Advertisement

Intellectuals and the Disorganised Social Movements in East Java: The Lapindo Mudflow Case

  • Airlangga Pribadi Kusman
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses its description on the relationship between intellectuals and marginalised community groups especially in the case of Lapindo mud victims in Porong sub-district of Sidoarjo. This chapter explains the role and position of the intellectuals as agents of the social movements which see themselves as intellectuals who are striving to facilitate the marginalised groups to fight for their interests and aspirations in governance practices especially as citizens victimised by Lapindo mudflow disaster.

Bibliography

  1. Ali Azhar Akbar. (2012). Konspirasi di Balik Lumpur Lapindo: Dari Aktor Hingga Strategi Kotor. Galang Press.Google Scholar
  2. Azhar, A. A. (2010). Konspirasi SBY-Bakrie Jakarta. Mosaic Institute, Law Indonesia, gerakan melawan lumpur Lapindo. Jakarta: Gerbang Rakyat Semesta.Google Scholar
  3. Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Soeharto: Compromise, resistance, and regime change in Indonesia. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Batubara, B., & Utomo, P. W. (2012). Kronik lumpur Lapindo: Skandal bencana industri pengeboran migas di Sidoarjo. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bayat, A. (2012). Marginality: Curse or cure? In R. Bush & H. Ayeb (Eds.), Marginality and Exclusion in Egypt (pp. 14–27). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, J. S. (2011). Challenging governance theory: From networks to hegemony. London and Chicago: Policy Press and Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, J. S., & Pill, M. (2012). Hollowing out neighbourhood governance? Rescaling revitalization in Baltimore and Bristol. Urban Studies, 49(10), 2199–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhakidae, D. (2003). Cendekiawan dan kekuasaan dalam negara Orde Baru. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Google Scholar
  11. Eldridge, P. J. (1995). Non-government organizations and democratic participation in Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur and New York. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eklof, S. (2003). Power and political culture in Soeharto’s Indonesia: The Indonesian Democratic Party (PDI) and the fall of the New Order. Netherland: NIAS.Google Scholar
  13. Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1991). Social movements: A cognitive approach. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q., & Nowell-Smith, G. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. USA: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Gustomy, R. (2010). Menjinakkan Negara, Menundukkan Masyarakat: Menelusuri Jejak Strategi Kuasa PT Lapindo Brantas Inc. In H. Prasetia (Ed.), Bencana industri dan masyarakat sipil dalam penanganan lumpur Lapindo (pp. 31–98). Depok: Desantara.Google Scholar
  16. Gustomy, R. (2012). Menjinakkan Negara, menundukkan Masyarakat: Menelusuri Jejak Strategi Kuasa PT Lapindo Brantas Inc. In H. Prasetia (Ed.), Bencana Industri: Kekalahan Negara dan Masyarakat Sipil dalam penanganan Lumpur Lapindo. Depok: Desantara. (Translation: “Domesticating the State, the Public Forfeit: The Loss of the State and Civil Society in Managing the Lumpur Lapindo Conflict).Google Scholar
  17. Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hikam, Muhammad A. S. (1996). Demokrasi dan civil society. Jakarta: LP3ESGoogle Scholar
  19. Joseph, J. (2002). Hegemony: A realist analysis. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurniawan, J. A. (1991). Lumpur Lapindo: Sebuah Potret Mitos Tentang Negara Hukum Indonesia. Yayasan Desantara Jakarta.Google Scholar
  21. Kurniawan, J. A. (2010). Lumpur Lapindo: Sebuah potret mitos tentang negara hukum Indonesia. In Heru Prasetia (Ed.), Bencana industri: Kekalahan negara dan masyarakat sipil dalam penanganan lumpur Lapindo (pp. 99–148). Depok: Desantara.Google Scholar
  22. Mudhoffir, A. M. (2013). Berebut kebenaran: Politik pembentukan subjek pada kasus Lapindo. In A. Novenanto (Ed.), Membingkai Lapindo: Pendekatan konstruksi sosial atas kasus Lapindo, sebuah bunga rampai (pp. 17–48). Jakarta and Yogyakarta: Media Link and Penerbit Kanisius.Google Scholar
  23. Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schiller, J., Lucas, A., & Sulistiyanto, P. (2008). Learning from the East Java mudflow: Disaster politics in Indonesia. Indonesia, 85(April), 51–77.Google Scholar
  25. Tapsell, R. (2012). Politics and the press in Indonesia. Media Asia, 39(2), 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Uhlin, Anders. (1993). Transnational Democratic Diffusion and Indonesian Democracy Discourses. Third World Quaterly, 14(3), 517–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Utomo, P. W. (2010). Bangkit di tengah keterpurukan: Perjalanan GEPPRES menuntut hak. In H. Prasetia (Ed.), Bencana industri dan masyarakat sipil dalam penanganan lumpur Lapindo. Depok: Desantara.Google Scholar
  28. Winters, J. A. (1996). Power in motion: Capital mobility and the Indonesian state. Cornel, USA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Airlangga Pribadi Kusman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsAirlangga UniversitySurabayaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations