Advertisement

Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Intention Among Academic Staff

  • Rozihana Shekh ZainEmail author
  • Sharifah Khairol Musairah Syed Abdul Mutalib
  • Nurhidayah Dzulkafli
  • Afiqah Syahirah Noor Aziz
  • Nor Anati Rosli
  • Fatin Hanani Yusuf
  • Hanisah Tajul Abidin
Conference paper

Abstract

The objective of this research is to study the predictors that affect knowledge sharing intention among academic staff in public higher education institutions. A total of 120 questionnaires were distributed among academic staff at 4 public higher education institutions in Malaysia. Collectively, 97 usable responses were returned. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the data. The finding indicated that attitude, subjective norm, and self-efficacy were positively and significantly related to knowledge sharing intention. Future research should consider the type of knowledge that is being shared. In addition, it would also be interesting to compare public and private universities in terms of knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. This chapter gives a clear explanation of the predictors that determine the knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. Thus, top management can implement a practical plan to support those determinants.

Keywords

Knowledge sharing intention Attitude Subjective norm Self-efficacy 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (Vol. 278). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall https://doi.org/Z.Google Scholar
  3. Argote, L. (2013). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5251-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729–735 Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WYC-46X47RS-6/2/c0a1cd79add2764aa5d7cd99e599bd78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117 Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=6412974&site=ehost-live.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartol, K., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organisational Studies, 19(1), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock, G., & Kim, Y. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15, 14–21.  https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2002040102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2005a). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bock, G.-W. G. W., Zmud, R. W. R. W., Kim, Y.-G. Y. G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005b). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.  https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jolaee, A., Nor, K. M., Khani, N., & Yusoff, R. M. (2014). Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(August 2016), 413–431.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2013-0041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B., & Wei, K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113–143 https://doi.org/Article.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 370–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kong, S. C., & Kwok, L. F. (1999). Conceptual model of knowledge-based time-tabling system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 12(3), 81–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(98)00090-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lesser, E. L., & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 831–841.  https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.404.0831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu, L., Leung, K., & Koch, P. T. (2006). Managerial knowledge sharing: The role of individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 15–41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00029.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Musairah, S. K. (2013). Towards a theory of self-leadership and individual characteristics: Understanding the impact of situational factors. Perth: University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. In Step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program, 2007. Retrieved from http://solo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?dscnt=1&vl(drStartDay6)=00&vl(60606418UI3)=all_items&scp.scps=scope:(OULS),scope:(NET)&tab=local&srt=rank&mode=Advanced&vl(1UIStartWith1)=contains&tb=t&indx=1&vl(drEndYear6)=Year&vl(freeT.
  22. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. So, J. C. F., & Bolloju, N. (2005). Explaining the intentions to share and reuse knowledge in the context of IT service operations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 30–41.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510629945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practices. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yih-Tong Sun, P., & Scott, J. L. (2005). An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 75–90.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510590236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rozihana Shekh Zain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharifah Khairol Musairah Syed Abdul Mutalib
    • 1
  • Nurhidayah Dzulkafli
    • 1
  • Afiqah Syahirah Noor Aziz
    • 1
  • Nor Anati Rosli
    • 1
  • Fatin Hanani Yusuf
    • 1
  • Hanisah Tajul Abidin
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan PerlisArauMalaysia

Personalised recommendations