerue-Matos, C., Martins, I., Serra, I., Silva, M., Morais, S.: A waste management school approach towards sustainability. Resources, conservation and recycling 48(2), 197–207 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 6(4), 355–385 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fjeld, M., Juchli, P., Voegtli, B.M.: Chemistry education: a tangible interaction approach. In: Proc. INTERACT. pp. 287–294 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feiner, S.K.: Augmented reality: A new way of seeing. Scientific American 286(4), 48–55 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang, G., Morreale, P., Medicherla, P.: Applications of augmented reality systems in education. In: Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference. vol. 1, pp. 1380–1385. AACE Chesapeake, VA (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeot, S., Woolard, A.: making it real: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality 10(3-4), 163–174 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, K.: Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends 56(2), 13–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shelton, B.E.: Augmented reality and education: Current projects and the potential for classroom learning. New Horizons for Learning 9(1) (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fjeld, M., Voegtli, B.M.: Augmented chemistry: An interactive educational workbench. In: Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2002. ISMAR 2002. Proceedings. International Symposium on. pp. 259–321. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, Y.C.: A study of comparing the use of augmented reality and physical models in chemistry education. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications. pp. 369–372. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cai, S., Wang, X., Chiang, F.K.: A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior 37, 31– 40 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fiala, M.: ARtag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on. vol. 2, pp. 590–596. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence (6), 679–698 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, T., Hollerer, T.: Handy AR: Markerless inspection of augmented reality objects using fingertip tracking. In: Wearable Computers, 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on. pp. 83–90. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, Z.: A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 22(11), 1330–1334 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu, M.K.: Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE transactions on information theory 8(2), 179–187 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Argyros, A.A., Lourakis, M.I.: Vision-based interpretation of hand gestures for remote control of a computer mouse. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 40–51. Springer (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ishan R. Dave
    • 1
  • Vikas Chaudhary
    • 1
  • Kishor P. Upla
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics EngineeringSardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology (SVNIT)SuratIndia

Personalised recommendations