New Andamans: The Aftermath of Tsunami in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands

  • Sunita ReddyEmail author


Lieutenant Governor (LG) Ramachandra Ganesh Kapse made a commitment to rebuild the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar into ‘New Andamans’ after the 2004 tsunami. He declared that INR 30 billion would be required for reconstructing and modernizing infrastructure in the islands, focusing on tourism, fisheries, and high value agriculture in the process of rehabilitation. This chapter analyzes the development plans post-tsunami, focusing on the long-term rehabilitation, livelihoods, and shelters, by the Andaman and Nicobar Administration. The top-down rehabilitation packages were not suitable to the needs and choices of the people and were thrust upon them. By providing free ration nearly for five years until they were shifted to permanent houses, there was a disjunction in establishing food security and livelihood to the people. Even though they got the ‘tsunami’ houses, although of poor quality, livelihoods of majority remained an unresolved question. The tsunami unearthed many core issues: legal-illegal status of people, encroachment of forestlands, and the whole debate on the ‘development’ plans of the islands. The chapter examines the gap between the bureaucratic norm and the emergent norm: the assessment of the officials about the success of the rehabilitation process and the fulfilment of expectations and needs of the people. The gap between the bureaucratic norm and the emergent norm was far and wide.


  1. Abid, M. 2006. Relief and Rehabilitation. Role of Civil Society Organizations. Report submitted to the Andaman and Nicobar Administration.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, R., and H. Andrews. n.d. Casefile: Andamans Report. In Development and Ethnocide: Colonial practices in the Andaman Islands, ed. S. Venkateswar. Denmark: IWGIA (2004).Google Scholar
  3. Bharati, Chaturvedi. 2005. Twinning may cost the Andamans dear. HT Nations New Delhi, 25 July 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Coyne, C. 2013. Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Curray, J. R. 2005. Tectonics and History of the Andaman Sea region. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 25 (1): 187–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson, Colin H., Cassidy Johnson, Gonzalo Lizarralde, Nese Dikmen, and Alicia Sliwinski. 2007. Truths and Myths About Community Participation in Post-disaster Housing Projects. Habitat International 31 (1): 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhingra, K. 2005. The Andaman and Nicobar Islands in the 20th Century a Gazetteer. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gautam, R.K. 2005. The Primitive Tribes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Primitive Tribes in contemporary India: Concept, Ethnography and Demography 1: 35–73.Google Scholar
  9. Guha, R., and M. Gadgil. 1989. State Forestry and Social Conflicts in British India: A Study in Ecological Bases in Agrarian Protest. Past and Present 123: 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gunewardena, Nandini, and Mark Schuller (eds.). 2008. Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neolibral Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction. New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hyndman, J., and Hyndman, J. 2011. Dual Disasters: Humanitarian Aid After the 2004 Tsunami. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  12. Klein. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Capital & Class 33: 172–173.Google Scholar
  13. Majumdar, R.C. 1975. Penal Settlement in Andaman. In Gazetteers Unit, Dept. of Culture, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. New Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nair, C.T.S. 1989. Environmental Issues in Forest Land Use in the Andaman Islands. In Andaman, Nicobar and Lakhsadweep: An Environmental Impact Assessment, ed. C.J. Saldanha, 94–111. New Delhi: Oxford Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. NDMA. 2007. Accessed on 20 May 2018.
  16. Oliver-Smith, A. 1996. Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology 25 (1): 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramachandran, R. 2000. A People in Peril: High Levels of Hepatitis B Infection Among Sections of the Already Minuscule Tribal Population of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Raise Medical and Social Concerns. Frontline 17 (16).Google Scholar
  18. Ramakrishna, Raghunathan, C. and Sivaperuman, C. 2010. Recent Trends in Biodiversity of Andaman and Nicobar Islands: 1–542 (Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata).Google Scholar
  19. Reddy, Sunita. 2007. Mega Tourism in Andaman and Nicobar Islands: Some Concerns. Journal of Human Ecology 21 (3): 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider, Saundra K. 1992. Governmental Response to Disasters: The Conflict Between Bureaucratic Procedures and Emergent Norms. Public Administration Review 52 (2): 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sekhsaria, P. 2002. Logging Off, for Now. Frontline 19. Available at: Accessed on 28 Feb 2011.
  22. Singh, Simron J. 2007. The Political Economy of Aid. A Comment on Post-tsunami Nicobars. Light of Andamans 32 (9–10).Google Scholar
  23. Sircar, Pronob K. 2004. The Primitive Tribes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. New Delhi: Akansha Publishing House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health and Adjunct Faculty at the Special Centre for Disaster ResearchJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations