Understanding Faith and Spirituality: The Origin, the Epistemic, and the Conduct

  • Orlando Nang Kwok Ho


When Paul authors The Epistle, helping and uplifting Roman learners and teachers in their grasp about faith and spirituality (Rom 1:11–12) obviously is on his curricular agenda. The teaching of spirituality in The Epistle is twofold. One is that the mainstream beliefs of the Greco-Roman world, unlike those of the contemporary world, recognised the fact that humans are beings with souls. Paul’s learners needed to know how the spirit might be freed or purified (cf. Rom 1:21 and 14:22). In this sense, spirituality and morality are blended. They are two sides of the same coin. The second aspect of the education is the question of what exactly is it that should be freed. Morality is more on the performance side. Spirituality is more the inward condition of the “inner human”, a term Paul uses in Rom 7:22, τὸν ἔσω ἄνθρωπον. This chapter will, on the whole, concentrate on the first aspect. Thus this chapter will focus first on a pedagogic reading Rom 4 and Rom 5. The second aspect will be dealt with in the next chapter.


  1. Apple, M. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aauconnier, F. (2008). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Beijing: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Badiou, A. (2003). St. Paul: The foundation of universalism (R. Brassier, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bongmba, E. (2014). Spirituality: An intersubjective practice. In N. Wane, F. Adyanga, & A. Ilimi (Eds.), Spiritual discourse in the academy: A globalized indigenous perspective (pp. 33–50). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, J. (1972). A history of western education, Vol. 1 – The ancient world: Orient and Mediterranean, 2000 B.C. – A. D. 1054. London: Methuen, & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Connelly, F., & Clandinin, D. (1991). Narrative inquiry: Storied experience. In E. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 12–154). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  7. Dallaire, M. (2001). Contemplation in liberation – A method for spiritual education in the schools. Lewsiton/Queenston: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  8. Devereux, D. (2003). Plato: Metaphysics. In C. Shields (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ancient philosophy (pp. 75–99). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Eisner, E. (2005). Slippery moves and blind alleys: My travels with absolutism and relativism in curriculum theory. In Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner (pp. 123–128). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A congnitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. In L. Bendixen & F. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 409–434). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, J. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching from understanding: Teacher as interpretive inquirer. New York/London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Erickson, H., & Lanning, L. (2014). Transitioning to concept-based curriculum and instruction: How to bring concept and process together. London: Corwin.Google Scholar
  13. Frankl, V. (1964). Man’s search for meaning (I. Lasch, Trans.). London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  14. Goodenough, E. (1965). The psychology of religious experience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Griffin, M. (1997). A case study of transfer of learning activities in a trainer of trainers program. Doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: UMI dissertation Services.Google Scholar
  16. Gupta, A. (2006). Experience and knowledge. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 181–204). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halstead, M. (2005). How metaphors structure our spiritual understanding. In C. Ota, & C. Erricker (Eds.), Spiritual education: Literary, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 137–153). Brighton/Portland: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hankinson, R. (2003). Academics and pyrrhonists. In C. Shields (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ancient philosophy (pp. 268–300). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Hewitt, T. (2006). Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar
  20. Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. In Cambridge, MA. London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kenny, A. (2006). A new history of western philosophy, Vol. 1, Ancient philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  22. Konstan, D. (2003). Epicureanism. In C. Shields (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ancient philosophy (pp. 237–252). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Kubli, F. (2001). Can the theory of narratives help science teachers be better storytellers? In F. Bevilacquq, E. Giannetto, & R. Matthews (Eds.), Science education and culture: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakoff, G. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Z. 李震. (1990). Xi la zhe xue shi. 希臘哲學史. Taipei: San Min.Google Scholar
  26. Loux, M. (2003). Aristotle: Metaphysics. In C. Shields (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ancient philosophy (pp. 163–183). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Luce, J. (1994). An introduction to Greek philosophy. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  28. McEvilley, T. (2002). The ethics of imperturbability. In The shape of ancient thought: Comparative studies in Greek and Indian philosophers (pp. 595–641). New York: Allworth Press.Google Scholar
  29. McNeil, J. (2015). Contemporary curriculum in thought and action. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, R. (2009). Education after the Empire. In H. Shapiro (Ed.), Education and hope in troubled times: Visions of change for our children’s world (pp. 121–133). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Mitsis, P. (2003). Stoicism. In C. Shields (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ancient philosophy (pp. 253–267). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Moilanen, P. (2002). Narrative, truth and correspondence. In R. Huttunen, H. Heikkinen, & L. Syrjälä (Eds.), Narrative research: Voices of teachers and philosophers (pp. 91–104). Jyväskylä: SoPhi.Google Scholar
  33. Muis, K., & Foy, M. (2010). The effects of teachers’ beliefs on elementary students’ beliefs, motivation, and achievement in mathematics. In L. Bendixen & F. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 435–469). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noddings, N., & Shore, P. (1984). Awakening of the inner eye: Intuition in education. New York/London: Teachers College Columbia University.Google Scholar
  35. Pachoud, B. (1999). The teleological dimension of perceptual and motor intentionality. In T. Lenior & H. Gumbrecht (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 196–219). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pascual-Leone, J., & Irwin, R. (1998). In M. Smith, & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp.35–66). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Pike, M. (2005). Reading and responding to Biblical texts: Aesthetic distance and the spiritual journey. In C. Ota, & C. Erricker (Eds.), Spiritual education: Literary, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 190–201). Brighton/Portland: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Polanyi, M. (1974). Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Schipani, D. (1984). Conscientization and creativity: Paulo Freire and Christian education. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  40. Schiro, M. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  41. Schõn, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Schunk, D. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  43. Skiffington, S., & Zeus, P. (2003). Behavioral coaching: How to build sustainable personal and organizational strength. Sydney/New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.Google Scholar
  44. Slavin, R. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  45. Smart, N. (1968). Secular education and the logic of religion. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  46. Soupios, M. (2013). The Greeks who made us who we are: Eighteen ancient philosophers, scientists, poets and others. Jefferson/London: McFarland & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Tillema, H. (2011). Looking in mirrors: Teacher educators’ dilemmas in constructing pedagogical understanding about their teaching. In J. Brownlee, G. Schraw, & D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Personal epistemology and teacher education (pp. 40–53). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Trundle, R. (1994). Ancient Greek philosophy: Its development and relevance to our time. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  49. Verbeke, G. (1991). Ethics and logic in stoicism. In M. Osler (Ed.), Atoms, pneuma, and tranquility: Epicurean and stoic themes in European thought (pp. 11–24). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Webb, E. (2009). The idea of a psychology of worldview. In Worldview and mind (pp. 1–14). Columbia/London: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wilkens, S., & Sanford, M. (2009). Hidden worldviews: Eight cultural stories that shape our lives. Downers Grove: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
  52. Windelband, W. (1993). Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). (Original work published 1912).Google Scholar
  53. Windschitl, M., Mikel, E., & Joseph, P. (2000). Reculturing curriculum. In P. Joseph et al. (Eds.), Cultures of curriculum (pp. 161–174). London/Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Wolff, H. (1951). Roman law: An historical introduction. Norman/London: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  55. Yopp, J., McAdams, K., & Thornburg, R. (2010). Reaching audiences: A guide to media writing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orlando Nang Kwok Ho
    • 1
  1. 1.The Chartered Institute of LinguistsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations