Customer Value in the Sharing Economy Platform: The Airbnb Case

  • Hong Ngoc Nguyen
  • Timo RintamäkiEmail author
  • Hannu Saarijärvi
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 11)


The sharing economy is a platform-based business model in which users are directly connected for creation, sharing, and exchange of goods or services that draw on underused resources. While this emerging phenomenon has been studied from several perspectives, including the technical, social, and economic, limited investigation has been conducted from the customer perspective. A study was carried out to narrow this research gap by applying the customer viewpoint to explore and analyse how the sharing economy reconfigures value creation. To reach the goal for this research, an interpretive approach was taken to the case of Airbnb. Customers’ experiences of using the sharing economy were examined to disentangle the economic, functional, emotional, and symbolic benefits and sacrifices that together capture the diversity of customer-perceived value of the sharing economy. Customer value is discussed as an important conceptual tool to identify and pinpoint the distinguishing characteristics of the sharing economy and to explore how conventional businesses and emerging sharing-economy platforms can recognise and capitalise on their competitive advantages. While the sharing economy gives customers alternatives that involve easier consumption methods at lower cost, it also provides a unique, personal, and socially integrated experience. This can contribute to values that extend beyond traditional hospitality management and thus imbue sharing-economy platforms with a unique and sustainable competitive advantage.


Customer value Sharing economy Service platform 


  1. Airbnb. (2012). San Francisco impact report. Accessed 1 Apr 2017.
  2. Airbnb. (2017). Airbnb, Inc. Accessed 1 Apr 2017.
  3. Alam, I. (2005). Fieldwork and data collection in qualitative marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avital, M., Andersson, M., Nickerson, J., Sundararajan, A., Van Alstyne, M., & Verhoeven, D. (2014). The collaborative economy: A disruptive innovation or much ado about nothing? In Thirty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–8), Auckland.Google Scholar
  5. Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botsman, R. (2013). The sharing economy lacks a shared definition. Retrieved October 1, 2016, from
  8. Botsman, R. (2014). Sharing’s not just for start-ups. Harvard Business Review, 92(9), 23–25.Google Scholar
  9. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). Beyond Zipcar: Collaborative consumption. Harvard Business Review, 88(10), 30.Google Scholar
  10. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2012). What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  11. Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C. (2016). What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee) – Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budget and Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2015). Analysis of the impact of short-term rentals on housing. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. Camilleri, J., & Neuhofer, B. (2017). Value co-creation and co-destruction in the Airbnb sharing economy. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(9), 2322–2340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cusumano, M. A. (2014). How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy. Communications of the ACM, 58, 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005). Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Research Policy, 34, 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denning, S. (2014). An economy of access is opening for business: Five strategies for success. Strategic Leadership, 42, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2014). ‘Systematic combining’ – A decade later. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1277–1284. Scholar
  18. Edelman, B., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2017). Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
  19. Ert, E., Fleischer, A., & Magen, N. (2016). Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tourism Management, 55, 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Firnkorn, J., & Müller, M. (2011). What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of Car2go in Ulm. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1519–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flint, D. J., & Woodruff, R. B. (2001). The initiators of changes in customers’ desired value: Results from a theory building study. Industrial Marketing Management, 30, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32, 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Funk, B., Bachmann, A., Becker, A., Buerckner, D., Hilker, M., Kock, F., Lehmann, M., & Tiburtius, P. (2011). Online peer-to-peer lending? A literature review. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16, 1–18.Google Scholar
  24. Gale, B., & Wood, R. C. (1994). Managing customer value: Creating quality and service that customers can see. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  25. Gallarza, M. G., Gil-Saura, I., & Holbrook, M. B. (2011). The value of value: Further excursions on the meaning and role of customer value. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh: Why the future of business is sharing. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 768–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guttentag, D. (2013). Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 18, 1–26.Google Scholar
  29. Guttentag, D., Smith, S., Potwarka, L., & Havitz, M. (2017). Why tourists choose Airbnb: A motivation-based segmentation study. Journal of Travel Research, 56, 1–18.Google Scholar
  30. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2047–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holbrook, M. B. (Ed.). (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media and Society, 15, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. John, N. A. (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Katzev, R. (2003). Car sharing: A new approach to urban transportation problems. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kneese, T., Rosenblat, A., & boyd, d. (2014). Understanding fair labor practices in a networked age. Data & Society Research Institute. Accessed 1 Apr 2017.
  36. Lahti, V.-M., & Selosmaa, J. (2013). A fair share: Towards a new collaborative economy. Helsinki: Atena.Google Scholar
  37. Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malhotra, A., & Van Alstyne, M. (2014). The dark side of the sharing economy and how to lighten it. Communications of the ACM, 57, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matzler, K., Veider, V., & Kathan, W. (2015). Adapting to the sharing economy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56, 71–77.Google Scholar
  41. Milanova, V., & Maas, P. (2017). Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting. Journal of Business Research, 75, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moriarty, R. T. (1983). Industrial buying behavior: Concepts, issues, and applications. Free Press. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Company.Google Scholar
  43. Owyang, J. (2016). Collaborative economy honeycomb. Accessed 30 Mar 2017.
  44. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Piscicelli, L., Cooper, T., & Fisher, T. (2015). The role of values in collaborative consumption: Insights from a product–service system for lending and borrowing in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. PwC. (2014). UK sharing economy generates 9 billion by 2025. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.
  47. PwC. (2016). Europe’s five key sharing economy sectors could deliver €570 billion by 2025. Retrieved May 5, 2017, billion-by-2025/s/45858e92-e1a7-4466-a011-a7f6b9bb488f
  48. Rintamäki, T., & Kirves, K. (2017). From perceptions to propositions: Profiling customer value across retail contexts. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rintamäki, T., Kuusela, H., & Mitronen, L. (2007). Identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing. Managing Service Quality, 17, 621–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, J., & Colgate, M. (2007). Customer value creation: A practical framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, G. E., & Nagle, T. T. (2005). A question of value. Marketing Management, 14, 38–43.Google Scholar
  53. Smolka, C., & Hienerth, C. (2014). The best of both worlds: Conceptualizing trade-offs between openness and closedness for sharing economy models. In 12th International Open and User Innovation Conference (2014), 70.Google Scholar
  54. Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousands Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Teubner, T. (2014). Thoughts on the sharing economy. Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Commerce, 11, 322–326.Google Scholar
  56. Truffer, B. (2003). User-led innovation processes: The development of professional car sharing by environmentally concerned citizens. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 16, 139–154.Google Scholar
  57. Tussyadiah, I. P. (2015). An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 2015, 817–830.Google Scholar
  58. Tussyadiah, I. P., & Zach, F. (2017). Identifying salient attributes of peer-to-peer accommodation experience. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 632–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weitzman, M. L. (1986). Macroeconomic implications of profit sharing. In NBER macroeconomics annual 1986 (Vol. 1, pp. 291–354). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yadav, M. S. (2010). The decline of conceptual articles and implications for knowledge development. Journal of Marketing, 74, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  63. Yin, R. K. (1999). Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Services Research, 34, 1209–1224.Google Scholar
  64. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hong Ngoc Nguyen
    • 1
  • Timo Rintamäki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hannu Saarijärvi
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ManagementUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations