Advertisement

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Applicability and Results for Abdominal Surgery and Impediments for Universal Usage

  • Vikram Kate
  • Mohsina Subair
  • R. Kalayarasan
  • N. Ananthakrishnan
Chapter
Part of the GI Surgery Annual book series (GISA, volume 24)

Abstract

Surgery is a cause of stress, the intensity of which depends on the procedure. Despite a better understanding of the sequence of events leading to the physiological stress response, there has not been any major change in the perioperative care of patients. Perioperative care is often based on the age old so-called inviolable principles [1]. Elements of perioperative care such as prolonged use of drains, forced bed rest, graduated diets, etc. were deemed essential and were taught to successive generations of surgeons as the standard of care. However, in the light of evolving evidence, many of these traditional principles were not found to be evidence based, and some of them may have been detrimental to the patient’s recovery [2–5]. This has led to the need for a judicious evidence-based approach for accelerating the patients’ recovery. The field of perioperative care has witnessed a revolutionary change in the form of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways or ‘fast-track’ protocols, which primarily aim at sustainable improvements in patient care, both in terms of speed of recovery and more importantly quality.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr. Pankaj Kundra, Professor (Senior Scale), Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, and Dr. Suresh Kumar S, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, JIPMER, for their valuable inputs during the writing of this chapter.

Editorial Comment

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols that are being discussed and implemented today are essentially based on evidence. This addresses patient care even before the start of the surgery and is followed both during and after the surgery. The ERAS society guidelines incorporate 22 interventions during the three periods [89]. These are:

Preoperative: Patient education, shared decision-making, nutrition, medical optimization, fluid and carbohydrate loading, avoid fasting, avoid bowel preparation and starting antibiotics

Intraoperative: Prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis, avoid premedication, guarding against nausea and vomiting, using short-acting anaesthetics, avoid fluid electrolyte overload, control normothermia and avoid drains

Postoperative: Epidural anaesthesia/analgesia, avoid Ryles tube, avoid fluid overload, avoid nausea and vomiting, initiation of oral nutrition at the earliest, non-opioid analgesia, early mobilization, stimulating gut motility and audit of compliance

All these strategies promote recovery, decrease stress, alleviate pain, improve gut dysmotility and reduce length of hospitalization. Even the severity of complications is reported to be less [90]. Early discharge from hospital makes patients satisfied [91].

Clearly, ERAS is useful. Unfortunately, despite enough available evidence in favour of ERAS, it is not implemented routinely. It is possibly because surgeons are worried about complications and changing behaviour is always difficult. The things particularly difficult to dispense with are fasting before operation, early mobilization, early oral feeding and avoidance of a drain. Treating physicians feel overawed by these new measures and unjustifiably see these contradictory to prevailing practices. It therefore needs educating the care providers properly and addressing their concerns with evidence. To what extent the 22 facets of care mentioned above are implemented will decide the adoption of ERAS with better patient outcome [92]. It is a pity that not much research has gone into making ERAS acceptable more widely. It is heartening that a group from Canada has taken a lead in this direction. They used theoretical domains framework (TDF) in changing surgical care in hospitals in Alberta. They applied Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) model to assess the implementation of ERAS in colorectal surgery in their province. They have undertaken the project to assess compliance of guidelines, duration of hospitalization, complications and readmission. Through surveys, focus groups, interviews, minutes of meetings and status updates, they have imparted knowledge translation. What they achieved is quite good, e.g. compliance at base level was 40% and increased to 65% after compliance implementation. I feel it is through such measures we can successfully implement ERAS for the benefit of our patients to whom we owe a responsibility.

References

  1. 1.
    Sánchez-Jiménez R, Álvarez AB, López JT, Jiménez AS, Conde FG, Sáez JAC. ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) in colorectal surgery. In: Khan JS, editor. Colorectal cancer: surgery, diagnostics and treatment. 1st ed. London: InTech; 2014. p. 487–503.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD004929.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doglietto GB, Papa V, Tortorelli AP, Bossola M, Covino M, Pacelli F, et al. Nasojejunal tube placement after total gastrectomy: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Contant CM, Hop WC, van’t Sant HP, Oostvogel HJ, Smeets HJ, Stassen LP, et al. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370:2112–7. Erratum in: Lancet 2008;371:1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37:259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schäfer M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:817–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37:285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:879–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melloul E, Hübner M, Scott M, Snowden C, Prentis J, Dejong CH, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016;40:2425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:292–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbølle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg. 2000;232:51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Finnerty CC, Mabvuure NT, Ali A, Kozar RA, Herndon DN. The surgically induced stress response. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37(5 Suppl):21S–9S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Awad S, Varadhan KK, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in elective surgery. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kehlet H. Modification of responses to surgery by neural blockade: clinical implications. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1998. p. 129–75.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holte K, Kehlet H. Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:971–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steenhagen E. Enhanced recovery after surgery: it’s time to change practice! Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31:18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kehlet H. Surgical stress response: does endoscopic surgery confer an advantage? World J Surg. 1999;23:801–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dhar P, Sharma S, Jyaraman M. Fast track surgery. In: Chattopadhyay TK, editor. GI surgery annual, vol. 16. New Delhi: Indian Association of Surgical Gastroenterology; 2009. p. 151–64.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Egbert LD, Battit GE, Welch CE, Bartlett MK. Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instruction of patients. A study of doctor-patient rapport. N Engl J Med. 1964;270:825–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilmore DW, Cheung LY, Harken A. Special problems in perioperative care. Sci Am Surg. 1999;5:1–13.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slim K, Vicaut E, Launay-Savary MV, Contant C, Chipponi J. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2009;249:203–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Güenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD001544.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gatt M, Khan S, MacFie J. In response to: Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:689–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321:1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:641–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Drvar Z, Pavlek M, Drvar V, Tomasević B, Baronica R, Perić M. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients. Acta Med Croatica. 2013;67:407–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J. Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pragatheeswarane M, Muthukumarassamy R, Kadambari D, Kate V. Early oral feeding vs. traditional feeding in patients undergoing elective open bowel surgery—a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1017–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Basse L, Werner M, Kehlet H. Is urinary drainage necessary during continuous epidural analgesia after colonic resection? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:498–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller TE, Gan TJ, Thacker JKM. Enhanced recovery pathways for major abdominal surgery. 2nd enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) USA symposium, October 2014; New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kudsk KA. Gut mucosal nutritional support—enteral nutrition as primary therapy after multiple system trauma. Gut. 1994;35(1 Suppl):S52–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;323:773–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Slim K, Joris J. The egg-and-chicken situation in postoperative enhanced recovery programmes. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bakker N, Cakir H, Doodeman HJ, Houdijk AP. Eight years of experience with enhanced recovery after surgery in patients with colon cancer: impact of measures to improve adherence. Surgery. 2015;157(6):1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gonenc M, Dural AC, Celik F, Akarsu C, Kocatas A, Kalayci MU, et al. Enhanced postoperative recovery pathways in emergency surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg. 2014;207:807–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roulin D, Blanc C, Muradbegovic M, Hahnloser D, Demartines N, Hübner M. Enhanced recovery pathway for urgent colectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:2153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lohsiriwat V. Enhanced recovery after surgery vs conventional care in emergency colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13950–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wisely JC, Barclay KL. Effects of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme on emergency surgical patients. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86:883–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lawrence JK, Keller DS, Samia H, Ermlich B, Brady KM, Nobel T, et al. Discharge within 24 to 72 hours of colorectal surgery is associated with low readmission rates when using enhanced recovery pathways. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:390–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Color Dis. 2009;24:1119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:434–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2:CD007635.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38:1531–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Curtis NJ, Noble E, Salib E, Hipkiss R, Meachim E, Dalton R, et al. Does hospital readmission following colorectal cancer resection and enhanced recovery after surgery affect long term survival? Color Dis. 2017;19:723–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO, Reynolds H, Stulberg J, Senagore A, Champagne B, et al. International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;201:353–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Branagan G, Richardson L, Shetty A, Chave HS. An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery. Int J Color Dis. 2010;25:1359–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, de Jong PJ, van Goor H, Bremers AJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional perioperative care in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:833–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Huibers CJ, de Roos MA, Ong KH. The effect of the introduction of the ERAS protocol in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis. 2012;27:751–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang D, Kong Y, Zhong B, Zhou X, Zhou Y. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized comparison with conventional postoperative care. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:620–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Grantcharov TP, Kehlet H. Laparoscopic gastric surgery in an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1547–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yamada T, Hayashi T, Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Taniguchi H, Fukushima R, et al. Usefulness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol as compared with conventional perioperative care in gastric surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tanaka R, Lee SW, Kawai M, Tashiro K, Kawashima S, Kagota S, et al. Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:861–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chen Hu J, Xin Jiang L, Cai L, Tao Zheng H, Yuan Hu S, Bing Chen H, et al. Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1830–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Berberat PO, Ingold H, Gulbinas A, Kleeff J, Müller MW, Gutt C, et al. Fast track––different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(7):880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di Carlo V. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1387–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    McMillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, Butturini G, Salvia R, Roses RE, et al. Drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy: reappraisal of a prospective randomized trial using risk stratification. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:798–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sutcliffe RP, Hamoui M, Isaac J, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF, Muiesan P, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with low drain fluid amylase. World J Surg. 2015;39:2023–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    MacKay G, O’Dwyer PJ. Early discharge following liver resection for colorectal metastases. Scott Med J. 2008;53:22–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A, et al. Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg. 2008;95:969–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Stoot JH, van Dam RM, Busch OR, van Hillegersberg R, De Boer M, Olde Damink SW, et al. The effect of a multimodal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentre pilot study. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:140–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lin DX, Li X, Ye QW, Lin F, Li LL, Zhang QY. Implementation of a fast-track clinical pathway decreases postoperative length of stay and hospital charges for liver resection. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011;61:413–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Song W, Wang K, Zhang RJ, Dai QX, Zou SB. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in liver surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spring. 2016;5:207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Yang R, Tao W, Chen YY, Zhang BH, Tang JM, Zhong S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;36(Pt A):274–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Xu X, Wang Y, Feng T, Zhao X, Liao Y, Ji W, et al. Nonstrict and individual enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in partial hepatectomy. Spring. 2016;5:2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Dorcaratto D, Grande L, Pera M. Enhanced recovery in gastrointestinal surgery: upper gastrointestinal surgery. Dig Surg. 2013;30:70–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Brodner G, Pogatzki E, Van Aken H, Buerkle H, Goeters C, Schulzki C, et al. A multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation in patients undergoing abdominothoracic esophagectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:228–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Neal JM, Wilcox RT, Allen HW, Low DE. Near-total esophagectomy: the influence of standardized multimodal management and intraoperative fluid restriction. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:328–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Low DE, Kunz S, Schembre D, Otero H, Malpass T, Hsi A, et al. Esophagectomy–it’s not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS, Alexander JR, Bartolucci AA. Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest. 2004;126:1187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Khan S, Gatt M, Horgan A, Anderson I, MacFie J. Guidelines for implementation of enhanced recovery protocols. Issues in professional practice. London: Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; 2009.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Møller MH, Adamsen S, Thomsen RW, Møller AM, Peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) trial group. Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Br J Surg. 2011;98:802–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Huddart S, Peden CJ, Swart M, McCormick B, Dickinson M, Mohammed MA, et al. Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102:57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Nanavati AJ, Prabhakar S. A comparative study of ‘fast-track’ versus traditional peri-operative care protocols in gastrointestinal surgeries. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:757–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Nanavati AJ, Prabhakar S. Fast-tracking colostomy closures. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(Suppl 3):1148–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Malik AA, Sumat-ul-khurshid, Chowdhri NA, Parray FQ. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries. Int J Surg Res. 2013;2:57–62.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sahoo MR, Gowda MS, Kumar AT. Early rehabilitation after surgery program versus conventional care during perioperative period in patients undergoing laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10:132–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Mohsina S, Shanmugam D, Sureshkumar S, Kundra P, Mahalakshmy T, Kate V. Adapted ERAS pathway vs. standard care in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer—a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011;254:868–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano MR, Andriulli A, et al. A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2011;396:345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A, Ruiz-de-Angulo D, Pastor P, Parrilla P. Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:714–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gramlich LM, Sheppard CE, Wasylak T, Gilmour LE, Ljungqvist O, Basualdo-Hammond C, et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery: a strategy to transform surgical care across a health system. Implement Sci. 2017;12:67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N, Zurich Fast Track Study Group. A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:842–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Müller JM, Schwenk W. ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1463–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Thanh NX, Chuck AW, Wasylak T, Lawrence J, Faris P, Ljungqvist O, et al. An economic evaluation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta. Can J Surg. 2016;59:415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association of Surgical Gastroenterology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vikram Kate
    • 1
  • Mohsina Subair
    • 2
  • R. Kalayarasan
    • 3
  • N. Ananthakrishnan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of General and Gastrointestinal SurgeryJawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)PuducherryIndia
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryJawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)PuducherryIndia
  3. 3.Department of Surgical GastroenterologyJawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)PuducherryIndia
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryMahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research InstitutePuducherryIndia

Personalised recommendations