Advertisement

Logistics of the Accident: E-Waste Management in Hong Kong

  • Rolien Hoyng
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reviews logistical practices, software, and narratives that govern e-waste across formal and informal recycling circuits in Hong Kong. It rethinks the order/disorder binary that typically frames waste. E-waste appears to be an ambiguous denomination and its mobility is not strictly surveilled. Yet rather than failure, this signifies the transformation of power and governance, from what Foucault labels discipline and security into what Massumi terms environmental power. The use of logistical software as well as the interfacing between the formal and informal circuits shows that, paradoxically, e-waste’s transient nature is both constructed and de facto emergent in an uncontrollable fashion. This chapter understands logistics beyond the connotation of a singular, rational strategy and analyzes the normalized disappearance of e-waste as an accident that is produced as such, yet not contained.

References

  1. Barad, Karen. 2003. ‘Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, no. 3: 801–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of the Thing. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bisschop, Lieselot. 2016. Governance of the Illegal Trade in E-Waste and Tropical Timber: Case Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bisschop, Lieselot. 2012. ‘Is It All Going to Waste? Illegal Transports of E-Waste in a European Trade Hub.’ Crime, Law, and Social Change 58: 221–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Office of the Government Chief Information Officer. 2017. Hong Kong: A Premier Location as an ICT Hub. Accessed 13 October 2017. https://www.ogcio.gov.hk/en/facts/doc/Fact_Sheet-HK_as_ICT_Hub-EN.pdf
  6. Chung, Shan Shan, Ka-yan Lau and Chan Zhang. 2011. ‘Generation of and Control Measures for E-Waste in Hong Kong.’ Waste Management 3: 544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowen, Deborah. 2014. The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dieter, Michael. 2011. ‘The Becoming Environmental of Power: Tactical Media after Control.’ Fibreculture Journal 18: 177–205.Google Scholar
  9. Easterling, Keller. 2014. Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Fleischmann, Moritz, Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Patrick Buellens, and Rommert Dekker. 2003. ‘Reverse Logistics Network Design.’ In Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for a Close-Loop Supply Chains, edited by Rommert Dekker, 65–94. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Friends of the Earth. 2011. The Policy Study Report on the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. Accessed 14 October 2016. https://www.foe.co.uk/.../report-influence-eu-policies-environment-9392
  13. Gabrys, Jennifer. 2013. Digital Rubbish: A Natural History of Electronics. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gille, Zsuzsa. 2010. ‘Actor Networks, Modes of Production, and Waste Regimes: Reassembling the Macro-Social.’ Environment and Planning A 42, no. 5: 1049–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenpeace. 2003. 香港:電子毒物自自由港? [Hong Kong: E-waste Freeport?]. Accessed 15 October 2016. http://www.greenpeace.org/hk/press/releases/toxics/2003/08/96293/
  16. Greve, Curtis, and Jerry Davis. 2012. ‘Recovering Lost Profits by Improving Reverse Logistics.’ Accessed 15 October 2016. https://www.ups.com/medi/en/Reverse_Logistics_wp.pdf
  17. Hu, Kelly. 2008. ‘Made in China: The Cultural Logic of OEMs and the Manufacture of Low-Cost Technology.’ Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 9, no. 1: 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, Steven. 2014. ‘Rethinking Repair.’ In Media Technologies – Essays on Communication, Materiality and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski, and Kristen Foot. Cambridge, 221–39. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kokkinaki, Angelica, Rob Zuidwijk, Jo van Nunen, and Rommert Dekker. 2003. ‘ICT Enabling Reverse Logistics.’ In Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for a Close-Loop Supply Chains, edited by Rommert Dekker, Moritz Fleischmann, Karl Inderfurth, and Luk N. van Wassenhove, 381–406. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Lehr, Christian, Jörn-Hendrik Thunb, and Peter Milling. 2013. ‘From Waste to Value – A System Dynamics Model for Strategic Decision-Making in Closed-Loop Supply Chains.’ International Journal of Production 51, no. 13: 4105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lepawsky, Josh. 2015. ‘The Changing Geography of Global Trade in Electronic Discards: Time to Rethink the E-Waste Problem.’ The Geographical Journal 181, no. 2: 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lepawsky, Josh. 2012. ‘Legal Geographies of E-Waste Legislation in Canada and the US: Jurisdiction, Responsibility and the Taboo of Production.’ Geoforum 43, no. 6: 1194–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, Richard and Tarin Tee. 2012. ‘A Reverse Logistics Model for Recovery Options of Ewaste Considering the Integration of the Formal and Informal Waste Sectors.’ Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 40: 788–816.Google Scholar
  24. Massumi, Brian. 2009. ‘National Enterprise Emergency: Steps Toward an Ecology of Powers.’ Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 6: 153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maxwell, Richard and Toby Miller. 2012. Greening the Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mezzadra, Sandro and Brett Neilson. 2012. ‘Between Inclusion and Exclusion: On the Topology of Global Space and Borders.’ Theory, Culture & Society 29, nos. 4–5: 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore, Jason. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Oracle. 2014. ‘Oracle’s Depot Repair Implementation: Driving Product Take-Back and Recycling at Oracle.’ White Paper. Accessed 15 October 2016. www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/green/oracle-reverse-2320318.pdf
  29. Pang, Laikwan. 2012. Creativity and Its Discontents: China’s Creative Industries and Intellectual Property Rights Offenses. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parikka, Jussi. 2015. A Geology of Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Puckett, James, Eric Hopson, Eric Huang, and Monica Huang. 2016. Disconnect: Goodwill and Dell, Exporting the Public’s E-Waste to Developing Countries. Basel Action Network (BAN). Accessed 21 March 2017. http://www.ban.org/news/2016/5/9/goodwill-and-dell-inc-exposed-as-exporters-of-us-publics-toxic-electronic-waste-to-developing-countries
  32. Rosier, Mathieu and Bertjan Janzen. 2008. ‘Reverse Logistics. PricewaterhouseCoopers.’ Accessed 15 October 2016. www.pwc.nl/nl/assets/documents/pwc-reverse-logistics.pdf
  33. Pickren, Graham. 2014. ‘Political Ecologies of Electronic Waste: Uncertainty and Legitimacy in the Governance of E-Waste Geographies.’ Environment and Planning A 46, no. 1: 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rossiter, Ned. 2016. Software, Infrastructure, Labor: A Media Theory of Logistical Nightmares. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Rossiter, Ned. 2009. ‘Translating the Indifference of Communication: Electronic Waste, Migrant Labour and the Informational Sovereignty of Logistics in China.’ International Review of Information Ethics 11 (October): 35–44.Google Scholar
  36. United Nations Environmental Program (2015) Waste Crime – Waste Risks: Gaps in Meeting the Global Waste Challenge. Accessed 15 October 2016. www.unep.org/delc/Portals/119/publications/rra-wastecrime.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolien Hoyng
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Journalism and CommunicationChinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations