Advertisement

Phycotechnological Approaches Toward Wastewater Management

  • Atul Kumar Upadhyay
  • Ranjan Singh
  • D. P. Singh
Chapter

Abstract

Phycoremediation technology is a cost-effective and environment-friendly approach, which involves use of microalgae to suck the pollutant present in the soil and water. The accumulation of inorganic and organic pollutants like pesticides, herbicides, insecticide, PCBs, DDT, and metals along with metalloids (Cd, Pb, Se, As) in the aquatic ecosystem can cause deleterious impacts on environment and organisms. Natural and intensive anthropogenic activities are the main factor responsible for the accumulation of these pollutants in plants and animals. These serious problems of pollution can be resolved by the application of phycoremediation technologies using microalgae to remove pollutants from the environment in a sustainable manner. The present chapter focuses on the different techniques used in remediation of pollutants and the mechanism of remediation adopted by micro- and macroalgal species to absorb the organic and inorganic pollutants from wastewater and soil.

Keywords

Phycoremediation Microalgae Wastewater Pollutant 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to Vice-chancellor, BBA University, Lucknow, for providing facilities. Dr. AKU is also thankful to the Science and Engineering Recruitment Board, New Delhi (Project No. PDF/2016/002432/LS) for providing financial support.

References

  1. Agard J, Angela C, Aquing P, Attzs M, Arias F, Beltran J, Creary M (2007) Caribbean Sea ecosystem assessment. Caribb Mar Stud 8:1–85Google Scholar
  2. Alahuhta J, Joensuu I, Matero J, Vuori K M, Saastamoinen O (2013) Freshwater ecosystem services in FinlandGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrington MJ, Watts SA, Gledhill SR, Thomas RD, Said SA, Snyder GL, Jamrozik K (2009) Preliminary results of the Australasian Regional Anaesthesia Collaboration: a prospective audit of more than 7000 peripheral nerve and plexus blocks for neurologic and other complications. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:534–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaylock MJ, Salt DE, Dushenkov S, Zakharova O, Gussman C, Kapulnik Y, Ensley BD, Raskin I (1997) Enhanced accumulation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil-applied chelating agents. Environ Sci Technol 31:860–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bursali EA, Cavas L, Seki Y, Bozkurt SS, Yurdakoc M (2009) Sorption of boron by invasive marine seaweed: Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea. Chem Eng J 150:385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bwapwa JK, Jaiyeola AT, Chetty R (2017) Bioremediation of acid mine drainage using algae strains: a review. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering 24:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai T, Park SY, Li Y (2013) Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: status and prospects. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 19:360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrasco Gil S, Siebner H, Le Duc DL, Webb SM, Millán R, Andrews JC, Hernández LE (2013) Mercury localization and speciation in plants grown hydroponically or in a natural environment. Environ Sci Technol 47:3082–3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaney RL, Malik M, Li YM, Brown SL, Brewer EP, Angle JS, Baker AJ (1997) Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen S, Wilson DB (1997) Construction and characterization of Escherichia coli genetically engineered for bioremediation of Hg (2+)-contaminated environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2442–2445Google Scholar
  11. Chinnasamy S, Rao PH, Bhaskar S, Rengasamy R, Singh M (2012) Algae: a novel biomass feedstock for biofuels. Micro biotechnology: energy and environment. CABI, Wallingford, pp 224–239Google Scholar
  12. Choi HJ, Lee SM (2015) Effect of the N/P ratio on biomass productivity and nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 38(4):761–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2004) Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997–2003). Water Res 38:4222–4246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Paula Silva PH, McBride S, de Nys R, Paul NA (2008) Integrating filamentous ‘green tide’algae into tropical pond-based aquaculture. Aquaculture 284:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emmett RS, Nye DE (2017) The environmental humanities: a critical introduction. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Garbisu C, Alkorta I (2001) Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour Technol 77:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grist NR (1981) Hepatitis and other infections in clinical laboratory staff, 1979. J Clin Pathol 34:655–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta C, Prakash D, Gupta S (2018) Microbes: a tribute to clean environment. Paradigms in pollution prevention. Springer, Cham, pp 17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han L, Pei H, Hu W, Jiang L, Ma G, Zhang S, Han F (2015) Integrated campus sewage treatment and biomass production by Scenedesmus quadricauda SDEC-13. Bioresour Technol 175:262–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper M (2000) Sorbent trapping of volatile organic compounds from air. J Chromatogr A 885:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hua Y, Heal KV, Friesl Hanl W (2017) The use of red mud as an immobiliser for metal/metalloid-contaminated soil: a review. J Hazard Mater 325:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kayser A, Wenger K, Keller A, Attinger W, Felix HR, Gupta SK, Schulin R (2000) Enhancement of phytoextraction of Zn, Cd, and Cu from calcareous soil: the use of NTA and sulfur amendments. Environ Sci Technol 34:1778–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller C, Ludwig C, Davoli F, Wochele J (2005) Thermal treatment of metal-enriched biomass produced from heavy metal phytoextraction. Environ Sci Technol 39:3359–3367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirst H, Gabilly ST, Niyogi KK, Lemaux PG, Melis A (2017) Photosynthetic antenna engineering to improve crop yields. Planta 245:1009–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumpiene J, Guerri G, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Nannipieri P, Renella G (2009) Microbial biomass, respiration and enzyme activities after in situ aided phytostabilization of a Pb-and Cu-contaminated soil. Eco Env Saf 72:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lincoln EP, Wilkie AC, French BT (1996) Cyanobacterial process for renovating dairy wastewater. Biomass Bioenergy 10:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Rybak MJ (2011) Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52:18–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013) Euglena sp. as a suitable source of lipids for potential use as biofuel and sustainable wastewater treatment. J Appl Phycol 25:855–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malik A (2004) Metal bioremediation through growing cells. Env Intern 30:261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martinez ME, Jimenez JM, El Yousfi F (1999) Influence of phosphorus concentration and temperature on growth and phosphorus uptake by the microalga Scenedesmus obliquus. Bioresour Technol 67:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matagi SV, Swai D, Mugabe R (1998) A review of heavy metal removal mechanisms in wetlands. Afr J Trop Hydrobiol Fish 8:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGinn PJ, Dickinson KE, Bhatti S, Frigon JC, Guiot SR, O’Leary SJ (2011) Integration of microalgae cultivation with industrial waste remediation for biofuel and bioenergy production: opportunities and limitations. Photosynth Res 109:231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGrath SP, Zhao FJ (2003) Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Current Opinion Biotech 14:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Megharaj M, Avudainayagam S, Naidu R (2003) Toxicity of hexavalent chromium and its reduction by bacteria isolated from soil contaminated with tannery waste. Curr Microbiol 47:51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Menon V, Rao M (2012) Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:522–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mishra S, Tripathi RD, Srivastava S, Dwivedi S, Trivedi PK, Dhankher OP, Khare A (2009) Thiol metabolism play significant role during cadmium detoxification by Ceratophyllum demersum L. Bioresour Technol 100:2155–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, Halling C, Shpigel M, Yarish C (2004) Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231:361–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nigam PS, Singh A (2011) Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog Energy Combust Sci 37:52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oswald W, Gotass H (1957) Conversion of solar energy to electricity via algae growth. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers (United States)Google Scholar
  40. Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY (2007) Phytoremediation technology: hyper-accumulation metals in plants. Water Air Soil Pollut 184:105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Palmer CM (1974) Algae in American sewage stabilization’s ponds. Rev Microbiol (S-Paulo) 5: 75–80Google Scholar
  42. Pham DT, Everaert G, Janssens N, Alvarado A, Nopens I, Goethals PL (2014) Algal community analysis in a waste stabilisation pond. Ecol Eng 73:302–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pittman JK, Dean AP, Osundeko O (2011) The potential of sustainable algal biofuel production using wastewater resources. Bioresour Technol 102:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rao AM, Charette MA (2011) Benthic nitrogen fixation in an eutrophic estuary affected by groundwater discharge. J Coast Res 28:477–485Google Scholar
  45. Rascio N, Navari-Izzo F (2011) Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it and what makes them so interesting. Plant Sci 180:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raskin I, Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov S, Salt DE (1994) Bioconcentration of heavy metals by plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 5:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rath B (2012) Microalgal bioremediation: current practices and perspectives. J Biochem Technol 3:299–304Google Scholar
  48. Robinson BH, Bañuelos G, Conesa HM, Evangelou MW, Schulin R (2009) The phytomanagement of trace elements in soil. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:240–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar NP, Dushenkov V, Ensley BD, Chet I, Raskin I (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Nat Biotechnol 13:468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shamsuddoha ASM, Bulbul A, Huq SMI (2006) Accumulation of arsenic in green algae and its subsequent transfer to the soil–plant system. Bangladesh J Microbiol 22:148–151Google Scholar
  51. Singh NK, Upadhyay AK, Rai UN (2017) Algal technologies for wastewater treatment and biofuels production: an integrated approach for environmental management. Algal biofuels. Springer, Cham, pp 97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Staicu LC, Barton LL (2017) Bacterial metabolism of selenium – for survival or profit. Bioremediation of selenium contaminated wastewater. Springer, Cham, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  53. Stauch WK, Srinivasan VN, Kuo Dahab WC, Park C, Butler CS (2017) The role of inorganic nitrogen in successful formation of granular biofilms for wastewater treatment that support cyanobacteria and bacteria. AMB Express 7:146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stevenson LM, Adeleye AS, Su Y, Zhang Y, Keller AA, Nisbet RM (2017) Remediation of cadmium toxicity by sulfidized nano-iron: the importance of organic material. ACS Nano 11:10558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Talbot P, De la Noüe J (1993) Tertiary treatment of wastewater with Phormidium bohneri (Schmidle) under various light and temperature conditions. Water Res 27:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ul Hassan Z, Ali S, Rizwan M, Ibrahim M, Nafees M, Waseem M (2017) Role of bioremediation agents (bacteria, fungi, and algae) in alleviating heavy metal toxicity. Probiotics in agroecosystem. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 517–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Singh R, Rai UN (2016) Amelioration of arsenic toxicity in rice: comparative effect of inoculation of Chlorella vulgaris and Nannochloropsis sp. on growth, biochemical changes and arsenic uptake. Eco Environ Saf 124:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang WC, Freemark K (1995) The use of plants for environmental monitoring and assessment. Eco Environ Saf 30:289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wu LF, Chen PC, Huang AP, Lee CM (2012) The feasibility of biodiesel production by microalgae using industrial wastewater. Bioresour Technol 113:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xue HB, Stumm W, Sigg L (1988) The binding of heavy metals to algal surfaces. Water Res 22:917–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yavuzcan YH, Robaina L, Pirhonen J, Mente E, Domínguez D, Parisi G (2017) Fish welfare in Aquaponic systems: its relation to water quality with an emphasis on feed and Faeces a review. Water 9:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atul Kumar Upadhyay
    • 1
  • Ranjan Singh
    • 1
  • D. P. Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental ScienceBabasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Central UniversityLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations