Advertisement

An Ethno-political Accounting of the Sri Lankan Tsunami Impact and Recovery

  • Randall Kuhn
Chapter

Abstract

New tools aimed at achieving accountability in the delivery of humanitarian assistance offer opportunities to understand the role foreign donors play in the domestic ethno-political landscapes of post-disaster nations. In Sri Lanka, hopes that the Indian Ocean Tsunami would facilitate further rapprochement between the Sinhalese-dominated government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were soon replaced by renewed conflict. Soon after, came widening gaps in the levels of foreign assistance reaching the disproportionately-affected Tamil and Muslim minority communities in the east and north of the island. This paper combines data from the UNDP Development Assistance Database with highly local damage and ethnic composition, to provide an in-depth accounting of the magnitude of post-Tsunami foreign assistance, the role of foreign donors in distributional inequities, and the tragic consequences of the disaster-conflict nexus. While the power bases of both the ruling United National Party and the LTTE received nearly twice the national average level of foreign assistance, the war- and tsunami-ravaged regions of the Eastern Province received as little as half the national average.

Keywords

Tsunami Sri lanka Foreign assistance Aid bias Ethnic conflict 

Abbreviations

LTTE

Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam

CFA

Cease Fire Agreement

DAD

Development Assistance Database

DAP

Dollars per Affected Population

GoSL

Government of Sri Lanka

References

  1. Anderson, M.B. 1999. Do No Harm: How Aid Can Support Peace—Or War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  2. Asian Development Bank. 2005. Sri Lanka 2005 Post-Tsunami Recovery Program, Preliminary Damage, and Needs Assessment. Asian Development Bank, Japan Bank for International Cooperation, and World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, Michael. 2005. Humanitarianism Transformed. Perspectives on Politics 3 (4): 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benini, Aldo, Charles Conley, Brody Dittemore, and Zachary Waksman. 2008. Survivor Needs or Logistical Convenience? Factors Shaping Decisions to Deliver Relief to Earthquake-Affected Communities, Pakistan 2005–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brun, Cathrine. 2003. Local Citizens or Internally Displaced Persons? Dilemmas of Long Term Displacement in Sri Lanka. Journal of Refugee Studies 16 (4): 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan-Smith, M., and S. Maxwell. 1994. Linking Relief and Development: An Introduction and Overview. IDS Bulletin 25 (4): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cliffe, Lionel, and Robin Luckham. 2000. What Happens to the State in Conflict? Political Analysis as a Tool for Planning Humanitarian Assistance. Disasters 24 (4): 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drury, A. Cooper, Richard Stuart Olson, & Douglas A. Van Belle. 2005. The Politics of Humanitarian Aid: U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance, 1964–1995. Journal of Politics 67 (2): 454–73.Google Scholar
  9. Easterly, William. 2002. The Cartel of Good Intentions. Foreign Policy 131: 40–49.Google Scholar
  10. Fengler, Wolfgang, Ahya Ihasn, and Kai Kaiser. 2008. Managing Post-Disaster Reconstruction Finance: International Experience in Public Financial Management. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4475.Google Scholar
  11. Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Flint, M., and H. Goyder. 2006. Funding the Tsunami Response. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, Fiona. 2001. New Humanitarianism: Does it Provide a Moral Banner for the 21st Century? Disasters 25 (4): 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, Paul. 2004. Allocation of Post-Disaster Reconstruction Financing to Housing. Building Research and Information 32 (5): 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasper, Desmond R. 1999. Drawing a Line: Ethical and Political Strategies in Complex Emergency Assistance. European Journal of Development Research 11 (2): 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goyder, Hugh, Cowan Coventry, Jerry Adams, Tania Kaiser, Suzanne Williams, and Ian Smillie. 2006. Linking Relief, Recovery, and Development (LRRD)—Policy Study. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.Google Scholar
  17. Grewal, Mandeep Kaur. 2006. Approaches to Equity in Post-Tsunami Assistance, Sri Lanka: A Case Study. Report Commissioned by the Office of the UN Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery (OSE).Google Scholar
  18. Hasbullah, S.H. 2001. Muslim Refugees: The Forgotten People in Sri Lanka’s Ethnic Conflict. Nuraicholai: Research and Action Forum for Social Development.Google Scholar
  19. Hilhorst, Dorothea. 2002. Being Good at Doing Good? Quality and Accountability of Humanitarian NGOs. Disasters 26 (3): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houghton, Rachel. 2007. The Tsunami Evaluation Coalition: Implications for Practice. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.Google Scholar
  21. Hyndman, Jennifer. 2007. The Securitization of Fear in Post-Tsunami Sri Lanka. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97 (2): 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Indo-Asian News Service (IANS). 2007. Tamils Left Out in Lanka’s Tsunami Rehab Plans. Indo-Asian News Service, 26 Dec 2007.Google Scholar
  23. International Crisis Group. 2008. Sri Lanka’s Return to War: Limiting the Damage. Asia Report No. 146. Brussels/Colombo: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn, Randall. 2008. Tsunami and Conflict in Sri Lanka (Unpublished manuscript, 2008).Google Scholar
  25. Le Billon, Philippe. 2000. The Political Economy of War: What Relief Agencies Need to Know. Overseas Development Institute: London.Google Scholar
  26. Le Billon, Philippe, and Arno Waizenegger. 2007. Peace in the Wake of Disaster? Secessionist Conflicts and the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (3): 411–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Macrae, Joanna, Mark Bradbury, Susanne Jaspars, Douglas Johnson, and Mark Duffield. 1997. Conflict, the Continuum and Chronic Emergencies: A Critical Analysis of the Scope for Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development Planning in Sudan. Disasters 21 (3): 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morris, S.S., and Q. Wodon. 2003. The Allocation of Natural Disaster Relief Funds: Hurricane Mitch in Honduras. World Development 31 (7): 1279–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ofstad, Arve. 2002. Countries in Violent Conflict and Aid Strategies: The Case of Sri Lanka. World Development 30 (2): 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olsen, Gorm Rye, Nils Carstensen, and Kristian Høyen. 2003. Humanitarian Crises: What Determines the Level of Emergency Assistance? Media Coverage, Donor Interests and the Aid Business. Disasters 27 (2): 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Slim, Hugo. 1997. Doing the Right Thing: Relief Agencies, Moral Dilemmas and Moral Responsibility in Political Emergencies and War. Disasters 21 (3): 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smillie, I. 2001. From Patrons to Partners? In Patronage or Partnership: Local Capacity Building in Humanitarian Crises, ed. I. Smillie, 175–193. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  33. Smillie, I., and L. Minear. 2003. The Quality of Money: Donor Behavior in Humanitarian Financing: An Independent Study. Somerville, MA: Tufts University.Google Scholar
  34. SPHERE Project. 2004. Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response, 2004 edition. http://www.sphereproject.org/handbook/pages/navbook.htm?param1=0.
  35. Sri Lanka Department of Census and Statistics (DCS). 2001. Census of Population and Housing. Colombo, Sri Lanka: DCS.Google Scholar
  36. Sri Lanka Department of Census and Statistics (DCS). 2005. Statistics of the Census of Buildings and Persons Affected by the Tsunami—2004. Colombo, Sri Lanka: DCS.Google Scholar
  37. Sri Lanka National Disaster Management Centre (NDMC). 2005. Tsunami Impact Data. Colombo, Sri Lanka: NDMC.Google Scholar
  38. Telford, John, and John Cosgrave. 2007. The International Humanitarian System and the 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunamis. Disasters 31 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tong, Jacqui. 2004. Questionable Accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003. Disasters 28 (2): 176–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2008. Development Assistance Database. Bangkok: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
  41. Uvin, Peter. 1998. Aiding Violence: The Development Enterprise in Rwanda. West Hartford, Connecticut: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  42. Waters, T. 2001. Bureaucratizing the Good Samaritan: The Limitations to Humanitarian Relief Operations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  43. Weiss, Thomas G. 1999. Principles, Politics and Humanitarian Action. Ethics and International Affairs 13: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White, Philip, and Lionel Cliffe. 2000. Matching Response to Context in Complex Political Emergencies: “Relief”, “Development”, “Peace-Building” or Something In-Between?CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilkinson, Ray. 2003. The Road to Recovery: Sri Lanka Emerging from the Ruins. Refugees 1 (130): 4–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCLA Fielding School of Public Health and California Center for Population ResearchLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations