Advertisement

Follow the Software: Reflections on the Logistical Worlds Project

  • Brett Neilson
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the productivity and limits of a methodological principle that has informed research for this volume: follow the software. Rather than following the money or following commodities, research for the ‘Logistical Worlds’ project has sought to address its empirical investigations to sites where the interoperativity between software systems breaks down. The hunch has been that such sites will also reveal political conflicts, social inequalities, cultural transactions, and infrastructural workarounds that are constitutive for the logistical project of making things circulate. The chapter pays special attention to the spatial qualities of these sites, arguing that they give rise to forms of territory and territoriality that rival and parallel the forms of political and spatial order established by the state.

References

  1. Allen, Robert C. 2003. From Farm to Factory: A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bear, Laura. 2015. Navigating Austerity: Currents of Debt Along a South Asian River. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloch, Ernst. 1977. ‘Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to its Dialectics.’ New German Critique 11 (Spring): 22–38.Google Scholar
  4. China Daily. 2017. ‘Piraeus Port Has Never Witnessed Such Glory: PCT Employee.’ 15 May 2017. http://www.Chinadaily.com.cn/business/2017-05/15/content_29347561.htm
  5. Collier, Stephen J. 2011. Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cowen, Deborah. 2014. The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Easterling, Keller. 2014. Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Gregson, Nicky, Mike Crang, and Constantinos N. Antonpoulos. 2017. ‘Holding Together Logistical Worlds: Friction, Seams and Circulation in the “Global Warehouse.”’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35, no. 3: 381–98.Google Scholar
  9. Himatsingka, Anuradha. 2017. ‘Kolkata Port Trust Records Highest Container Throughput in FY 2016–17.’ The Economic Times, 14 March 2017. http://economictimes.Indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/shipping-/-transport/Kolkata-port-trust-records-highest-container-throughput-in-fy-2016-17/articleshow/57632702.cms
  10. Hatzopoulos, Pavlos, Nelli Kambouri, and Ursula Huws. 2014. ‘The Containment of Labour in Accelerated Global Supply chains: The Case of Piraeus Port.’ Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation 8, no. 1: 12–28.Google Scholar
  11. Home, Andy. 2017. ‘China Still Hungry for Copper, But Not in Refined Form.’ Reuters. 28 April 2017. http://www.reuters.com/article/China-copper-ahome-idUSL8N1HZ6S1
  12. Kambouri, Nelli. 2014. ‘Dockworker Masculinities.’ Logistical Worlds: Infrastructure, Software, Labour (blog), 15 December 2014. http://logisticalworlds.org/blogs/dockworker-masculinities#more-279
  13. Kanngieser, Anja, Brett Neilson, and Ned Rossiter. 2014. ‘What is a Research Platform? Mapping Methods, Mobilities, and Subjectivities.’ Media, Culture and Society 36, no. 3: 302–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, Kap Hwan and Hoon Lee. 2015. ‘Container Terminal Operation: Current Trends and Future Challenges.’ In Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics: Making Global Supply chains Effective, edited by Chung-Yee Lee and Qiang Meng, 43–73. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Kitchin, Rob and Martin Dodge. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Labrut, Michele. 2015. ‘West Coast Latin American Ports Expand Amid Fierce Competition.’ Journal of Commerce, 4 December 2015. http://www.joc.com/port-news/south-american-ports/west-coast-latin-america-ports-expand-amid-fierce-competition_20151204.html
  17. Mezzadra, Sandro and Brett Neilson. 2013. Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mitra, Iman Kumar and Mithilesh Kumar. 2016. ‘Kolkata as a Logistical Hub with Special Reference to Kolkata Port.’ Policies and Practices – Logistical Spaces III: Hubs, Connectivity and Transit 78: 17–33.Google Scholar
  19. NAVIS. 2016. ‘Terminal Pacífico Sur Valparaíso Goes Live with N4 Terminal Operating System.’ 4 May 2016. http://navis.com/news/press/terminal-pacifico-sur-valparaiso-goes-live-n4-terminal-operating-system
  20. Neilson, Brett. 2017. ‘Belt and Road: State Transformation and Large Technical Systems.’ The Interpreter, 15 May 2017. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/belt-and-road-state-transformation-and-large-technical-systems
  21. Olivier, Daniel and Brian Slack. 2006. ‘Rethinking the Port.’ Environment and Planning A 38, no. 8: 1409–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parsanoglou, Dimitris. 2014. ‘Trojan Horses, Black Holes and the Impossibility of Labour Struggles.’ Logistical Worlds: Infrastructure, Software, Labour (blog), 15 December 2014. http://logisticalworlds.org/blogs/trojan-horses-black-holes#more-277
  23. Quiroga, Javiera. 2017. ‘Chile Hitches Ride on China Coattails as Copper Addiction Eases.’ Bloomberg, 26 July 2017. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-26/chile-hitches-ride-on-China-coattails-as-copper-addiction-eases
  24. Rojas, René. 2016. ‘Out of the Ashes: The Resurrection of the Chilean Labor Movement.’ New Labor Forum 25, no. 2: 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rossiter, Ned. 2016. Software, Infrastructure, Labor: A Media Theory of Logistical Nightmares. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Samaddar, Ranabir. 2016. A Post-Colonial Enquiry into Europe’s Debt and Migration Crisis. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Selznick, Philip. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study of Politics and Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. South China Morning Post. 2015. ‘Port of Valparaiso Brings Chile and China Closer Together.’ 30 September 2015. http://www.scmp.com/presented/business/topics/2015-chile-business-report/article/1862715/port-valparaiso-brings-chile
  29. Spiliopoulou, Maria and Valentini Anagnostopoulou. 2017. ‘Piraeus Port, Shining Star in Modern Maritime Silk Road.’ Xinhua, 15 May 2017. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-05/15/c_136283017.htm
  30. TCVAL. 2016. ‘Trabajadores portuarios de Valparaíso y OPVAL firman importante acuerdo que establece mejoras laborales.’ 8 February 2016. http://www.tcval.cl/sala-de-prensa/noticias/2016/08022016_trabajadores-firman-acuerdo-mejoras-laborales/
  31. Tironi, Manuel and Israel Rodríguez-Giralt. 2017. ‘Healing, Knowing, Enduring: Care and Politics in Damaged Worlds.’ The Sociological Review Monographs 65, no. 2: 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsing, Anna. 2009. ‘Supply chains and the Human Condition.’ Rethinking Marxism 21, no. 20: 148–76.Google Scholar
  33. World Cargo News. 2010. ‘TSB Bags Piraeus Deal.’ May 2010.Google Scholar
  34. World Cargo News. 2013. ‘TSB in the Process Mine.’ May 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brett Neilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Culture and SocietyWestern Sydney UniversityParramattaAustralia

Personalised recommendations