Advertisement

Toxicity, Beneficial Aspects and Treatment of Alcohol Industry Wastewater

  • Pankaj Chowdhary
  • Ram Naresh Bharagava
Chapter

Abstract

The alcohol industry is one of the most popular among all industries and a key contributor in the world’s economic growth, but unfortunately, these industries are also considered one of the major sources of environmental pollution. Alcohol industry wastewater is highly toxic for the aquatic and the terrestrial eco-system. This wastewater contains a high concentration of biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total solids, organic matter, potassium and sulphates and high acidic characteristics. Because of the high content of a toxic nature, it causes an adverse impact on soil structure and water bodies in the case of excessive amounts. In aquatic resources, it reduces the penetration power of sunlight causing a reduction in the photosynthetic activity of aquatic plants, dissolved oxygen content in water bodies and in terrestrial regions, and it causes genotoxic and phytotoxic effects on animal and plants respectively. Additionally, this wastewater may be used for the ferti-irrigation after proper dilution. In this chapter, we discuss in detail the positive and negative aspects of alcohol wastewater and miscellaneous treatment technologies for wastewater treatment. The aim of this chapter is also to provide updated information on the alternative uses of alcohol wastewater, such as energy production, ferti-irrigation, and other value-added products.

Keywords

Alcohol industry Environmental pollution Toxicity Genotoxicity Energy production 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship (Letter No. RGNF 2015-17SC-UTT-20334) awarded to Mr. Pankaj Chowdhary for Ph.D. work from the University Grant Commission (UGC), Government of India (GOI), New Delhi, is duly acknowledged.

References

  1. Agarwal R, Lata S, Gupta M, Singh P (2010) Removal of melanoidin present in distillery effluent as a major colorant: a review. J Environ Biol 31:521–528Google Scholar
  2. Ale R, Jha PK, Belbase N (2008) Effects of distillery effluent on some agricultural crops: a case of environmental injustice to local farmers in Khajura VDC. Banke Sci World 6:68–75Google Scholar
  3. Apollo S, Onyango MS, Ochieng A (2013) An integrated anaerobic digestion and UV photocatalytic treatment of distillery wastewater. J Hazard Mater 261(15):435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arimi MM, Zhang Y, Götz G, Geißen SU (2015) Treatment of melanoidin wastewater by anaerobic digestion and coagulation. Environ Technol 36(19):2410–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bharagava RN, Chandra R (2010a) Biodegradation of the major color containing compounds in distillery wastewater by an aerobic bacterial culture and characterization of their metabolites. Biodegradation 21:703–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharagava RN, Chandra R (2010b) Effect of bacteria treated and untreated post-methanated distillery effluent (PMDE) on seed germination, seedling growth and amylase activity in Phaseolus mungo L. J Hazard Mater 180:730–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bharagava RN, Chandra R, Rai V (2009) Isolation and characterization of aerobic bacteria capable of the degradation of synthetic and natural melanoidins from distillery effluent world. J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bharagava RN, Chowdhary P, Saxena G (2017) Bioremediation an eco-sustainable green technology, its applications and limitations. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botelho RG, Tornisielo VL, Olinda RA, Maranho LA, Machado-Neto L (2012) Acute toxicity of sugarcane vinasse to aquatic organisms before and after pH adjustment. Toxicol Environ Chem 94:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camargo JA, Pereira N, Cabello PR, Teran FJC (2009) Viabilidade da aplicação do método respirométrico de Bartha para a análise da atividade microbiana de solos sob a aplicação de vinhaça. Engenharia Ambient 6:264–271Google Scholar
  11. Carmo JB, Filoso S, Zotelli LC, De Sousa Neto ER, Pitombo LM, Duarte-Neto PJ, Vargas VP, Andrade CA, Gava GJC, Rossetto R, Cantarella H, Neto AE, Martinelli LA (2012) Infield greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane soils in Brazil: effects from synthetic and organic fertilizer application and crop trash accumulation. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 5:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandra R, Pandey PK (2001) Decolourisation of anaerobically treated distillery effluent by activated charcoal adsorption method Ind J Environ Prot 2: 132–134Google Scholar
  13. Chandra R, Chowdhary P (2015) Properties of bacterial laccases and their application in bioremediation of industrial wastes. Environ Sci: Processes Impacts 17:326–342Google Scholar
  14. Chen B, Tian X, Yu L, Wu Z (2016) Removal of pigments from molasses wastewater by combining micro-electrolysis with biological treatment method. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39:1867–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chowdhary P, Raj A, Bharagava RN (2018) Environmental pollution and health hazards from distillery wastewater and treatment approaches to combat the environmental threats: a review. Chemosphere 194:229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chowdhary P, Yadav A, Kaithwas G, Bharagava RN (2017) Distillery wastewater: a major source of environmental pollution and its biological treatment for environmental safety. In: Singh R, Kumar S (eds) Green technologies and environmental sustainability. Springer International, Cham, pp 409–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christofoletti CA, Escher JP, Correia JE, Marinho JFU, Fontanetti CS (2013a) Sugarcane vinasse: environmental implications of its use. Waste Manag 33:2752–2761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christofoletti CA, Pedro-Escher J, Fontanetti CS (2013b) Assessment of the genotoxicity of two agricultural residues after processing by diplopods using the Allium cepa assay. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1523–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corazza RI (1996) Reflexões sobre o papel das políticas ambientais e de ciência etecnologia na modelagem de opções produtivas ‘mais limpas’ numa perspective evolucionista: um estudo sobre disposição da vinhaça. 163f. Tese de Doutorado. Departamento de política cientifica e tecnológica. Instituto de Geociências, da Unicamp, Campinas-SP.Google Scholar
  20. Cortez LAB, Silva A, de Lucas JJ, Jordan RA, de Castro LR (2007) Biodigestão de Efluentes. In: Cortez LAB, Lora ES (eds) Biomassa para Energia. Editora da UNICAMP, Campinas, pp 493–529Google Scholar
  21. David C, Arivazhagan M, Balamurali MN, Shanmugarajan D (2015) Decolorization of distillery spent wash using biopolymer synthesized by Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from tannery effluent. BioMed Res Int, 2015:9 pagesGoogle Scholar
  22. Doke KM, Khan EM, Rapolu J, Shaikh A (2011) Physico-chemical analysis of sugar industry effluent and its effect on seed germination of Vigna angularis, Vigna cylindrical and Sorghum cernum. Ann Environ Sci 5:7–11Google Scholar
  23. El-Dib FI, Tawfik FM, Eshaq G, Hefni HHH, ElMetwally AE (2016) Remediation of distilleries wastewater using chitosan immobilized bentonite and bentonite based organoclays. Int J Biol Macromol 86:750–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farshi R, Priya S, Saidutta MB (2013) Reduction of colour and COD of an aerobically treated distillery wastewater by electrochemical method. Int J Curr Eng Technol 168–171Google Scholar
  25. Feng Y, Wang X, Logan BE, Lee H (2008) Brewery wastewater treatment using air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78:873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fountoulakis MS, Manios T (2009) Enhanced methane and hydrogen production from municipal solid waste and agro-industrial by-products co-digested with crude glycerol. Bioresour Technol 100(12):3043–3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freire WJ, Cortez LA (2000) Vinhaça de cana-de-açúcar. Agropecuária, GuaíbaGoogle Scholar
  28. Fuess LT, Garcia ML (2014) Implications of stillage land disposal: a critical review on the impacts of fertigation. J Environ Manag 145:210–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Georgiou RP, Tsiakiri EP, Lazaridis NK, Pantazaki AA (2016) Decolorization of melanoidins from simulated and industrial molasses effluents by immobilized laccase. J Environ Chem Eng 4:1322–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gianchini CF, Ferraz MV (2009) Benefícios da utilização de vinhaça em terras de plantio de cana-de-açúcar-Revisão de Literatura. Rev Cient Eletrônica Agron 15Google Scholar
  31. Harrison B, Fagnen O, Jack F, Brosnan J (2011) The impact of copper in different parts of malt whisky pot stills on new make spirit composition and aroma. J Inst Brew 117:106–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kannan A, Upreti RK (2008) Influence of distillery effluent on germination and growth of mung bean (Vigna radiata) seeds. J Hazard Mater 153:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaushik G, Thakur IS (2009) Isolation and characterization of distillery spent wash color reducing bacteria and process optimization by Taguchi approach. Int Biodeter Biodegr 63:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kharayat Y (2012) Distillery wastewater: bioremediation approaches. J Integr Environ Sci 9:69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krzywonos M, Chałupniak A, Zabochnicka-Świątek M (2017) Decolorization of beet molasses vinasse by Bacillus megaterium ATCC 14581. Biorem J 21(2):81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laime EMO, Fernandes PD, Oliveira DCS, Freire EA (2011) Possibilidades tecnológicas para a destinação da vinhaça: uma revisão. Rev Trop Ci Agric Biol 5:16–29Google Scholar
  37. Lalov IG, Guerginov II, Krysteva A, Fartsov K (2000) Treatment of wastewater from distilleries with chitosan. Water Res 34:1503–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liakos TI, Lazaridis NK (2014) Melanoidins removal from simulated and real wastewaters by coagulation and electro-flotation. Chem Eng J 242:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ludovice MTF (1997) Estudo do efeito poluente da vinhaça infiltrada em canal condutor de terra sobre o lençol freático. 143 p. Dissertação. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil. UNICAMP, Campinas. Available at http://libdigi.unicamp.br/document/?code=vtls000124559. Accessed 10 May 2011
  40. Mall ID (1995) Waste utilization and management in sugar and distillery plants. Chem Eng World XXX(1):51–60Google Scholar
  41. Mishra P, Roy S, Das D (2015) Comparative evaluation of the hydrogen production by mixed consortium, synthetic co-culture and pure culture using distillery effluent. Bioresour Technol 198:593–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Modak P (2011) Waste. Investing in energy and resource efficiency. To war. a green Econ Environ. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/GER_8_Waste.pdf
  43. Navarro AR, Sepúlveda MC, Rubio MC (2000) Bio-concentration of vinasse from the alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses. Waste Manag 20:581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nure JF, Shibeshi NT, Asfaw SL, Audenaert W, Hulle SWHV (2017) COD and colour removal from molasses spent wash using activated carbon produced from bagasse fly ash of Matahara sugar factory, Oromiya region, Ethiopia. Water SA 43(3):470–479.  https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v43i3.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oliveira BG, Carvalho JLN, Cerri CEP, Cerri CC, Feigl BJ (2013) Soil greenhouse gas fluxes from vinasse application in Brazilian sugarcane areas. Geoderma 200–201:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pandey RA, Malhotra S, Tankhiwale A, Pande S, Pathe PP, Kaul SN (2003) Treatment of biologically treated distillery effluent- a case study. Int J Environ Stud 60:263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pandey SN, Nautiyal BD, Sharma CP (2008) Pollution level in distillery effluent and its phytotoxic effect on seed germination and early growth of maize and rice. J Environ Biol 29:267–270Google Scholar
  48. Pedrosa EMR, Rolim MM, Albuquerque PHS, Cunha AC (2005) Supressividade de nematóides em cana-de-açúcar por adição de vinhaça ao solo. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 9:197–201Google Scholar
  49. Ramana A, Biswas AK, Kundu S, Saha JK, Yadava RBR (2002) Effect of distillery effluent on seed germination in some vegetable crops. Bioresour Technol 82:273–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rath P, Pradhan G, Mishra MK (2010) Effect of sugar factory distillery spent wash (DSW) on the growth pattern of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) crop. J Phytol 2(5):33–39Google Scholar
  51. Samsudeen N, Radhakrishnan TK, Matheswaran M (2015) Bioelectricity production from microbial fuel cell using mixed bacterial culture isolated from distillery wastewater. Bioresour Technol 195:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sankaran K, Premalatha M, Vijayasekaran M, Somasundaram VT (2014) DEPHY project: distillery wastewater treatment through anaerobic digestion and phycoremediation – a green industrial approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 37:634–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Santal AR, Singh NP, Saharan BS (2016) A novel application of Paracoccus pantotrophus for the decolorization of melanoidins from distillery effluent under static conditions. J Environ Manag 169:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Santana VS, Machado NRCF (2008) Photocatalytic degradation of the vinasse under solar radiation. Catal Today 133:606–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2007) Removal of color from biomethanated distillery spentwash by treatment with activated carbons. Bioresour Technol 98:2629–2635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2008) Wastewater treatment in molasses-based alcohol distilleries for COD and color removal: a review. J Environ Manag 86:481–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singh M, Chauhan Dikshit AK (2012) Indian distillery industry: problems and prospects of decolourisation of spentwash. International Conference on Future Environment and Energy IPCBEE vol. 28(2012) © (2012) IACSIT Press, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  58. Sirianuntapiboon S, Phothilangka P, Ohmomo S (2004) Decolourization of molasses wastewater by a strain no. BP103 of acetogenic bacteria. Bioresour Technol 92:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Souza TS, Hencklein FA, De Angelis DF, Fontanetti CS (2013) Clastogenicity of landfarming soil treated with sugar cane vinasse. Environ Monit Assess 185:1627–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Srivastava S, Jain R (2010) Effect of distillery spent wash on cytomorphological behaviour of sugarcane settlings. J Environ Biol 31:809–812Google Scholar
  61. Srivastava PC, Singh RK, Srivastava P, Shrivastava M (2012) Utilization of molasses based distillery effluent for fertigation of sugarcane. Biodegradation 23:897–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Szymanski MSE, Balbinot R, Schirmer WN (2010) Biodigestão anaeróbica da vinhaça: aproveitamento energético do biogás e obtenção de créditos de carbono – estudo de caso. Semin Ciênc Agrár 31:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tolmasquim MT (2008) Bioenergy for the future. In: Conference on biofuels: an option for a less carbon-intensive economy (4th–5th December, 2007) [cited 14 April 2008]. Available from Internet: http://www.unctad.org/sections/wcmu/docs/uxii_ditc_tedb_013_en.pdf
  64. Von Sperling M (2005) Introdução à qualidade das águas e ao tratamento de esgotos. Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo HorizonteGoogle Scholar
  65. Waal A, Jiménez-Rueda JR, Bonotto DM, Bertelli C, Hoffmann HM, Fobhag E, Santilli M (2009) Influence of the vinasse application in sugar cane fields in Patrocínio Paulista, São Paulo State, Brazil. In: Brebia CA (ed) Environmental health risk V. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 113–124Google Scholar
  66. Wang H, Zhao Y (2009) A bench scale study of fermentative hydrogen and methane production from food waste in integrated two-stage process. Int J Hydrog Energy 34(1):245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wen Q, Wu Y, Zhao L, Sun Q (2010) Production of electricity from the treatment of continuous brewery wastewater using a microbial fuel cell. Fuel 89:1381–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yesilada E (1999) Genotoxic activity of vinasse and its effect on fecundity and longevity of Drosophila melanogaster. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 63:560–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang M, Wang Z, Li P, Zhang H, Li X (2017) Bio-refractory dissolved organic matter and colorants in cassava distillery wastewater: characterization, coagulation treatment and mechanisms. Chemosphere 178:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pankaj Chowdhary
    • 1
  • Ram Naresh Bharagava
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Bioremediation and Metagenomics Research (LBMR), Department of Environmental Microbiology (DEM)Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University)LucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations