Advertisement

Developing a Research Agenda for Accelerating Progress on Improving Quality of Care

  • Jay Satia
  • Kavita Chauhan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents emerging priorities for research to accelerate progress on improving quality of care in family planning in India. The emerging research agenda based on our review is as follows. Client related: client perceptions of quality of care being provided in terms of dimensions of quality of care; influence of agency and autonomy of clients as well as social context and informed choice; and improving quality of care in adolescent/youth family planning services. Provider related: enabling and motivating providers to provide quality of care; effect of health system, operations, and context influencing quality of care in family planning. Programme related: quality of care improvement systems and activating organizational mechanisms to improve quality of care; quality of care metrics, monitoring system; ensuring quality of care while introducing additional methods; enhancing accountability of the programme with regard to quality of care; and benefits of improved quality of care.

Keywords

Agency Accountability Social context Metrics Monitoring system 

References

  1. AVSC International. (1999). Self-assessment for supervisors and managers. New York: AVSC International.Google Scholar
  2. Bruce, J. (1990). Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework. Studies in Family Planning, 21(2), 61–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association, 121(11), 1145–1150.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jain, A. K. (1989). Fertility reduction and the quality of family planning services. Studies in Family Planning, 20(1), 1–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Khan, M. E., Dixit, A., Ahmad, J., & Pillai, G. (2015). Introduction of DMPA in public health facilities of Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan: An evaluation. New Delhi: Project Brief, Population Council.Google Scholar
  6. MoHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2014a). India’s vision FP2020. New Delhi: Family Planning Division, Government of India.Google Scholar
  7. MoHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2014b). Strategic guidelines. Rashtriya Kishori Swasthya Karyakram.Google Scholar
  8. NHSRC (National Health Systems Resource Centre). (2013). Operational guidelines for quality assurance in public health facilities. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.Google Scholar
  9. PMA2020. https://pma2020.org/research/country-reports/india. Accessed July 26, 2017.
  10. Roy, T. K., & Verma, R. K. (1999). Women’s perceptions of the quality of family welfare services in four Indian states. In M. A. Koenig & M. E. Khan (Eds.), Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme (pp. 19–32). New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  11. WHO (World Health Organization). (2016). Quality of care in contraceptive information and services, based on human rights standards: A checklist for health care providers. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  12. WHO (World Health Organization), & UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund). (2015). Ensuring human rights in contraceptive service delivery: Implementation guide. Geneva: WHO, New York: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  13. Yinger, N. V. (1998). Unmet need for family planning: Reflecting women’s perceptions. Washington, D.C.: International Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Public Health GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Public Health Foundation of IndiaGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations