Organic Cotton pp 141-155 | Cite as

Organic Cotton Versus Recycled Cotton Versus Sustainable Cotton

  • P. Senthil KumarEmail author
  • A. Saravanan
Part of the Textile Science and Clothing Technology book series (TSCT)


Organic cotton will be cotton that is relied upon to have been developed without manures and pesticides, with rehearses that advance biodiversity, organic cycles, and soil health. As far as natural cotton, China, Turkey, and India are the world’s driving makers and sources. While natural cotton makes cotton development “cleaner,” both natural and ordinary cotton experience a similar assembling process, which is water and vitality concentrated. Recycled cotton is re-purposed, post-modern or post-shopper cotton that would somehow or another is considered straight up: squander for the landfill. The pieces of such cut and sew offices are post-mechanical cotton “squander” that have the ability to be reused. Contingent upon how reused cotton is utilized, it can possibly extraordinarily decrease water and vitality utilization in reasonable design and attire, and diminish landfill waste and space. Cotton development is related with various social, financial and natural difficulties that debilitate the part’s sustainability. Development of more reasonable cotton has never been higher than it is today, achieving 2.6 million tons in 2015/16, around 12% of aggregate worldwide supply. Nonetheless, just barely finished a fifth (21%) of this sum is effectively sourced as more sustainable cotton by organizations with the rest of as customary cotton.


Organic cotton Biodiversity Landfill Recycling Sustainable 


  1. 1.
    Babu KM, Selvadass M (2013) Life cycle assessment for the dyeing and finishing process of organic cotton knitted fabrics. J Text Apparel Technol Manage 8:1–16Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica FM, Mazzuto G, Paciarotti C (2014) Environmental analysis of a cotton yarn supply chain. J Clean Prod 82:154–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen L, Wang B, Ruan X, Chen J, Yang Y (2015) Hydrolysis-free and fully recyclable reactive dyeing of cotton in green, non-nucleophilic solvents for a sustainable textile industry. J Clean Prod 107:550–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collier BJ, Collier JR, Petrovan S, Negulescu II (2007) Recycling of cotton. Cotton 15:484–500Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durham E, Hewitt A, Bell R, Russell S (2015) Technical design for recycling of clothing. Sustain Apparel 7:187–198Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esteve-Turrillas FA, Guardia MDL (2017) Environmental impact of recover cotton in textile industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 116:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halimi MT, Hassen MB, Sakli F (2008) Cotton waste recycling: quantitative and qualitative assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(5):785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson GJ (2005) Organic cotton farming in Kutch. Agrocel, Gujarat, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khor LY, Feike T (2017) Economic sustainability of irrigation practices in arid cotton production. Water Resour Econ 20:40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krishna VV, Qaim M (2012) Bt cotton and sustainability of pesticide reductions in India. Agric Syst 107:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leifeld F (1996) Cotton waste reclamation. Recycl Text Plast Waste, 107–119Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Radhakrishnan S (2017) Sustainable cotton production. Sustain Fibres Text 2:21–67Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rajput D, Bhagade SS, Raut SP, Ralegaonkar RV, Mandavgane SA (2012) Reuse of cotton and recycle paper mill waste as building material. Construct Build Mater 34:470–475Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rana S, Karunamoorthy S, Parveen S, Fangueiro R (2015) Life cycle assessment of cotton textiles and clothing. Handb Life Cycle Assess (LCA) Text Clothing 9:195–216Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vigneswaran C, Ananthasubramanian M, Kandhavadivu P (2014) Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles. Bioprocess Text 7:319–397Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wakelyn PJ, Chaudhry MR (2007) Organic cotton. Cotton 5:130–175Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wossink A, Denaux ZS (2006) Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production. Agric Syst 90(1–3):312–328Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zulfiqar F, Thapa GB (2016) Is ‘better cotton’ better than conventional cotton in terms of input use efficiency and financial performance? Land Use Pol 52:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringSSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyRajalakshmi Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations