Advertisement

Ultra-Short Entropy for Mental Stress Detection

  • Rossana Castaldo
  • Luis Montesinos
  • Leandro Pecchia
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 68/2)

Abstract

Approximate Entropy (ApEn) and Sample Entropy (SampEn) are measures of signals’ complexity and are widely used in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) analysis. In particular, recent studies proved that almost all the features measuring complexity of RR series statistically decreased during the stress and therefore, thus showing ability to detect stress. However, the choice of the similarity threshold r and minimum data length N required for their computation are still controversial. In fact, most entropy measures are considered not reliable for recordings shorter than 5 min and different threshold values r have shown to affect the analysis thus leading to incorrect conclusions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to understand the impact of changing parameters r and N for the computation of ApEn and SampEn and to select the optimal parameters to detect stress in healthy subjects. To accomplish it, 84 RR series, extracted from electrocardiography signals acquired during real-life stress, were analyzed. ApEn and SampEn were estimated for two different values of r computed using previously published methods and for N = {100, 200, 300, 400, 500} data points. The statistical significance for the differences in mean ApEn and SampEn values was assessed by non-parametric tests. The two methods used to compute r produced entropy values significantly different over different N values. In contrast, ApEn and SampEn showed consistency in differentiating rest and stress conditions for different input parameters. More specifically, ApEnChon and SampEnChon showed to have a better discrimination power between stressed subjects and resting subjects on ultra-short recordings (N < 500).

Keywords

Entropy Heart rate variability Ultra-short term 

Notes

Acknowledgements

R. C. thanks the Institute of Advanced Study Early Career Fellowship at University of Warwick, UK.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Force, T., Heart rate variability guidelines: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. European Heart Journal, 1996. 17: p. 354–381.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pincus, S., Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991. 88: p. 2297–2301.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melillo, P., M. Bracale, and L. Pecchia, Nonlinear Heart Rate Variability features for real-life stress detection. Case study: students under stress due to university examination. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 2011. 10(1): p. 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pincus, S. and A. Goldberger, Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify? Am J Physiol, 1994. 266: p. H1643–H1656.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu, S., et al., Automatic selection of the threshold value r for approximate entropy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2008. 55(8): p. 1966–1972.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castiglioni, P. and M. Di Rienzo. How the threshold “r” influences approximate entropy analysis of heart-rate variability. in Computers in Cardiology, 2008. 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salahuddin, L., et al., Ultra short term analysis of heart rate variability for monitoring mental stress in mobile settings. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2007. 2007: p. 4656–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yentes, J.M., et al., The appropriate use of approximate entropy and sample entropy with short data sets. Annals of biomedical engineering, 2013. 41(2): p. 349–365.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chon, K.H., C.G. Scully, and S. Lu, Approximate Entropy for all Signals Is the Recommended Threshold Value r Appropriate? Ieee Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 2009. 28(6): p. 18–23.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rajendra Acharya, U., et al., Heart rate variability: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2006. 44(12): p. 1031–51.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, C.Y., et al., Comparison of different threshold values r for approximate entropy: application to investigate the heart rate variability between heart failure and healthy control groups. Physiological Measurement, 2011. 32(2): p. 167–180.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melillo, P., et al. Approximate Entropy for Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Analysis: Is the Threshold Value Computed by Chon’s Formula Appropriate? in The International Conference on Health Informatics. 2014. Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de MexicoMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations