New Tools and Techniques for Measuring Sustainability in Clothing

Chapter
Part of the Textile Science and Clothing Technology book series (TSCT)

Abstract

Textile industry is one of the fundamental ventures which fulfills one of the essential needs of individuals and subsequently moves toward becoming as an unavoidable piece of human’s life. Measuring sustainability in textile industry is a complex examination technique. It is directed for supporting basic leadership and strategy in an expansive ecological, monetary, and social setting. The research on sustainability measurement flourishes with various tools, techniques, models, and systems, and the measure of writing on sustainability evaluation connected to the field of assembling is quickly developing. Environmental, social, and monetary effects are significant mainstays of sustainability in textile industry. Measuring sustainability has been viewed as troublesome because of the subjective idea of the deliberate issues. Higg Index has turned out to be a far-reaching self-measuring tool for associations in the clothing sector to utilize. Picking a correct tool to suit the requirements of various players in the field of sustainability is particularly pivotal. Sustainability can be evaluated for a product, venture, and furthermore for an area and a nation. Measuring tools are characterized by different ways. Not all sustainability measuring tools can be utilized for textile network, and a portion of the tools are very apparent to survey the sustainability of textile outcomes.

Keywords

Sustainability Tools and techniques Environmental Economic and social supportability Lifecycle assessment Sustainable Apparel Coalition Higg Index 

References

  1. 1.
    Baumgartner S, Quaas M (2010) What is sustainability economics? Ecol Econ 69:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belz F-M, Peattie K (2012) Sustainability marketing: a global perspective, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Binder CR, Feola G, Steinberger JK (2010) Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environ Impact Assess Rev 30:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bostrom M, Micheletti M (2016) Introducing the sustainability challenge of textiles and clothing. J Consum Policy 39:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen Hsiou-Lien, Burns LD (2006) Environmental analysis of textile products. Cloth Text Res J 24:248–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Ridder W, Turnpenny J, Nilsson M, von Raggamby A (2007) A framework for tool selection and use in integrated assessment for sustainable development. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 9:423–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.P.A. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and practice. Tech. Rep. EPA/600/R-06/060, National Risk Management LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gasparatos A (2010) Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications. J Environ Manage 91:1613–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giampietro M, Mayumi K, Bukkens SGF (2001) Multiple-scale integrated assessment of societal metabolism: an analytical tool to measure development and sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 3:275–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hasna AM (2008) A review of sustainability assessment methods in engineering. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 5(1):161–176Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poveda CA, Lipsett MG (2011) A review of sustainability assessment and sustainability/environmental rating systems and credit weighting tools. J Sustain Dev 4:36–55Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarzynski A (2012) Carbon footprint. Berkshire Encycl Sustain 6:42–45Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shen B, Choi TM, Lo KY (2016) Enhancing economic sustainability by markdown money supply contracts in the fashion industry: China vs U.S.A. Sustainability 8, 31 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shen B, Li Q, Dong C, Perry P (2017) Sustainability issues in textile and apparel supply chains. Sustainability 9:1592.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15(1):281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veleva V, Hart M, Grenier T, Crumbley C (2003) Indicators for measuring environmental sustainability: a case study of the pharmaceutical industry. Benchmarking: Int J 10:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waage SA, Geiser K, Irwin F, Weissman AB, Bertolucci MD, Fish P, Basile G, Cowan S, Cauley H, McPherson A (2005) Fitting together the building blocks for sustainability: a revised model for integrating ecological, social, and financial factors into business decision-making. J Cleaner Prod 13:1145–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yan Y, Wang C, Ding D, Zhang Y, Wu G, Wang L, Liu X, Du C, Zhang Y (2016) Industrial carbon footprint of several typical Chinese textile fabrics. Acta Ecilogica Sin 36(3):119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringSSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations