Improving Student Interest Through Games in Architecture History Using Constructivism
In order to improve students’ interest in history classes, a pilot experimental module of producing and playing board games was conducted on 52 fourth-semester architecture students. This paper outlines students’ perceptions of the experimental module. The arguments are based on the learning theory of constructivism, which had been discussed to develop collaboration, promote engagement in class, and create critical thinking process. Investigation of the module’s perception from students was made through observations, questionnaire surveys, and in-depth interviews. The results showed that students create and appreciate collaborations between their peers. Students are seen more active and engaged in the subject even in their free time, and they had developed a creative synthesis in their task by applying the course content in their board game productions. The study hopes research can be extended to other levels of semesters and conduct the experimental module to other subjects than history.
KeywordsArchitecture student History Constructivism Board game
This work is partially supported by Universiti Teknologi MARA in allowing demonstration of the module and research. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved the presentation.
- Bi, T., & Yang, W. (2011). Modern learning theory and u-learning studies. In Proceeding of the international conference on e-education entertainment and e-management, ICEEE 2011 (pp. 239–242). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeEEM.2011.6137795.
- Bryant, L. C., Vincent, R., Shaqlaih, A., & Moss, G. (2013). Behaviorism and behavioral learning theory. In The handbook of educational theories (pp. 91–103). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2013-11995-008&site=ehost-live%5Cnhttp://email@example.com.Google Scholar
- Critical thinking. (2014, August 26). In S. Abbott (Ed.), The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/critical-thinking.
- Head, G. (2003). Effective collaboration: Deep collaboration as an essential element of the learning process. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4, 47–62.Google Scholar
- Jones, M. G., & Araje, L. B. (2002). The impact of constructivism in education. Discourse and Maeaning. American Communication Journal, 5(3), 1–10 Retrieved from http://ac-journal.org/journal/vol5/iss3/special/jones.pdf.Google Scholar
- Koster, R. (2005). Theory of fun for game design. A theory of fun for game design 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
- McLeod, S. (2012). Jean Piaget cognitive theory simply psychology. Simply psychology. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html.
- Siemens, G. (2014). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1, 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1.1.87.3793.Google Scholar
- Sjøberg, S. (2010). Constructivism and learning. In International encyclopedia of education (pp. 485–490). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00467-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Student engagement. (2014). In S. Abbott (Ed.), The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/student-engagement.
- Watson, J. B. (2013). Behaviorism. Worcestershire: Read Books Ltd.Google Scholar