Influence of Cooling Intensity Difference Between Upper and Lower Surface to the Residual Stress Distribution of 7050 Aluminum Alloy Plates

  • Junqiang Wang
  • Guanmei Niu
  • Zhongyu Yang
  • Hailong Cao
  • Cheng Liu
Conference paper

Abstract

Residual stress of aluminum alloy thick plates causes distortion in subsequent machining operations for aircraft components. During spray quenching the different cooling rates applied across the plate thickness to produce residual stresses. If differential cooling is applied to the upper and lower surfaces, this could lead to an asymmetric distribution of residual stress on both sides of plate. This in turn causes potentially uncontrollable part distortion and dimensional inaccuracy during the machining operation. In this study, a finite element (FE) model, taking into account of the different cooling intensity on the upper and lower surfaces, was established to predict the residual stress. Residual stress was measured using an ultrasonic stress measuring apparatus. The results showed that the residual stress on the upper surface was −174 MPa when the applied water flux was 350 m3/h, and −194 MPa on the opposite surface where the corresponding water flux was 300 m3/h. This was found to be in good agreement with the simulation results. It was found that the residual compressive stress on the surface with the higher cooling intensity was smaller than the side with lower intensity which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Therefore, based on the difference of cooling intensity on the two surfaces, the guidance for utilizing the roller-quenching-equipment can be derived finally.

Keywords

7050 aluminum alloy Aerospace Residual stress Quenching Pre-stretching process Finite element model 

References

  1. 1.
    T. Wang, Z. Yin, Research status and development trend of ultrahigh strength aluminum alloys, Chinese Journal of Rare Metals. 30 (2006) 197–202.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Cao, Y. Wu, H. Gong, Z, Yang, Simulation and Analysis of Temperature Field and Stress Field for 7050 Al Alloy, Hot Working Technology. 44 (2015) 202–205.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Ke, H. Dong, Pre-stretching process and its application in reducing residual stress of quenched 7075 aluminum alloy thick-plates, The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals. 14 (2004) 639–645.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Zhang, H. Ding, L Pu, Simulation Research on Temperature Filed and Thermal Stress Field of 7050 Aluminum Alloy Part in Quenching Process, Hot Working Technology. 42 (2013)149–152.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Cao, Study on non-uniform heat transfer and cooling characteristics of spray quenching of aluminum alloy thick plate, Master of Central South University (2011).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Cao, C. Xiong, Y Deng, X. Zhang, Effect of single-side injection quenching parameters on cooling of 7050 aluminum alloy plate, Journal of Aeronautical Materials. 31 (2011) 31–35.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Guo. Experimental and Simulation Study on spray quenching of 7050 aluminum alloy, Master of Central South University (2010).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Li, Y. Wu, H. Gong, F. Xiao, FEM and Contour Method Study of Quenching Residual Stress of 7050 Aluminum Alloy Cross-Shaped Component, Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications, 887 (2017) 89–95.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Xiong, Y. Deng, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Thermal simulation on surface heat transfer coefficient during quench of 7050 Al alloy by water spraying, Materials Science and Engineering of Powder Metallurgy. 15 (2010) 421–426.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Zhang, H. Ding, L. Pu, Simulation Research on Temperature Filed and Thermal Stress Field of 7050 Aluminum Alloy Part in Quenching Process, Hot Working Technology. 42 (2013) 149–152.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Wang, J. Han, J. P. Domblesky, W. Li, Z. Yang, Y. Zhao, Predicting distortion in butt welded plates using an equivalent plane stress representation based on inherent shrinkage volume, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 138 (2016) 011–012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Qin, J. Cui, Experimental research and numerical simulation for the temperature field in the casting of aluminum alloys, Journal of plasticity engineering. 14 (2007) 16–19.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Xu, W. Song, Q. Pan, X. Li, X. Jin, H. Liu, Residual stress nondestructive testing method using ultrasonic, Nondestructive Testing. 36 (2014) 25–31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Deng, S. Guo, C. Xiong, X. Zhang, Effect of water spraying parameters on heat transfer coefficient of 7050 aluminum alloy during quench, Journal of Aeronautical Materials. 30 (2010) 21–26.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Wang, Y. Kang, C. Li, Phase Diagram and Phase Equilibrium Studies on Ultra High Temperature Alloys of Nb-Si-Ti, Materials Science Forum. 849 (2016) 618–625.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junqiang Wang
    • 1
  • Guanmei Niu
    • 1
  • Zhongyu Yang
    • 1
  • Hailong Cao
    • 1
  • Cheng Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Chinalco Materials Application Research Institute Co., Ltd.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations