• Dominik Mierzejewski
  • Bartosz Kowalski
Part of the Global Political Transitions book series (GLPOTR)


This chapter builds the bridge between power transition theory and the “three in one” understanding of China’s international identities. By defining and redefining China’s identity, state, ideology, and culture have created a special set of social relationships between themselves and international society as a whole. The state identity shaped and exercised by territorial conflicts, the creation of institutions, and the definition of national interests allows China to be equal among nations. The second pillar of Chinese international identity―the narrative on justice and equality and materialism―has allowed China to gain support from the developing world. The third discussed identity is related to the country’s own cultural heritage. This traditional approach allows China to win the hearts and minds of people in the West. Through the above discussed approach, Chinese governments have secured China’s relatively peaceful transition to global power status.


China Power transition theory Constructivism Types of identity State Ideology Culture 


  1. Dai Rong (2013) Kongzi xueyuan yu Zhongguo yuyan wenhua waijiao (The Confucius Institute: Chinese language and cultural diplomacy), (Shanghai: Shehui kexueyuan).Google Scholar
  2. Hanban (2017) About Confucius Institute/Classroom, online: (accessed 12.04.2018).
  3. Kowalski, B. (2017) ‘China’s foreign policy towards Central and Eastern Europe: The “16+1” format in the South–South cooperation perspective. Cases of the Czech Republic and Hungary’, Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, No. 1.Google Scholar
  4. Lai Ha-Chan (2017) ‘Soft balancing against the US ‘pivot to Asia’: China’s geostrategic rationale for establishing the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 71, Issue 6.Google Scholar
  5. Pape R. A. (2005) ‘Soft Balancing Against the United States’, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1.Google Scholar
  6. Russet B. (1967) International Regions and the International System (Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company).Google Scholar
  7. Taylor Fravel M. (2005) ‘Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes’, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 2.Google Scholar
  8. Xi Jinping (2015) Xi Jinping jiti huijian chuxi disici Zhongguo – Zhong Dong Ou guojia lingdao ren huiwu de Zhong Dong Ou guojialingdao ren (Meeting between Xi Jinping the leaders of Central and Eastern European Countries during the 4th Summit China – CEE), online: (accessed 14.03.2017).
  9. Yang Lijin (2013) ‘The Clash of Nationalism between China and Japan’, EAI Background Brief, No. 829, online: (accessed 13.11.2017).

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominik Mierzejewski
    • 1
  • Bartosz Kowalski
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Int’l & Political StudiesUniversity of Łódź Faculty of Int’l & Political StudiesŁódźPoland

Personalised recommendations