Green Buildings: The Role of HFE

  • Erminia Attaianese
Chapter

Abstract

Considering the critical impact of construction sector on sustainable development, a number of green building assessment systems and rating tools have been developed to foster building stakeholders, professionals, and consumers, to request, adopt, and implement sustainable goals in the design of buildings. Starting from a literature review on relationships between HFE and building sustainability, the chapter investigates the current role of HFE in the design of green sustainable buildings. A comparison of the main sustainable rating tools, from the human factors perspective, is presented in order to identify where, how, and what human-related factors are included in the assessment criteria. A discussion about the contribution that HFE has already done, and may further provide, to the green building domain is proposed.

Keywords

Green building rating tools Indoor Environmental Quality Building controls User controls LEED BREEAM GreenStar Building construction Building maintenance Workplace layout and design 

References

  1. Abbaszadeh, S., Zagreus, L., Lehrer, D., & Huizenga, C. (2006). Occupant satisfaction with indoor air environmental quality in green buildings. Proceedings of the healthy buildings 2006 conference, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 365–370.Google Scholar
  2. Aickin, C., & Pollard, B. (2013). GreenStar interiors rating tool – Ergonomic credit. What should CPE’s know? Proceedings of the 49th annual human factors and ergonomics society of Australia conference 2013, pp. 198–202.Google Scholar
  3. Akadiri, P. O., Chinyio, E., & A. & Olomolaiye P.O. (2012). Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector. Buildings, 2012(2), 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alayami, S., & Rezgui, R. (2012). Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 5, 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alho, J., Nenonen, S., & Nissinen, K. (2008). Usability assessment of shopping centres: Components of usability rating tool. CIB usability of workplaces phase 2. http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB8912.pdf
  6. Altomonte, S., Rutherford, P., & Wilson, R. (2015). Human factors in the design of sustainable built environments. Intelligent Buildings International, 7(4), 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alwaer, H., & Clements-Croome, D. J. (2010). Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings. Building and Environment, 45, 799–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alzaed, A., & Boussabaine, A. H. (2012, September 3–5). Towards a new methodology for integrating user expectations into passive building design. In S. D. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings 28th annual ARCOM conference (pp. 1467–1477). Edinburgh, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.Google Scholar
  9. Asdrubali, F., Baldinelli, G., Bianchi, F., & Sambuco, S. (2015). A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 86, 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Attaianese, E. (2011). Human factors in maintenance for a sustainable management of built environment. In J. Lindfors, M. Savolainen, & S. Väyrynen (Eds.), Wellbeing and innovation through ergonomics. Proceedings of NES2011 (NordikErgonomic Society), Oulu, Finland, pp. 129–134.Google Scholar
  11. Attaianese, E. (2012). A broader consideration of human factors to enhance sustainable building design. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 2155–2159.Google Scholar
  12. Attaianese, E. (2014). Human factors in design of sustainable buildings. In M. Soares & F. Rebelo (Eds.), Advances in ergonomics is design and usability and special population part III, USA: AHFE, pp. 392–403Google Scholar
  13. Attaianese, E. (2016). Increasing sustainability by improving full use of public space: Human centred design for easy-to-walk built environment. In F. Rebelo & M. Soares (Eds.), Ergonomics in design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 international conference on ergonomics in design. Walt Disney World, FL: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Attaianese, E., & Duca, G. (2010). Human factors and ergonomic principles in building design for life and work activities: An applied methodology. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 13(2), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Attaianese, E., & Duca, G. (2012). The human component of sustainability: A study for assessing human performance of energy efficient construction blocks. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 2141–2146.Google Scholar
  16. Barlow, S., & Fiala, D. (2007). Occupant comfort in UK offices—How adaptive comfort theories might influence future low energy office refurbishment strategies. Energy and Buildings, 39, 837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berardi, U. (2011). Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: Rating systems and rated buildings. Sustainable Development, 20, 411–424. November/December 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berardi, U. (2013). Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berardi, U. (2015). Sustainability assessments of buildings, communities, and cities. In J. J. Kleme (Ed.), Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability (pp. 497–545). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boerstra, A., Beuker, T., Loomans, M., & Hensen, J. (2013). Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices. Architectural Science Review, 56(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown, C., & Legg, S. (2011). Human factors and ergonomics for business sustainability. In G. Eweje & M. Perry (Eds.), Business and sustainability: Concepts, strategies and changes, critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability (Vol. 3, pp. 61–81). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  22. Capolongo, S., Gola, M., di Noia, M., Nickolova, M., Nachiero, D., Rebecchi, A., et al. (2016). Social sustainability in the healthcare facilities: A rating tool for analysing and improving social aspects in environment of care. Ann Ist Sup Sanità, 52(1), 15–23.Google Scholar
  23. Ceylan, C., Dul, J., & Aytac, S. (2008). Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 18(6), 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chan, E. (2014). Building maintenance strategy: A sustainable refurbishment perspective. Universal Journal of Management, 2, 19–25.Google Scholar
  25. Charitonowicz, J., & Leszeks, S. (2001). Toward sustainable housing – Ergonomics of housing stock management organization as dematerialization. In M. J. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Systems, social, and internationalization design aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 392–396). London: Laurence Lerbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Charytonowicz, J. (2007). Reconsumption and recycling in the ergonomic design of architecture. Universal access, Lecture notes in computer science (Human-computer interaction. Ambient Interaction), Vol. 4555.Google Scholar
  27. Chen, H. (2010). CPWR: Green and healthy jobs. Berkeley, CA: University of California. http://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/publications/Green-Healthy%20Jobs%20fnl%20for%20posting.pdf
  28. Chiocchio, F., Forgues, D., Paradis, D., & Iordanova, I. (2011, December). Teamwork in integrated design projects: Understanding the effects of trust, conflict, and collaboration non performance. Project Management Journal, 42(6), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clements-Croome, D. (2000). Productivity and indoor environment. Proceedings of healthy buildings conference University of Technology, Helsinki, Vol 1, 629–634.Google Scholar
  30. Clements-Croome, D. (2006). Creating productive workplaces (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Clements-Croome, D. (2013). Can intelligent buildings provide alternative approaches to heating, ventilating and air conditioning of buildings? Droesti Lecture, RACA Journal, 29(6), 22–33.Google Scholar
  32. Clements-Croome, D. (2014). Sustainable intelligent buildings for better health, comfort and well-being. Report for Denzero Project supported by the TÁMOP- 4.2.2.A- 11/1/KONV-2012-0041 co-financed by the European Union and the European Social Fund. http://www.derekcroome.com/Document%20Files/DENZERO.pdf
  33. Cole, R. J. (2014). Comprehensive assessment system for building environmental efficiency. In S. Murakami, K. Iwamura, & R. Cole (Eds.), CASBEE. A decade of development and application of an environmental assessment system for the built environment Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation (pp. 12–25).Google Scholar
  34. Cole, R. J., Brown, Z., & McKay, S. (2010). Building human agency: A timely manifesto. Building Research and Information, 38, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Delos. (2016). The WELL building standard v1. New York.Google Scholar
  36. Dewlaney, K., Hallowell, M. R., & Fortunato, B. R. (2012). Safety risk quantification for high performance sustainable building construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138, 964–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dewlaney, K. S., & Hallowell, M. (2012). Prevention through design and construction safety management strategies for high performance sustainable building construction. Construction Management and Economics, 30, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. DGNB CORE 14. (2014). Criteria overview. Office version. http://www.dgnb-system.de/en/system/criteria/core14/
  39. Dirlich, S. (2011). Comparison of assessment and certification schemes for sustainable building and suggestions for an international standard system. The IMRE Journal, 5, 1–12.Google Scholar
  40. Dorsey, J. (2016). Sustainable design in the workplace. In A. Hedge (Ed.), Ergonomic workplace design for health, wellness, and productivity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  41. Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P., Marras, W. S., et al. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55, 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work – EASHW. (2013). E-fact 70 occupational safety and health issues associated with green building. https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/e-facts/e-fact-70-occupational-safety-and-health-issues-associated-with-green-building/view
  43. Feifer, L. (2011, July 13–15). Sustainability indicators in buildings. Identifying key performance indicators. 27th international conference on passive and low energy architecture. Architecture and sustainable development.Google Scholar
  44. Fischer, E. A. (2011). Issues in green building and the federal response: An introduction. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, R40147, Washington, DC, 2010. Retrieved on line August 28, 2011.Google Scholar
  45. Flemming, S. A. C., Hilliard, A., & Jamieson, G. A. (2007, February 6). Considering human factors perspectives on sustainable energy systems. Poster presented at the International Society for Industrial Ecology Conference, Toronto.Google Scholar
  46. Flemming, S., Hilliard, A., & Jamieson, G. A. (2008). The need of human factors in the sustainability domain. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 52nd annual meeting.Google Scholar
  47. Fowler, K. M., & Rauch, E. M. (2006). Sustainable building systems summary. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle. http://www.usgbc.org/Docs/Archive/General/Docs1915.pdf
  48. Gambatese, J., & Hinze, J. (1999). Addressing construction worker safety in the design phase designing for construction worker safety. Automation in Construction, 8, 643–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. GhaffarianHoseini, A. H., GhaffarianHoseini, A., Makaremi, N., & GhaffarianHoseini, M. (2012). The concept of zero energy intelligent buildings (ZEIB): A review of sustainable development for future cities. The British Journal of Environment & Climate Change, 2, 339–367.Google Scholar
  50. Gram-Hanssen, K. (2014). New needs for better understanding of household’s energy consumption – Behaviour, lifestyle or practices? Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10(1–2), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Green Star-Performance v1.1. (2016). List of credits. https://www.gbca.org.au/uploads/194/36034/List%20of%20Credits_v1.1.pdf
  52. Hanson, M. A. (2013). Green ergonomics: Challenges and opportunities. Ergonomics, 56(3), 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Haron, S. N., Hamid, M. Y., & Talib, A. (2013). Using “USEtool”: Usability evaluation method for quality architecture in-use. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Haslam, R., & Waterson, P. (2013). Ergonomics and sustainability. Ergonomics, 56(3), 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hauge, A. L., Thomsen, J., & Berker, T. (2011). User evaluations of energy efficient buildings: Literature review and further research. Advance in Building Energy Research, 5(1), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hedge, A. (2000). Where we are in understanding the effects of where we are? Ergonomics, 43, 1019–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hedge, A. (2008). The sprouting of “green” ergonomics. HFES Bulletin, 51, 1–3.Google Scholar
  58. Hedge, A., & Dorsey, J. (2013). Green buildings need good ergonomics. Ergonomics, 56, 492–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hedge, A., Rollings, K., & Robinson, J. (2010). “Green” ergonomics: Advocating for the human element in buildings. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 54th annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.Google Scholar
  60. Heerwagen, J. (1998, March 12–14). Design, productivity and well being: What are the links? Paper presented at The American Institute of Architects conference on highly effective facilities Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  61. Heerwagen, J. (2011). Investing in people: The social benefits of sustainable design. Proceedings of the rethinking sustainable, Construction 06, Sarasota, FL.Google Scholar
  62. Heerwagen, J. H. (2000). Green buildings, organizational success, and occupant productivity. Building Research and Information, 28, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Heerwagen, J. H., & Zagreus, L. (2005, April). The human factors of sustainability: A post occupancy evaluation of the Philip Merrill Environmental Center. Summary report for U.S. Department of Energy, Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  64. Hilliard, A. (2008). Can human factors methods help design sustainable buildings? Proceedings of the conference on sustainable building SB08 Melbourne, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  65. ISO 21542:2011. (2011). Building construction. Accessibility and usability of the built environment. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  66. ISO/DIS 15392. (2006). Sustainability in building construction- general principles. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  67. Janda, K. B. (2011). Buildings don’t use energy: People do. Architectural Science Review, 54, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Joshi, S. M. (2008). The sick building syndrome. Indian Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine, 12(2), 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Karwowski, W. (2006). The discipline of ergonomics and human factors. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Kibert, C. J. (2008). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Kim, M. J., Oh, M. W., & Kim, J. T. (2013). A method for evaluating the performance of green buildings with a focus on user experience. Energy and Buildings, 66, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kordjamshid, M. (2011). House rating schemes: From energy to comfort base. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lange-Morales, K., Thatcher, A., & García-Acosta, G. (2014). Synergies between ergoecology and green ergonomics: A contribution towards a sustainability agenda for HFE. Human factors in organizational design and management – Xi Nordic Ergonomics Society annual conference, Vol. 46.Google Scholar
  74. Larsson, N. (2015). SBTool for 2015. iiSBE. http://www.iisbe.org/system/files/SBTool%20Overview%2018Jul15.pdf
  75. Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings? Building Research and Information, 35(6), 662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lee, S. Y., & Kang, M. (2013). Innovation characteristics and intention to adopt sustainable facilities management practices. Ergonomics, 56(3), 480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Leech, J. A., Raizenne, M., & Gusdorf, J. (2011). Health in occupants of energy efficient new homes. Indoor Air, 14(3), 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. LEED. (2015). New LEED pilot credit: Prevention through design. http://www.usgbc.org/articles/new-leed-pilot-credit-prevention-through-design
  79. LEED. (2016a). LEED v4 for building design and construction. http://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/LEED%20v4%20BDC_01.27.17_current.pdf
  80. Lutzenhiser, L. (1993). Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 18, 1–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Martin, K., Legg, S., & Brown, C. (2013). Designing for sustainability: Ergonomics – Carpe diem. Ergonomics, 56(3), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. MIL-HDBK-470. (1997). Department of defense handbook: Designing and developing maintainable products and systems (Volume I). (04 DEC 1997).Google Scholar
  83. Muehleisen, R. T. (2010). Acoustics of green buildings. InformeDesign, 8, 1–7.Google Scholar
  84. Nadadur, G., & Parkinson, M. B. (2013). The role of anthropometry in designing for sustainability. Ergonomics, 56(3), 422–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Newsham, G. R., Mancini, S., & Birt, B. J. (2013). Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but…. Energy and Buildings, 41, 897–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nicol, F., & Roaf, S. (2005). Post occupancy evaluation and field studies of thermal comfort. Building Research and Information, 33(4), 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Obiozo, R., & Smallwood, J. (2013, September 2–4). The role of “greening” and an ecosystem approach to enhancing construction ergonomics. In S. D. Smith & D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui (Eds.), Proceedings 29th annual ARCOM conference. Reading, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.Google Scholar
  88. Peffer, T., Perry, D., Pritoni, M., Aragon, C., & Meier, A. (2013). Facilitating energy savings with programmable thermostats: Evaluation and guidelines for the thermostat user interface. Ergonomics, 56(3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Persons, K. C. (2000). Environmental ergonomics: A review of principles, methods and models. Applied Ergonomics, 31(6), 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rajendran, S., Gambatese, J., & Behm, M. (2009). Impact of green building design and construction on worker safety and health. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 135(10), 1058–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Reed, R., Wilkinson, S., Bilos, A., & Shulte, K. (2011, January 16–19). A comparison of international sustainable building tools – An update. Proceedings of the 17th annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society conference, Gold Coast. https://www.academia.edu/897809/A_Comparison_of_International_Sustainable_Building_Tools_An_Update
  92. Sass, C., & Smallwood, J. (2015, August 9–14). The role of ergonomics in green building. Proceedings of the 19th triennial congress of the IEA, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  93. Siew, R. Y. J., Balabat, M. C. A., & Carmichael, D. G. (2013). A review of building/infrastructure sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2, 106–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sorrento, L. (2012). A natural balance: Interior design, humans and sustainability. Journal of Interior Design, 37(2), ix–xxiii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stedmon, A. W., Winslow, R., & Langley, A. (2013). Micro-generation schemes: User behaviours and attitudes towards energy consumption. Ergonomics, 56(3), 440–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sutcliffe, M., Hooper, P., & Howell, R. (2008). Can eco-foot printing analysis be used successfully to encourage more sustainable behaviour at the household level? Sustainable Development, 16, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thatcher, A. (2013). Green ergonomics: Definition and scope. Ergonomics, 56(3), 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Thatcher, A. & Chunilal, H. (2015, November 1–4). Development and validation of a workspace layout scale for use in green building certifications. Creating sustainable work-environments Nordic Ergonomics Society 47th annual conference, Lillehammer, Norway, pp. A4–A9.Google Scholar
  99. Thatcher, A., & Milner, K. (2012). The impact of a ‘green’ building on employees’ physical and psychological wellbeing. Work, 41, 381–893.Google Scholar
  100. Thatcher, A., & Milner, K. (2014). Changes in productivity, psychological wellbeing and physical wellbeing from working in a ‘green’ building. Work, 49, 381–393.Google Scholar
  101. Thatcher, A., & Milner, K. (2016). Is a green building really better for building occupants? A longitudinal evaluation. Building and Environment, 108, 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2015). A sustainable system of systems approach: A new HFE paradigm. Ergonomics, 59(2), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tidwell, J., & Murphy, J. J. (2010). Bridging the gap- fire safety and green buildings. National Association for Fire Marshals. http://www.firemarshalsarchives.org/pdf/FireSafetyGreenBuildingHiResFINALv3sec.pdf
  104. Toole, T. M., & Gambatese, J. (2008). The trajectories of prevention through design in construction. Journal of Safety Research, 39, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA. (2009). Green building. http://www.epa.gov/greenbuilding/pubs/about.htm.
  106. UN. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations.Google Scholar
  107. UNI/PdR 13.0:2015. (2015). Environmental sustainability of construction works – Operational tools for sustainability assessment. General framework and methodological principles.Google Scholar
  108. UNI/PdR 13.1:2015. (2015). Environmental sustainability of construction works – Operational tools for sustainability assessment. Residential buildings.Google Scholar
  109. US EPA. (2009) Buildings and their impact on the environment: A statistical summary. US EPA Archive document. https://archive.epa.gov/greenbuilding/web/pdf/gbstats.pdf
  110. USGBC. (2008a). Administrative credit interpretation ruling innovation in design and innovation in operations credit for an ergonomics strategy. http://www.usgbc.org/Docs/Archive/General/Docs5408.pdf
  111. USGBC. (2008b). Ergonomics requirements for innovation and design point: Example of a user survey for ergonomics issues. http://ergo.human.cornell.edu/USGBC/USGBC_Ergonomic_Survey.pdf
  112. Vierra, S. (2014). Green building standards and certification systems. In Whole building design guide. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/gbs.php
  113. Vink, P., & Hallbeck, S. (2012). Editorial: Comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Applied Ergonomics, 43(2), 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Waris, M., Liew, M. S., Kamidi, M. F., & Idrus, A. (2014). Criteria for the selection of sustainable onsite construction equipment. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3, 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. (2014). Green building research-current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erminia Attaianese
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations