Advertisement

City as Evolving Process: Case for the Historic Urban Landscape Approach for Canberra

  • Ken TaylorEmail author
  • Meetu Sharma Saxena
Chapter
Part of the Creativity, Heritage and the City book series (CHC, volume 2)

Abstract

Canberra was conceived and planned as a city not like any other for the first 75 years of its conception from the Griffin plan of 1912 with planning guidelines specifically modelled to maintain it as the city in the landscape. Since self-government in 1988, planning has been governed increasingly by the global orthodox canon of increasing urban densification, urban consolidation and high-rise buildings without regard for the significance of the context and setting of the city. Two outcomes are low priority of heritage considerations leading to loss of heritage precincts and downplaying of the historic landscape ethos leading to loss of landscape space and trees and blocking views of the surrounding hills that are quintessential to the setting and ambience of the city. This chapter critically examines how planning action and governance for Canberra need to refocus on the essential elements of the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) approach as rapid change and transformation of the city occur.

Keywords

Landscape Civics Town planning Ideal city Authorised Planning Discourse (APD) Participatory planning Community 

References

  1. Australian Heritage Council (2012). Celebrating Canberra: A nation’s cultural and democratic landscape. exploring Canberra’s national heritage. exploring Canberra’s national heritage; Canberra, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. http://155.187.2.69/heritage/ahc/national-assessments/canberra/pubs/canberra-info-paper.pdf
  2. Bandarin, F., & van Oers, R. (2012). The historic urban landscape. Managing heritage in an urban century. Oxford/Ames: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birch, E. L. (1980). Advancing the art and science of planning. Journal of American Planning Association, 46(1), 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, N. (2014). History of Canberra. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freestone, R. (1986). Canberra as Garden City 1901-1930. Journal of Australian Studies, 19(1986), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freestone, R. (2010). Urban nation: Australia’s planning heritage. CSIRO Publishing in association with the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and the Australian Heritage Council, Collingwood, Victoria.Google Scholar
  7. Greffe, X. (2008). Urban cultural landscapes. Xavier Greffe, Griffith University, Faculty of Arts, Griffith University, Brisbane 2008. http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/100638/Greffe-Seminar1-Text.pdf
  8. Griffin, W.B. (1912). New York Times, 2 June 1912. See also Donald Leslie Johnson, (1977), The architecture of Walter Burley Griffin, (p. 20), Melbourne: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Lawson, K. (2017). Putting the LDA in the spotlight. The Canberra Times. Forum, 8/04/2017.Google Scholar
  10. McCarter, R. (2006). Frank Lloyd Wright (Critical Lives). Reaktion Publication.Google Scholar
  11. National Capital Development Commission. (1970). Tomorrow’s Canberra: Planning for growth and change. Canberra: The Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Selth, D. (2007). A brief history of Manuka Oval. of%20Manuka%20Oval.ashxGoogle Scholar
  13. Singer, J., et al. (1988). Land for the capital, Canberra a people’s capital (pp. 15–20). Canberra: Australian Institute of Urban Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor, K. (1999). Picturesque visions of a national capital: Capital city in the garden. The New Federalist. The Journal of Australian Federal History Number 3 June 1999, 74–80.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, K. (2006). Canberra: City in the landscape. Sydney: Halstead Press.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, K. (2009). Canberra as a candidate for national heritage listing. Canberra Historic Journal, 63, 38–46.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, K. (2015a). The HUL concept and cities as cultural landscapes: Canberra a missed opportunity? Australia ICOMOS Historic Environment, 27(1), 58–67.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, K. (2015b). ‘Cities as cultural landscapes’ 179–202 In F. Bandarin & R. Van Oers, Eds. (2015).Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, K. (2016). Is Lake burley griffin being sold down the river? The Canberra Times, Canberra, July 28, 2016. http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/islakeburleygriffinbeingsolddowntheriver20160727gqekdn
  21. Trobe, T. (2017). Time we had a roadmap for change. Allhomes, 17 May 2017.Google Scholar
  22. UNESCO (2011). Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape [HUL]. http://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/638.
  23. UNESCO (2016). THE HUL GUIDEBOOK managing heritage in dynamic and constantly changing urban environments, a practical guide to UNESCO’s recommendation on the historic urban landscape. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.hulballarat.org.au/resources/HUL%20Guidebook_2016_FINALWEB.pdf.
  24. Waldheim, C. (2006). Landscape as Urbanism. In The Landscape Urbanism l Reader (pp. 35–53). Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  25. Waterford, J. (2013). Blather joins city to the lake. Sunday Canberra Times, March 31 2010, p. 21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Heriatge and Museum StudiesThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Research School of Humanities and the ArtsAustralia National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations