Advertisement

Social Interfaces in Disaster Situations: Analyzing Rehabilitation and Recovery Processes Among the Fisherfolk of Tamil Nadu After the Tsunami in India

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter highlights the importance of studying social interfaces in the contexts of humanitarian crisis situations such as the Asian tsunami. Humanitarian response and recovery processes are characterized by the interface of different social actors with diverse values, interests, knowledge, and power. During such social encounters, social interfaces are manifested in the form of conflicts or cooperation between those actors affected by the disaster and those actors responsible for humanitarian aid. The chapter also reflects on the processes of continuity and change enforced by diverse outside actors, such as development practitioners and the State, on the day-to-day life events of people affected by disasters. By illustrating the case of fisherfolk in Tamil Nadu, this chapter emphasizes the need to revisit vulnerability reduction from a people-centred perspective. Pointing out that social situations in post-disaster settings are characterized by the interplay between very dynamic local cultures and static formal institutions, further complicated by issues of power, this chapter argues that rehabilitation and recovery programmes can be effective only if there is a restructuring of power, and there are mutually agreed upon norms and understanding between the different actors involved.

References

  1. Berke, P., J. Kartez, and D. Wenger. 1993. Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters 17 (2): 93–109.Google Scholar
  2. Biswas, N. 2007. Blue battle lines. In miles 2 go: Tsunami, rehabilitation, future, ed. M. Martin and S. Sivaraman. New Delhi: Indiadisasters.org.Google Scholar
  3. Chairetakis, A. 1992. Past as present: History and reconstruction after the 1980 earthquake in campania, Southern Italy. Paper presented at the 51st annual meeting of the society for applied anthropology, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
  4. Chaudhry, S. 2007. Two years, still waiting. In miles 2 Go, ed. M. Martin and S. Sivaraman.Google Scholar
  5. Cleaver, F. 2001. Institutional bricolage, conflict and cooperation in usangue, Tanzania. IDS Bulletin 32 (4): 26–35.Google Scholar
  6. Gadgil, Madhav and Ramachandra Guha. 1995. Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary india. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
  8. Jentoft, S. 2000. The community: A missing link in fisheries management. Marine Policy 24 (1): 53–60.Google Scholar
  9. Kurien, J., and T. Achari. 1994. Overfishing and the coastal commons: Causes and consequences. In social ecology, ed. R. Guha. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Long, Norman. 2001. Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, M. and S. Sivaraman (eds.). 2007. miles 2 go: Tsunami, rehabilitation, future. New Delhi: Indiadisasters.org.Google Scholar
  12. Platteau, J-P. 1984. The drive towards mechanisation of small-scale fisheries in kerala: A study of the transformation process of traditional village societies. Development and Change 15 (1): 65–103.Google Scholar
  13. Rubin, C., M. Saperstein, and D. Barbee. 1985. Community recovery from a major natural disaster. Monograph No. 41, Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  14. Salagrama, V. 2001. Coastal area degradation on the east coast of india: Impact on fishworkers. Paper presented at the forging unity: Coastal communities and the indian ocean’s future conference, October 9–13, Chennai, India.Google Scholar
  15. Samal, K.C., and S. Meher. 2003. Fishing communities on chilka lake: Comparative socio-economic study. Economic and Political Weekly 38 (31): 3319–3325.Google Scholar
  16. Santha, D.S. 2007a. State interventions and natural resource management: A study on social interfaces in a riverine fisheries setting in Kerala, India. Natural Resources Forum 31 (1): 61–70.Google Scholar
  17. Santha, D.S. 2007b. Conflicts in fish trade: A study among the riverine fishing communities in Kerala, India. ISA E-Bulletin 8: 22–35.Google Scholar
  18. Sivaraman, S. 2007. Apocalypse Here and Now. In miles 2 go, ed. M. Martin and S. Sivaraman.Google Scholar
  19. Sunil, D.S. 2007. Culture, formal institutions and natural resource management: A study among the riverine fishing communities in Kerala, South India. Doctoral dissertation, Chennai: Indian Institute of Technology, Madras.Google Scholar
  20. Wisner, Ben, Piers Blaikie, Terry Cannon, and Ian Davis. 2004. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Livelihoods and Social Innovation, School of Social WorkTata Institute of Social SciencesMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations