Advertisement

Introduction: Theoretical Understanding of China’s Selective Identities

  • Dominik Mierzejewski
  • Bartosz Kowalski
Chapter
Part of the Global Political Transitions book series (GLPOTR)

Abstract

From the perspective of this work, the key question of how far China, as a rising power, is different from the West is one of the most critical issues in the analysis. The other fundamental questions discussed here are: How does China place the United States within the format of selective identities, and what are its primary reasons for grouping political entities with different types of identity, for what reasons, and how was this achieved? And finally, how does China build its position within the power transition theory and selected identity nexus? The chapter discusses the essential parts of the presenting model: equality as the precondition of building different, chosen identities by China in international politics, the problem of identity and its relations to different types of political actors, and finally the issue of influence, which is understood as the part of comprehensive national power that will guarantee the relatively peaceful rise of China.

Keywords

China Power transition theory Constructivism Identity State Ideology Culture 

References

  1. Bennett G. (1976) Yundong: Mass Campaigns in Chinese Communist Leadership (Berkeley: Center for Chinese Studies China Research Monographs).Google Scholar
  2. Buzan B. (1983) ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School’, International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 3.Google Scholar
  3. Carver, Charles S. (2009) ‘Cognitive Interference and the Structure of Behavior’ in Irwin G. Sarason, Greogory R. Pierce, Barbara R. Sarason (eds.) Cognitive Interference: Theories, Methods, and Findings (New York and London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  4. Cerulo K. (1996) ‘Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 23.Google Scholar
  5. Clark I. (2011) ‘China and the United States a Succession of Hegemonies?’, International Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 1.Google Scholar
  6. Clausen S. (1998) ‘Party Policy and National Culture Towards a State-directed cultural nationalism in China?’, in: Kjeld Erik Brodsgaard and David Strand (eds.) Reconstructing Twentieth-Century China, State control, civil society, and national identity (Clarendon: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Dai Xiaodong (2006) ‘Minzu rentong yu quanqiuhua (National identity and globalization)’ in He Peiqun and Yu Shuxuan (eds.) Guoji guanxi yu rentong zhengzhi (International Politics and Politics of Identity), (Beijing: Shishi Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  8. Dong Qingling (2008) ‘Xianshi jiangou zhuyi yu ziyou jiangou zhuyi yi zhongyanjiu gangling neibu de fenhua’ (Realistic Constructivism and Liberal Constructivism: Differentiation of the Research Program), Shije Jingji yu Zhengzhi, Vol. 12.Google Scholar
  9. Dong Qingling (2010) ‘Zai chongtu yu hezuo zhijian: zuowei yuan lilun huo lilunqiao de jiangou zhuyi (Between Conflict and Cooperation: Constructivism as a Meta Theory or Theoretical Bridge)’ in Guoji guanxi yanjiu: tansuo yu chuangxin: 2009 nian boshi luntan (International Relations Research: Exploration and Innovation: 2009 Doctoral Forum) (Beijing: Shijie Zhishi Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  10. Dickinson E. (1920) The Equality of the States in International Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dye T. R., Zeigler H. (1988) ‘Socialism and Equality in Cross-National Perspective’, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 21, No. 1.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenstadt S, Giesen B. (1995) ‘The construction of collective identity’, European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie/Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie, Vol. 36, No. 1.Google Scholar
  13. Fairbank J. K. (1966) ‘The People’s Middle Kingdom’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 44, No. 4.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman J. R., Goldstein J. S. (1991) ‘U.S.-Soviet-Chinese Relations: Routine, Reciprocity, or Rational Expectations’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 85.Google Scholar
  15. Gao, Ruiquan (2010) ‘The Source of the Idea of Equality in Confucian Thought’, Frontiers of Philosophy in China, Vol. 5, No. 4.Google Scholar
  16. Gilpin R. (1981) War, and Change in World politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guzzini S., Leander A. (eds.) (2006), Constructivism and International Relations, Alexander Wendt and his Critics (New York: Routlegde).Google Scholar
  18. Guzzini S. (2012) ‘The Ambivalent ‘Diffussion of power’ in Global Governance’, in: Guzzini S., Neumann Iver B. (eds.) The Diffusion of Power in Global Governance. International Political Economy meets Foucault (London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardy C., Lawrance T. (2005) ‘Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity’, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 1.Google Scholar
  20. Hicks F. Ch. (1908) ‘The Equality of States and the Hague Conferences’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 2, No. 3.Google Scholar
  21. Higgins R. (2012) ‘Equality of States and Immunity from Suit: A Complex Relationship’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 43.Google Scholar
  22. Hjorth R. (2011) ‘Equality in the theory of international society: Kelsen, Rawls and the English School’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 37.Google Scholar
  23. Holland D., Lachicotte W., Skinner D., Cain C. (1998) Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds (Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  24. Hopf T. (2002), Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  25. Hu Jintao (2005) Build Towards a Harmonious World of Lasting Peace and Common Prosperity, New York, September 15, 2005, online: http://www.un.org/webcast/summit2005/statements15/china050915eng.pdf (accessed 12.03.2017).
  26. Keohane R. O. (1986) ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization, Vol. 40, No. 1.Google Scholar
  27. Keohane R., Nye J.S. (1987) ‘Power and Interdependence’, International Organization, Vol. 41, No. 4.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, Samuel S. (ed.) (1984) China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).Google Scholar
  29. Lasswell H. (1972) Politics: Who Gets What, When, How (New York: Meridian Books).Google Scholar
  30. Levinger G. (1959) ‘The Development of Perceptions and Behavior in Newly Formed Social Power Relationship’, in: Dorwin Cartwright (ed.) Studies in Social Power (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan).Google Scholar
  31. Liu Ming (2007) Dangdai Zhongguo guoji xingxiang dingwei yu zhuangbo (The transmission of China’s image and position) (Beijing: Waijiao Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  32. Men Honghua (2007) ‘Yali, Renshi yu guoji xingxiang – guanyu Zhongguo canjia yu guoji zhidu zhanlve de lishi jieyi’ (Pressure, Cognition and International Image – A Historical Interpretation of China’s Strategy of Participation in International System), in: Wang Jisi and Niu Jun (eds.) Zhongguo xuezhe kan shijie (Chinese Scholars See the world), (Beijing: Xin Shijie Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  33. Mellucci A. (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mierzejewski D. (2013) ‘From Morality to Morality: The Rhetoric of Chinese Foreign Policy Over Four Decades’, in: Bin Wu, Shujie Yao, Jian Chen (eds.) China’s Development and Harmonization. Towards a Balance with Nature, Society and the International Community (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  35. Oppenheim L. (1905) International Law, a Treatise (New York, Bombay: Longman Greens Co.).Google Scholar
  36. Organski A. F. K., Kugler J. (1980/2015) The War Ledger (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  37. Palan R. (2000) ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 26, No. 4.Google Scholar
  38. Pan Wei (2010) ‘Shehui kexin jianzhiguan tixi yu xin kexin jiazhiguan gongshi’ (The System of Main Social Values and the New Consensus of Main Values), in: Pan Wei, Ma Ya (eds.) Jujiao dangdai Zhongguo jiazhiguan (Focus on System of Values of Contemporary China), (Shanghai: Sanlian shudian).Google Scholar
  39. Philips, Hardy. (2002) Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction, (Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qin Yaqing. (2001) ‘Response to Yong Deng: Power, Perception and the Cultural Lens,’ Asian Affairs, Vol. 28, No. 3.Google Scholar
  41. Qin Yaqing (2009) Guoji tixi yu Zhongguo wajiao (International System and Chinese Diplomacy), (Beijing: Shijie Zhishi Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  42. Qin Yaqing (2010) ‘Guojia shenfen, zhanlve wenhua he anquan liyi – guanyu Zhongguo yu guoji shehui guanxi de san ge jiashe (National Identity, Strategic Culture and Security Interests – Three Assumptions about the Relationship between China and the International Society)’ in Qin Yaqing (ed.) Quanli, zhidu, wenhua: guoji guanxi lilun yu fangfa yanjiu wenti (Power, Institutions and Culture: Collected Works on International Relations Theory and Methodology), (Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  43. Qin Yaqing, Wei Ling (2008) ‘Structure, Processes, and the Socialization of Power: East Asia Community-building and the Rise of China’, in: Robert S. Ross and Zhu Feng (eds.) China’s Ascent Power, Security, and the Future of International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  44. Rae D. (1981) Equalities (Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  45. Ruggie J. G. (1983) ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, World Politics, Vol. 35.Google Scholar
  46. Ruggie J. G. (1998) ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4.Google Scholar
  47. Shambaugh D. (2013) China Goes Global: The Partial Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  48. Shang Huipeng (2009) ‘Lun renyu fuguo. Cong jibenren jizhuang tai de jiao jidu Zhongguo de guoji xingshi’ (Human and Auxiliary State. Interpretation of China’s International Posture from Human and Situation Perspective) in: Wang Jisi (ed.) Zhongguo xuezhe kan shijie (Chinese Scholars see the World) (Shanghai: Renmin Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  49. Shih Chih-yu (1988) ‘National Role Conception as Foreign Policy Motivation: The Psychocultural Bases of Chinese Diplomacy’, Political Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 4.Google Scholar
  50. Stenseth L. (1998) Nationalism and Foreign Policy: The Case of China’s Nansha Rhetoric, M.A.Thesis, (Oslo: University of Oslo).Google Scholar
  51. Straub J. (2002) ‘Personal and Collective Identity: A Conceptual Analysis’, in: Heidrun Friese (ed.) Identities: Time, Difference, and Boundaries (New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books).Google Scholar
  52. Su Changhe (2010) ‘Zhongguo yinggai ruhe shengchan ziji de yuyan quanli (How should China produce its right to speak)’, Nanfang Chuang (South Reviews), Vol. 8.Google Scholar
  53. Sun Jisheng (2007) ‘Yuyan, shenfen yuguoji zhixu: houjiangouzhuyi lilun yanjiu’ (Language, identity, and international order: the research of post-constructivist theory), in: Zhao Jinjun, Gao Fei (eds) Waijiao xueyuan 2007 nian kexue zhoulun wenji (The collection of papers of the Diplomatic Institute 2007), (Beijing: Shijie Zhishi Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  54. Temkin L. S. (1993) Inequality (Oxford Ethics Series), (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  55. Van Ness P. (1970) Revolution and Chinese Foreign Policy (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  56. Watson A. (1987) ‘Hedley Bull, states systems and international societies’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2.Google Scholar
  57. Wendt A. (1999) ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 2.Google Scholar
  58. Wolfe D. (1959) ‘Power and Authority in the Family’, in: Dorwin Cartwright (ed.) Studies in Social Power (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan).Google Scholar
  59. Xi Jinping (2013) Promote Friendship Between Our People and Work Together to Build a Bright Future, online: http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/zyjh_665391/t1078088.shtml (accessed 12.03.2017).
  60. Xu Zhouyun (2010) Wozhe yu tazhe: Zhongguo lishishang de nei wai fenji (I and the Other: The Distinction Between Internal and External in Chinese History), (Shanghai: Shibao Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  61. Yan Xuetong (2014) ‘Daoyi xianshi zhuyi de guoji guangxi lilun’ (Moral realism theory of international relations), Guoji Wenti Yanjiu, Vol. 5, online: http://www.ciis.org.cn/gyzz/2014–10/15/content_7296665.htm (accessed 12.04.2017).
  62. Yu Xintian (2010) Wenhua, Ruanshi li yu Zhongguo waijiao zhanlve (Culture, Soft-Power and the Chinese Diplomatic Strategy), (Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  63. Zehfuss M. (2001) ‘Constructivism in International Relations: Wendt, Onuf and Kratochwil’, in: Karin M. Fierke and Knud Erik Jorgensen (eds.) Constructing International Relations: the Next Generation (New York: M.E. Sharp).Google Scholar
  64. Zhang Quanyi (2010) Shijie guojia shengcheng jili chutan: Quanqiu jiti rentong de shengchengyu moshi zhuanhuan yanjiu (A Preliminary Study on the Mechanism of Countries Formation in the World: A Study on the Formation and Patterns of Transformation of Global Collective Identity), (Beijing: Guangming Ribao Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  65. Zhang Yongjin (1991) ‘China’s Entry into International Society: Beyond the Standard of ‘Civilization’’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1.Google Scholar
  66. Zhou Pinyun (2006) ‘Dangdai Zhongguo waijiao de guoji diwei: yingxiang yinsuji dong tai fenxi (The International Position of China’s Diplomacy: the Analysis of Influential Factor and Rnvironment)’, in: He Peiqun and Yu Shuxuan (eds.) Guoji Guanxi yu Rentong Zhengzhi (International Politics and Politics of Identity), (Beijing: Shishi Chubanshe).Google Scholar
  67. Zhou Zunnan (1988) ‘Woguo duiwai zhengce tiaozheng de lilun jichi – xuexi Deng Xiaoping tongzhi de waijiao sixiang’ (The Theoretical Basis of China’s Foreign Policy Adjustment: Studying Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s Diplomatic Thought), Waijiao xueyuan bao, Vol. 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominik Mierzejewski
    • 1
  • Bartosz Kowalski
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Int’l & Political StudiesUniversity of Łódź Faculty of Int’l & Political StudiesŁódźPoland

Personalised recommendations