Advertisement

Development History of Endovascular Surgery and Devices

  • Jiaxuan Feng
  • Zaiping Jing
Chapter

Abstract

There are six major techniques for endovascular treatment, i.e., percutaneous endovascular balloon angioplasty, endovascular stent angioplasty, endovascular graft exclusion for artery dilatations, endovascular thrombolysis, endovascular embolectomy, and minimally invasive endovascular replacement of cardiac valves, none of which can do without continuous improvement and innovation of endovascular devices. While Seldinger percutaneous vascular puncture has opened the first chapter of endovascular treatment, percutaneous endovascular balloon angioplasty is the first step of endovascular treatment. It has experienced the stages of catheter dilatation, classical balloon dilation, special drug-eluting balloon, and so forth, having laid the foundation of endovascular treatment. Similarly, stent, a representative of endovascular implants, has also undergone continuous innovations of bare stent, drug-eluting stent, and absorbable stent. However, when it comes to comparing the long-term advantages and disadvantages of stents of different configurations and materials after having been applied at different sites of the human body, more clinical researches are required for further confirmation. Besides progress in peripheral arterial devices, fast-changing innovations are also being carried out on devices used for the endovascular treatment of aortic diseases. As for endovascular devices applied to aortic dilatations, from the coating materials at the beginning, through the small-caliber delivery systems, to the innovations in the overall configurations of stent grafts, more and more aortic diseases which could not handle minimally invasive endovascular treatment in the past can now be cured through endovascular treatment. In short, endovascular devices adopt further minimally invasive treatment, higher disease adaptability and better long-term effectiveness as their development directions, and the endless emergence of new design concepts (such as individualized customization), new materials and new manufacturing processes forecasts the accelerated arrival of an era in which all vascular diseases can be cured through minimally invasive endovascular treatment.

Keywords

Endovascular treatment Development history of endovascular devices 

References

  1. 1.
    White GH, Yu W, May J, et al. Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis and management. J Endovasc Surg. 1997;4(2):152–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naghi J, Yalvac EA, Pourdjabbar A, et al. New developments in the clinical use of drug-coated balloon catheters in peripheral arterial disease. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016;9:161–74.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Veith FJ, Baum BA, Ohki T, et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1029–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baxendale BR, Baker DM, Hutchinson A, et al. Haemodynamic and metabolic response to endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Br J Anaesthesia. 1996;77:581–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Cope C, et al. Aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:32–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mehta M, Veith FJ, Ohki T, et al. Significance of endotension, endoleak and aneurysm pulsatility after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:842–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD): new insight into an old disease. JAMA. 2000;283:897–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zimpfer D, Schima H, Czerny M, et al. Experimental stent-graft treatment of ascending aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:470–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang Z, Massimo C, Li M, et al. Deployment of endograft in the ascending aorta to reverse type A aortic dissection. Asian J Surg. 2003;26:117–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng R, Zhao Z, Bao J, et al. Double-chimney technology for treating secondary type I endoleak after endovascular repair for complicated thoracic aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:212–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuan L, Feng X, Jing Z. Endovascular repair of a thoracic arch aneurysm with a fenestrated stent-graft. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:539–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lu Q, Jing Z, Zhao Z, et al. Endovascular stent graft repair of aortic dissection type B extending to the aortic arch. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42:456–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin C, Lu Q, Liao M, et al. Endovascular repair of the half aortic arch in pigs with an improved, single-branched stent graft system for the brachiocephalic trunk. Vascular. 2011;19:242–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayashida K, Lefevre T, Chevalier B, et al. Transfemoral aortic valve implantation new criteria to predict vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:851–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    David HD, Manish M, Karthik K, et al. The phase I multicenter trial (STAPLE-1) of the Aptus endovascular repair system: results at 6 months and 1 year. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:851–7; discussion 857–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic- valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reijnen MM, de Bruin JL, Mathijssen EG, et al. Global experience with the nellix endosystem for ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:21–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stone GW. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: more different than alike? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:575–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Vascular SurgeryChanghai Hospital, Second Military Medical UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations