The Role of Policy Research Institutes in Policymaking in Indonesia

  • Farini Pane
  • Irene Astuti Kuntjoro
  • Siti Ruhanawati
  • Tanty Nurhayati Djafar
  • Kharisma Priyo Nugroho


As organisations largely independent from government, policy research institutes and think-tanks have an important role to play in bringing new issues and alternative viewpoints to the attention of policymakers and the public. In so doing, they help to improve the quality of policymaking, enrich democratic contestation of ideas and promote government accountability for policy decisions. This chapter examines the emergence, evolution and role of think-tanks in policymaking in the context of Indonesia’s transition to democracy. Drawing on the experiences of 16 Indonesian policy research institutes, this chapter discusses how each of the issues mentioned above shaped the journey of co-existence between policy research institutes and policymaking in Indonesia. It explores how and under what circumstances Indonesian policy research institutes are able to influence policy and being influenced by policy and how they cope with the dynamics of policymaking regimes in Indonesia.


Evidence-informed policymaking Knowledge sector Think-tank Policy research institute Policy research organisation Knowledge production Indonesia 


  1. Antlöv, H., Ibrahim, R., & Van Tuijil, P. (2006). NGO governance and accountability in Indonesia: Challenges in a newly democratizing country (Resource Document). The International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. Accessed 7 Mar 2017.
  2. Antlöv, H., Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Rapp, E. (2010). Civil society capacity building for democratic reform: Experience and lessons from Indonesia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(3), 417−439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach, T., Niklasson, B., & Painter, M. (2012). The role of agencies in policy-making. Journal of Policy and Society, 31(3), 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beittinger-Lee, V. (2009). (Un)Civil society and political change in Indonesia: A contested arena. Routledge: Studies on Civil Society in Asia.Google Scholar
  5. Carden, F. (2009). Knowledge to policy: Making the most of development research. Thousand Oaks/Ottowa: Sage/International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  6. Cislowski, H., & Purwadi, A. (2011). Study of the role of Indonesian government research units (‘balitbang’) in bridging research and development policy (Resource Document). Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  7. Datta, A., Jones, H., Febriany, V., Harris, D., Dewi, R. K., Wild, L., & Young, J. (2011). The political economy of policy-making in Indonesia: Opportunities for improving the demand and use of knowledge (Resource Document). Overseas Development Institute. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  8. ELSAM. (2016). Mengembangkan prinsip-prinsip HAM di Kabupaten Sikka. Accessed 12 Mar 2017.
  9. Ganie-Rochman, M. (2002). An uphill struggle: Advocacy NGOs under Soeharto’s new order. Pustaka Pelajar: LabSosio.Google Scholar
  10. Gordon, J. (1998). NGOs, the environment and political pluralism in new order Indonesia. Journal of the Southeast Asian Studies Student Association, 2(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  11. Goss, A. (2011). The floracrats: State-sponsored science and the failure of the enlightenment in Indonesia. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hadiz, V. R., & Dhakidae, D. (2005). Social science and power in Indonesia. Equinox: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Hallsworth, M., Parker, S., & Rutter, J. (2011). Policymaking in the real world: Evidence and analysis (Resource Document). Institute for Government. Accessed 10 March 2017.
  14. Hunt, J., & Shackley, S. (2009). Reconceiving science and policy: Academic, fiducial, and bureaucratic knowledge. Minerva, 37(2), 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lassa, J. A., Davis, B., Nugroho, K., & Li, D. E. (2017). Serendipity of think tanks networks and influence in Indonesia. Manuscript Unpublished.Google Scholar
  16. McGann, J. G. (2005). Think tanks and policy advice in the United States: Academics, advisors, and advocates. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Nugroho, K., Carden, F., & Antlöv, H. (2017, forthcoming). Local knowledge matters: Power, context and policymaking in Indonesia.Google Scholar
  18. Ofir, Z., Schwandt, T., Duggan, C., & McLean, R. (2016). Research quality plus. A holistic approach to evaluating research (Resource Document). International Developer Research Center. Accesses 5 Mar 2017.
  19. Pellini, A., Djafar, T. N., & Suriastini, N. W. (2017). Is measuring policy influence like measuring thin air? The experience of SurveyMETER in producing three episode studies of research-based policy influence (Working Paper 18). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. Accessed 25 Mar 2017.
  20. Pisani, E., Kok, M. O., & Nugroho, K. (2016). Indonesia’s road to universal health coverage: A political journey. Health Policy and Planning, 32(2), 267–276. Scholar
  21. Rakhmani, I., & Siregar, F. (2016). Reforming research in Indonesia: Policies and practice (Resource Document). Global Development Network. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
  22. Rakhmani, I., Ruhanawati, S., Darmadi, D., & Pellini, A. (2017, forthcoming). Religious studies as evidence for policy: Insights from the Centre for the Study of Islam and Society in Indonesia (Working Paper). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative.Google Scholar
  23. Rose, J. (2017). Brexit, trump, and post-truth politics. Public Integrity, 19, 1–4. Scholar
  24. Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14, 271–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scanlon, M. M., & Alawiyah, T. (2015). The NGO sector in Indonesia: Context, concepts and an updated profile (Resource Document). Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.$1$11C1$.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2017.
  26. STATT. (2012). NGO sector review finding report (Resource Document). Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  27. Stone, D., Maxwell, S., & Keating, M. (2001). Bridging research and policy (Resource Document). Warwick University. Accessed 18 Mar 2017.
  28. Sumarto, S. (2011). The SMERU research institute: History and lessons learned. Report to Australia-Indonesia Partnership on Revitalising Indonesia’s Knowledge Sector for Development. Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative.Google Scholar
  29. Suriastini, N. W., Pellini, A., Sikoki, B., Fauzan, J., & Rahayu, T. (2016a). Building partnerships for designing policy: Episode study of Jakarta declaration on dementia- and Age-Friendly City (Working Paper). Yogyakarta: SurveyMETER.Google Scholar
  30. Suriastini, N. W., Pellini, A., Sikoki, B., Fauzan, J., Pujiastuti, S., & Sukamtiningsih (2016b). Data that inspires policy: Episode study of City of Balikpapan’s experience towards age-Friendly City 2030 (Working Paper). Yogyakarta: SurveyMETER.Google Scholar
  31. Suriastini, N. W., Pellini, A., Sikoki, B., Fauzan, J., Dwiyanti, D. H., & Lestari, S. (2016c). Information strengthens policy: Episode study of the commitment of Denpasar City in integrating policies of Child-Friendly City, Age-Friendly City, and Green Open Spaces of Healthy City (Working Paper). Yogyakarta: SurveyMETER.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farini Pane
    • 1
  • Irene Astuti Kuntjoro
    • 1
  • Siti Ruhanawati
    • 1
  • Tanty Nurhayati Djafar
    • 2
  • Kharisma Priyo Nugroho
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Indonesian Alliance for Policy Research (ARK Indonesia)JakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy: The Knowledge Sector InitiativeJakartaIndonesia
  3. 3.Winrock InternationalBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations