Advertisement

Learning from Nature: Responding to Natural Disaster and the Need for a Multi-faceted Approach in Law

  • V. T. Thamilmaran
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter attempts to discuss the link between the response of individuals and the State in times of natural disasters or calamities. The terrible disaster that struck some of the South and South Asian countries on 26 December 2004 provided ample opportunity for sociologists, and decision makers in matters affecting the public, to learn the behavioural pattern of individuals and the collective response coming in the form of State actions. At the time of the disaster, being a country torn apart by internal armed conflict, Sri Lanka had already suffered enough with a high toll of casualties. However, when the tsunami struck, violent politics was pushed back and humanity came to the forefront to play its real role. Those who watched the response from individuals, which cut across all barriers including the surrounding violent atmosphere, and compared it with the measures taken by the State in putting the relief machinery in motion, have tended to conclude that collective response is always constrained by extraneous elements. These elements are not ‘pure’ in their contribution towards alleviating the distress and suffering of the people at the time when it is relevant. The law, although considered to be collective wisdom and social response to human needs, sometimes fails to take into consideration the negative impacts of such extraneous elements which are inherent in all law-making endeavours. The raw human sentiments which flowed through the channel of humanity did not care for anything other than the cries in need coming from fellow human beings. It is proved that ‘collective wisdom’ cannot match the pace at which humanity flows, in the form of individual responses in cases of natural disaster; it is pure and natural in all its logic. In this sense, a question is raised as to whether there is any legitimacy in demanding obedience to the ‘collective wisdom’ which may actually play a negative role in the response to natural disasters.

References

  1. Balasingham, Anton. 2005. Pirapaharan’s top Priority is Reconstruction, not Politics. Tamilnet, 28 Jan 2005. http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=14100. Accessed 01 Feb 2012.
  2. Burke, Adam, Anthea, Mulakala. 2005. Dnors and peace building, vol. 2, p. 27.Google Scholar
  3. Elliott, Mark. 2001. The constiutional foundations of judicial review. Hart Publishing, p. 44Google Scholar
  4. Glasius, Marlies. 2005. The European union and Sri Lanka: Tsunami response and long term policy. Centre for Global Government , London School of Economics and Political Science. Accessed 01 Feb 2012.Google Scholar
  5. Frerks, Georg. 2006. The Politics of Post-Tsunami Reconstruction in War-torn Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka: Centre for Just Peace and Democracy.Google Scholar
  6. Jayatilleka, Dayan. 2005. Every P-TOM, Dick and Harry. The Sunday Island, 10 July 2005. http://www.island.lk/2005/07/10/features1.html.
  7. Jeffels, Lyndon. 2005. ‘Six months on: Facing Fears.’ Forced Migration Review 36–37 (Special Issue. Tsunami: Learning from Humanitarian Responses). http://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/tsunami.pdf. Accessed 01 Feb 2012.
  8. Keith, Noyhr. 2005. Tsunami’s Wall of Destruction Should Heal Lanka’s Divisions. Daily Mirror, 01 Jan 2005. http://www.dailymirror.lk/2005/01/01/opinion/1.asp.
  9. Omar, Imtiaz. 1996. Rights, emergency and judicial review. Martinus Nijhoff, p. 154.Google Scholar
  10. Pararajasingham, Ana. 2006. The failure of joint mechanism - causes-consequences and conclusions. Centre for Just Peace and Democracy, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  11. Peiris, Harim. 2005. Tamilnet. 26 Jan 2005, http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=14084. Accessed 01 Feb 2012.
  12. Pinto Jayawardena, Kishali. 2012. Pistol Whipping Justice in Sri Lanka and the Truth about Helping Hambantota. 21 Oct 2012. www.colombotelegrph.com/2012. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.
  13. Ravi, Faiia. 2005. From disaster to opportunity: Tsunami relief as a study in the devolution of power. In Challenges of linking post-tsunami reconstruction with peace building. Centre for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar
  14. Somasunderam, Daya. 2007. Collective Trauma in Northern Sri Lanka: A Qualitative Psychosocial-Ecological Study. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 20017 (1): 5. http://www.ijmhs.com/content/1/1/5. Accessed 01 Feb 2012.
  15. Uyangoda, Jayadeva. 2006. Ethnic conflict, the state and tsunami disaster in Sri Lanka in 06 Inter-Asia cultural studies, p. 341.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of ColomboColomboSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations