Advertisement

Model Order Reduction Using Fuzzy C-Means Clustering and Particle Swarm Optimization

  • Nitin Singh
  • Niraj K. Choudhary
  • Rudar K. Gautam
  • Shailesh Tiwari
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 670)

Abstract

The hybrid method which combines the evolutionary programming technique, i.e., based on the swarm optimization algorithm and fuzzy c-means clustering method is used for reducing the model order of high-order linear time-invariant systems in the presented work. The process of clustering is used for finding the group of objects with similar nature that can be differentiated from the other dissimilar objects. The reduction of the numerator of original high-order model is done using the particle swarm optimization algorithm, and fuzzy c-means clustering technique is used for reducing the denominator of the higher-order model. The stability of the model is also verified using the pole zero stability analysis, and it was found that the obtained reduced-order model is stable. Further, the transient and steady state response of the obtained lower-order model as compared to the other existing techniques are better. The output of the obtained lower-order model is also compared with the other existing techniques in the literature in terms of ISE, ITSE, IAE, and ITAE.

Keywords

Model order reduction Fuzzy c-means clustering Particle swarm optimization Pole clustering Fuzzy logic 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Bandyopadhyay and S. Lamba, “Time-domain Pade approximation and modal-Pade method for multivariable systems,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 91–94, Jan. 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Enright and M. Kamel, “On selecting a low-order model using the dominant mode concept,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 976–978, Oct. 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Hutton and B. Friedland, “Routh approximations for reducing order of linear, time-invariant systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 329–337, Jun. 1975.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Krishnamurthy and V. Seshadri, “Model reduction using the Routh stability criterion,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 729–731, Aug. 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. N. Lucas, “Some further observations on the differentiation method of modal reduction,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1389–1391, Sep. 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Singh, D. Chandra, and H. Kar, “Improved Routh–PadÉ Approximants: A Computer-Aided Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 292–296, Feb. 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. N. Lucas, “Scaled impulse energy approximation for model reduction,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 791–793, Aug. 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Saxena, A. Tripathi, K. K. Mishra, and A. K. Misra, “Dynamic-PSO: An improved particle swarm optimizer,” 2015, pp. 212–219.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Mukherjee, Satakshi, and R. C. Mittal, “Model order reduction using response-matching technique,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 342, no. 5, pp. 503–519, Aug. 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Hammouda and F. Karray, “A comparative study of data clustering techniques,” University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Napoleon and S. Pavalakodi, “A new method for dimensionality reduction using K-means clustering algorithm for high dimensional data set,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 41–46, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Kennedy, J. F. Kennedy, R. C. Eberhart, and Y. Shi, Swarm intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Zeugmann et al., “Particle Swarm Optimization,” in Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, C. Sammut and G. I. Webb, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011, pp. 760–766.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Shi and R. Eberhart, “A modified particle swarm optimizer,” 1998, pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Alatas, E. Akin, and A. B. Ozer, “Chaos embedded particle swarm optimization algorithms,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1715–1734, May 2009.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. B. Vishwakarma and R. Prasad, “System reduction using modified pole clustering and Pade approximation,” in XXXII National systems conference, NSC, 2008, pp. 592–596.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. G. Safonov and R. Y. Chiang, “Model reduction for robust control: A schur relative error method,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 259–272, Dec. 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Pal, “Stable reduced-order Padé approximants using the Routh-Hurwitz array,” Electronics Letters, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 225, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Prasad and J. Pal, “Stable reduction of linear systems by continued fractions,” Journal-Institution of Engineers India Part El Electrical Engineering Division, vol. 72, pp. 113–113, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Gutman, C. Mannerfelt, and P. Molander, “Contributions to the model reduction problem,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 454–455, Apr. 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nitin Singh
    • 1
  • Niraj K. Choudhary
    • 1
  • Rudar K. Gautam
    • 1
  • Shailesh Tiwari
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringMNNIT AllahabadAllahabadIndia
  2. 2.ABES Engineering CollegeGhaziabadIndia

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options