Advertisement

Role of Microbial Seed Priming and Microbial Phytohormone in Modulating Growth Promotion and Defense Responses in Plants

  • Vivek Singh
  • Anupam Maharshi
  • Dhananjaya P. Singh
  • Ram Sanmukh Upadhyay
  • Birinchi Kumar Sarma
  • Harikesh Bahadur Singh
Chapter

Abstract

Plant growth and development are greatly affected by various biotic and abiotic stresses. Various strategies are utilized to minimize stresses in plants. Seed priming with beneficial microorganisms is one of the most beneficial methods to improve plant growth and development and induce systemic tolerance in plants towards biotic as well as abiotic stresses. Seed priming is a method of conditioning the seeds by plant growth-promoting microbes which provide better abilities to the plant to withstand various environmental challenges beginning from seed germination. Seed priming with beneficial microorganism is also known as bio-priming that enhances seed germination, protects germinating seed from different phytopathogens, and provides suitable conditions for establishment of the plant. Bio-priming has several mechanisms to stimulate morphogenesis and plant immunity, viz., production of phytohormones, induced expression of plant growth-promoting genes, increased nutrient status into the plant, mycoparasitism, antibiosis, induced phenolic production, activation of antioxidant production, and systemic defense activation. Some important microorganisms that synthesize phytohormones include Azotobacter spp., Pantoea agglomerans, Rhodospirillum rubrum, Rhizobium spp., Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Paenibacillus polymyxa, Trichoderma spp., Pseudomonas putida, Rhizobium phaseoli, Bacillus cereus, and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. The main objective of this chapter is to enlighten the importance of seed priming with microorganisms and the role of different phytohormones produced by them in modulating growth, development, and defense activation in the host plant.

Keywords

Seed biopriming Microbial phytohormone Plant growth promotion Defense responses 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India, for awarding project grant (BT/PR5990/AGR/5/587/2012). BKS and HBS are also thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, for providing financial assistance through the grant ICAR-NBAIM/AMAAS/2014-15/73. The authors are also grateful to Technology Development Component of the ICAR seed project.

References

  1. Arkhipova TN, Veselov SU, Melentiev AI, Martynenko EV, Kudoyarova GR (2005) Ability of bacterium Bacillus subtilis to produce cytokinins and to influence the growth and endogenous hormone content of lettuce plants. Plant Soil 272:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atzorn R, Crozier A, Wheeler CT, Sandberg G (1988) Production of gibberellins and indole-3-acetic acid by Rhizobium phaseoli in relation to nodulation of Phaseolus vulgaris roots. Planta 175:532–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Azcon R, Barea JM (1975) Synthesis of auxins, gibberellins and cytokinins by Azotobacter vinelandii and Azotobacter beijerinckii related to effects produced on tomato plants. Plant Soil 43:609–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bal HB, Nayak L, Das S et al (2013) Isolation of ACC deaminase PGPR from rice rhizosphere and evaluating their plant growth promoting activity under salt stress. Plant Soil 366:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett AJ, Whipps JM (2008) Dual application of beneficial microorganisms to seed during drum priming. Appl Soil Ecol 38:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisen K, Keswani C, Mishra S, Saxena A, Rakshit A, Singh HB (2015) Unrealized potential of seed biopriming for versatile agriculture. In: Rakshit A, Singh HB, Sen A (eds) Nutrient use efficiency: from basics to advances. Springer, New Delhi, pp 193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjorkman T, Blanchard LM, Harman GE (1998) Growth enhancement of shrunken-2 (sh2) sweet corn by Trichoderma harzianum 1295-22: effect of environmental stress. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:35–40Google Scholar
  8. Bomke C, Tudzynski B (2009) Diversity, regulation, and evolution of the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway in fungi compared to plants and bacteria. Phytochemistry 70:1876–1893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Callan NW, Mathre D, Miller JB (1990) Bio-priming seed treatment for biological control of Pythium ultimum preemergence damping-off in sh-2 sweet corn. Plant Dis 74:368–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callan NW, Mathre DE, Miller JB (1991) Field performance of sweet corn seed bio-primed and coated with Pseudomonas fluorescens AB254. Hortic Sci 26:1163–1165Google Scholar
  11. Chakraborty U, Chakraborty BN, Chakraborty AP et al (2013) Water stress amelioration and plant growth promotion in wheat plants by osmotic stress tolerant bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:789–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chevalier F, Rossignol M (2011) Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes with contrasted root architecture in response to phosphate deficiency. J Plant Physiol 168:1885–1890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, Cortés-Penagos C, López-Bucio J (2009) Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 149:1579–1592CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia de Salamone IE, Hynes RK, Nelson LM (2001) Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants. Can J Microbiol 47:404–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica (Cairo) 2012:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JD (1996) Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell 8:1773CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Harman GE, Taylor AG (1988) Improved seedling performance by integration of biological control agents at favorable pH levels with solid matrix priming. Phytopathology 78:520–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harman GE, Petzoldt R, Comis A, Chen J (2004) Interactions between Trichoderma harzianum strain T22 and maize inbred line Mo17 and effects of these interactions on diseases caused by Pythium ultimum and Colletotrichum graminicola. Phytopathology 94:147–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell SH, Lall S, Che P (2003) Cytokinins and shoot development. Trends Plant Sci 8:453–459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jaderlund L, Arthurson V, Granhall U et al (2008) Specific interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting bacteria: as revealed by different combinations. FEMS Microbiol Lett 287:174–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jain A, Singh A, Singh S, Singh HB (2013) Microbial consortium-induced changes in oxidative stress markers in pea plants challenged with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J Plant Growth Regul 32:388–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jain A, Singh A, Chaudhary A, Singh S et al (2014) Modulation of nutritional and antioxidant potential of seeds and pericarp of pea pods treated with microbial consortium. Food Res Int 64:275–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jain A, Singh A, Singh S, Singh HB (2015) Biological management of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in pea using plant growth promoting microbial consortium. J Basic Microbiol 55:961–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jha A, Saxena J, Sharma V (2013) An investigation on phosphate solubilization potential of agricultural soil bacteria as affected by different phosphorus sources, temperature, salt and pH. Commun Soil Sci Plan 44:2443–2458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joo GJ, Kim YM, Kim JT, Rhee IK, Kim JH, Lee IJ (2005) Gibberellins-producing rhizobacteria increase endogenous gibberellins content and promote growth of red peppers. J Microbiol 43(6):510–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang SM, Joo GJ, Hamayun M, Na CI, Shin DH, Kim HY, Hong JK, Lee IJ (2009) Gibberellin production and phosphate solubilization by newly isolated strain of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and its effect on plant growth. Biotechnol Lett 31:277–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Keswani C, Mishra S, Sarma BK, Singh SP, Singh HB (2014) Unraveling the efficient applications of secondary metabolites of various Trichoderma spp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:533–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Keswani C, Bisen K, Singh V, Sarma BK, Singh HB (2016) Formulation technology of biocontrol agents: present status and future prospects. In: Arora NK, Mehnaz S, Balestrini R (eds) Bioformulations: for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New Delhi, pp 35–52Google Scholar
  29. Kohler J, Hernandez JA, Caravaca F, Roldan A (2009) Induction of antioxidant enzymes is involved in the greater effectiveness of a PGPR versus AM fungi with respect to increasing the tolerance of lettuce to severe salt stress. Environ Exp Bot 65:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krouk G, Crawford NM, Coruzzi GM, Tsay YF (2010) Nitrate signaling: adaptation to fluctuating environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar A, Maurya BR, Raghuwanshi R (2014) Isolation and characterization of PGPR and their effect on growth, yield and nutrient content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 3:121–228Google Scholar
  32. Kumar G, Maharshi A, Patel J, Mukherjee A, Singh HB, Sarma BK (2016) Trichoderma: a potential fungal antagonist to control plant diseases. SATSA Mukhapatra 21:206–218Google Scholar
  33. Lavakush YJ, Verma JP, Jaiswal DK et al (2014) Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa). Ecol Eng 62:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leibfried A, To JP, Busch W, Stehling S, Kehle A, Demar M, Kieber JJ, Lohmann JU (2005) WUSCHEL controls meristem function by direct regulation of cytokinin-inducible response regulators. Nature 438:1172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Maathuis FJM (2009) Physiological functions of mineral macronutrients. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:250–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahmood A, Turgay OC, Farooq M, Hayat R (2016) Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a review. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92 (fiw112)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martínez-Morales LJ, Soto-Urzúa L, Baca BE, Sánchez-Ahédo JA (2003) Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) production in culture medium by wild strain Azospirillum brasilense. FEMS Microbiol Lett 228:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Masciarelli O, Llanes A, Luna V (2014) A new PGPR co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum enhances soybean nodulation. Microbiol Res 169:609–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mauch-Mani B, Baccelli I, Luna E, Flors V (2017) Defense priming: an adaptive part of induced resistance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 68:485–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (1999) Effect of wild-type and mutant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the rooting of mung bean cuttings. J Plant Growth Regul 18:49–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McQuilken MP, Halmer P, Rhodes DJ (1998) Application of microorganisms to seeds. In: Formulation of microbial biopesticides. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 255–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meena S, Rakshit A, Meena VS (2016) Effect of seed bio-priming and N doses under varied soil type on nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under greenhouse conditions. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 12:172–178Google Scholar
  43. Meena S, Rakshit A, Singh HB, Meena VS (2017) Effect of nitrogen levels and seed bio-priming on root infection, growth and yield attributes of wheat in varied soil type. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 12:172–178Google Scholar
  44. Nadeem SM, Zaheer ZA, Naveed M et al (2013) Mitigation of salinity-induced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions. Ann Microbiol 63:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nieto KF, Frankenberger WT (1989) Biosynthesis of cytokinins by Azotobacter chroococcum. Soil Biol Biochem 21:967–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ortíz-Castro R, Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, López-Bucio J (2009) The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav 4:701–712CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Pandey PK, Yadav SK, Singh A, Sarma BK, Mishra A, Singh HB (2012) Cross-species alleviation of biotic and abiotic stresses by the endophyte Pseudomonas aeruginosa PW09. J Phytopathol 160:532–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Patel JS, Singh A, Singh HB, Sarma BK (2015) Plant genotype, microbial recruitment and nutritional security. Front Plant Sci 6:608.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00608 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Patel JS, Sarma BK, Singh HB, Upadhyay RS, Kharwar RN, Ahmed M (2016) Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma asperellum enhance expression of Gα subunits of the pea heterotrimeric G-protein during Erysiphe pisi infection. Front Plant Sci 6:1206.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01206 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3795–3801CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Paulucci NS, Gallarato LA, Reguera YB et al (2015) Arachis hypogaea PGPR isolated from Argentine soil modifies its lipids components in response to temperature and salinity. Microbiol Res 173:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Raja N (2013) Biopesticides and biofertilizers: ecofriendly sources for sustainable agriculture. J Biofertil Biopestic.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6202.1000e112
  53. Rakshit A, Pal S, Meena S, Manjhee B, Rai S, Rai A, Bhowmick MK, Singh HB (2014) Seed bio-priming: a potential tool in integrated resource management. SATSA Mukhaptra Ann Tech 18:94–103Google Scholar
  54. Rakshit A, Singh HB, Sen A (2015a) Nutrient use efficiency: from basics to advances. Springer, New DelhiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rakshit A, Sunita K, Pal S, Singh A, Singh HB (2015b) Bio-priming mediated nutrient use efficiency of crop species. In: Rakshit A, Singh HB and Sen A (eds) Nutrient use efficiency: from basics to advances. Springer, New Delhi, pp 181–191Google Scholar
  56. Ray S, Yadav SK, Sarma BK, Singh HB, Singh S (2017) How the microbial consortium enhances the stress tolerance in plants during various environmental conditions. In: Singh SS (ed) Plants and microbes in ever changing environment. Nova Science Publisher, New York, pp 71–82Google Scholar
  57. Reddy PP (2013) Bio-priming of seeds. In: Reddy PP (ed) Recent advances in crop protection. Springer, New Delhi, pp 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Revillas JJ, Rodelas B, Pozo C, Martinez-Toledo MV, González-Lopez J (2000) Production of B-group vitamins by two Azotobacter strains with phenolic compounds as sole carbon source under diazotrophic and adiazotrophic conditions. J Appl Microbiol 89:486–493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Rojas-Tapias D, Moreno-Galvan A, Pardo-Diaz S et al (2012) Effect of inoculation with plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Appl Soil Ecol 61:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sarkar A, Patel JS, Yadav S, Sarma BK, Srivastava JS, Singh HB (2014) Studies on rhizosphere-bacteria mediated biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Vegetos 27(1):158–169Google Scholar
  61. Sarma BK, Yadav SK, Singh DP, Singh HB (2012) Rhizobacteria mediated induced systemic tolerance in plants: prospects for abiotic stress management. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: stress management. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sarma BK, Yadav SK, Singh S, Singh HB (2015) Microbial consortium mediated plant defense against phytopathogens: readdressing for enhancing efficacy. Soil Biol Biochem 87:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharif RS (2012) Study of nitrogen rates effects and seed biopriming with PGPR on quantitative and qualitative yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Tech J Eng Appl Sci 2:162–166Google Scholar
  64. Singh HB (2016) Seed biopriming: a comprehensive approach towards agricultural sustainability. Indian Phytopathol 69:203–209Google Scholar
  65. Singh A, Jain A, Sarma BK, Upadhyay RS, Singh HB (2013a) Rhizosphere microbes facilitate redox homeostasis in Cicer arietinum against biotic stress. Ann Appl Biol 163:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Singh A, Sarma BK, Upadhyay RS, Singh HB (2013b) Compatible rhizosphere microbes mediated alleviation of biotic stress in chickpea through enhanced antioxidant and phenylpropanoid activities. Microbiol Res 168:33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Singh A, Jain A, Sarma BK, Upadhyay RS, Singh HB (2014) Rhizosphere competent microbial consortium mediates rapid changes in phenolic profiles in chickpea during Sclerotium rolfsii infection. Microbiol Res 169:353–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Singh V, Upadhyay RS, Sarma BK, Singh HB (2016a) Seed bio-priming with Trichoderma asperellum effectively modulate plant growth promotion in pea. Int J Agric Environ Biotech 9:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Singh V, Upadhyay RS, Sarma BK, Singh HB (2016b) Trichoderma asperellum spore dose depended modulation of plant growth in vegetable crops. Microbiol Res 193:74–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Singh BN, Dwivedi P, Sarma BK, Singh GS, Singh HB (2018) Trichoderma asperellum T42 reprograms tobacco for enhanced nitrogen utilization efficiency and plant growth when fed with N nutrients. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:163Google Scholar
  71. Sinha RK, Valani D, Chauhan K, Agarwal S (2014) Embarking on a second green revolution for sustainable agriculture by vermiculture biotechnology using earthworms: reviving the dreams of Sir Charles Darwin. Int J Agric Health Saf 1:50–64Google Scholar
  72. Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J (2011) Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:001438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Taller BJ, Wong TY (1989) Cytokinins in Azotobacter vinelandii culture medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:266–267PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Timmusk S, Nicander B, Granhall U, Tillberg E (1999) Cytokinin production by Paenibacillus polymyxa. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1847–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tsavkelova EA, Klimova SY, Cherdyntseva TA, Netrusov AI (2006) Microbial producers of plant growth stimulators and their practical use: a review. Appl Biochem Microbiol 42:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) (2013) World population projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050. UN DESA, New York. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/un-report-world-population-projected to-reach-9-6- billion-by-2050.html Google Scholar
  77. Valencia-Cantero E, Hernández-Calderón E, Velázquez-Becerra C, López-Meza JE, Alfaro-Cuevas R, López-Bucio J (2007) Role of dissimilatory fermentative iron-reducing bacteria in Fe uptake by common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants grown in alkaline soil. Plant Soil 291:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wright B, Rowse H, Whipps JM (2003) Microbial population dynamics on seeds during drum and steeping priming. Plant Soil 255:631–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yadav SK, Dave A, Sarkar A, Singh HB, Sarma BK (2013) Co-inoculated Biopriming with Trichoderma, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium improves crop growth in Cicer arietinum and Phaseolus vulgaris. Intern J Agri Environ Biotech 6(2):255–259Google Scholar
  80. Yadav SK, Singh S, Singh HB, Sarma BK (2017) Compatible rhizosphere-competent microbial consortium adds value to the nutritional quality in edible parts of chickpea. J Agric Food Chem 65(30):6122–6130.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01326 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Younesi O, Moradi A (2014) Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) on antioxidant enzyme activities in salt-stressed bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agric (Polnohospodˇ arstvo) 60:10–21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivek Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anupam Maharshi
    • 3
  • Dhananjaya P. Singh
    • 1
  • Ram Sanmukh Upadhyay
    • 2
  • Birinchi Kumar Sarma
    • 3
  • Harikesh Bahadur Singh
    • 3
  1. 1.ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important MicroorganismsMaunath BhanjanIndia
  2. 2.Department of Botany, Institute of ScienceBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural SciencesBHUVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations