Advertisement

Techniques in the Collection, Preservation and Morphological Identification of Freshwater Zooplankton

  • N. Manickam
  • P. Santhanam
  • P. Saravana Bhavan
Chapter

Abstract

The word plankton (Greek for “wanderer” or “drifter”) was coined by the German Marine Biologist Victor Hensen (1887). The terminology “plankton” is plural (singular – plankter). Plankton community is a heterogeneous group of tiny plants (phytoplankton) and animals (zooplankton) adapted to suspension in the sea and fresh water. Their intrinsic movements, if any, are so feeble that they remain essentially at the mercy of every water current. It is a potentially functional community of similar organizational rank implicit in the terms forest or grassland communities. The terminology “plankton” included all organic particles, which float freely and involuntarily in the open water independent of shore and bottom. The dependence of plankton upon water movement for maintenance and transport is accurately implied in this definition (Greek word – planktos, meaning wandering). The term plankton refers to any small biota (from microns to centimeters) living in the water and drifting at the mercy of currents, ranging from bacteria to sea jelly.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the authorities of Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli-24, Tamil Nadu, India, for providing the necessary facilities. The first author (NM) gratefully acknowledges the SERB, Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India, New Delhi, for financial support through PI/National Post-Doctoral Fellowship (N-PDF) (DST-SERB, file no.: PDF/2016/000738; dated 05.06.2016).

References

  1. Altaff, K. 2004. A Manual of Zooplankton, 19–145. Chennai: Department of Zoology, The New College.Google Scholar
  2. Altaff, K., and R. Chandran. 1995. Food and feeding behaviour of the freshwater diaptomid Heliodiaptomus viduus (Gurney). Journal of Ecobiology 7 (2): 125–130.Google Scholar
  3. APHA. 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  4. Arora, J., and N.K. Mehra. 2003. Seasonal diversity of planktonic and epiphytic rotifers in the backwaters of the Delhi segment of the Yamuna river, with remarks on new records from India. Zoological Studies 42: 239–249.Google Scholar
  5. Balcer, M.D., N.L. Korda, and S.I. Dodson. 1984. Zooplankton of the Great Lakes: A guide to the Identification and Ecology of the Common Crustacean Species. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  6. Battish, S.K. 1992. Freshwater Zooplankton of India. Vol. 233, 6. Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Publication.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, T.E., and L.G. Abele. 1982. Classification of the recent Crustacea. In The Biology of Crustacea, Systematics, the Fossil Record and Biogeography, ed. D.E. Bliss, vol. 1, 1–319. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bulkowski, L., W.F. Krise, and K.A. Kraus. 1985. Purification of cyclops cultures by pH shock (Copepod). Crustaceana 48: 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butlin, R.K., and P. Menozzi. 2000. Open questions in evolutionary ecology: Do Ostracods have the answers? Hydrobiologia 419: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhanapathi, M.V.S.S.S. 2000. Taxonomic Notes on the Rotifers. Vol. 6, 178. Hyderabad: Indian Association of Aquatic Biologists.Google Scholar
  11. Dhanapathi, M.V.S.S.S. 2003. Rotifers from Andhra Pradesh, India–III. Hydrobiologia 48 (1): 9–16.Google Scholar
  12. Dole-Olivier, M.J., D.M.P. Galassi, P. Marmonier, and Creuze Des Chatelliers. 2000. The biology and ecology of lotic microcrustaceans. Freshwater Biology 44: 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downing, J.A., and F.H. Rigler. 1984. A Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Freshwaters, IBP Hand Book. Vol. 17, 501. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Dujardin, F. 1841. Histoire naturelle des zoophytes. Infusoriens welt. Vol. 678. Paris: Suites a Buffon.Google Scholar
  15. Dussart, B.H., and D. Defaye. 1995. Copepoda: Introduction to the Copepoda. In Guides to the Identification cation of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, vol. 7, 1–277. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Edmondson, W.T. 1959. Freshwater Biology. 2nd ed. New York/London: Wiley/Chapman and Hall Limited.Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert, J.J. 1985. Escape response of the rotifer Polyarthra: A high-speed cinematographic analysis. Oecologia 66: 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goulden, C.E. 1968. The systematic and evolution of the Moinidae. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 58 (6): 1–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hensen, V. 1887. Ueber die Bestimmug des planktons oder des im Meera treibenden materials an Pflanzen and Thieren. Ber. Kommn. Zur wiss. Untersuchung der deutschen Meere, In Kiel. Schmidt & Klaunig 5:1–107.Google Scholar
  20. Horne, D.J., A. Cohen, and K. Martens. 2002. Taxonomy, morphology and biology of quaternary and living Ostracoda. In The Ostracoda: Applications in Quaternary Research: AGU Geophysical Monograph Series, 131, ed. J.A. Holmes and A.R. Chivas, 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huys, R., and G.A. Boxshall. 1991. Copepod evolution, Ray Society Publication. Vol. 159, 1–468. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, D.S. 1952 The British species of the genus Daphnia (Crustacea, Cladocera). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 122: 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiran, B.R., E.T. Puttaiah, and D. Kamath. 2007. Diversity and seasonal fluctuation of zooplankton in fish pond of Bhadra fish farm, Karnataka, India. Zoos, Print 22: 2935–2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolkwitz, R. 1912. Plankton und Seston. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 30: 334–346.Google Scholar
  25. Korovchinsky, N.M. 1996. How many species of Cladocera are there? Hydrobiologia 321: 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koste, W. 1980. Das radertier-portrat. Brachionus plicatilis, ein salzwasserradertier. Mikrokosmos 5: 148–155.Google Scholar
  27. Manickam, N. 2015. Biodiversity of Plankton in Two Perennial Lakes of Coimbatore, India and Suitability of Wild Mixed Zooplankton as Live Feed for Rearing of the Giant Freshwater Prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii Early Post larvae. Ph.D., thesis, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu, India. 1–145.Google Scholar
  28. Martens, K., I. Schon, C. Meisch, and D.J. Horne. 2008. Global diversity of ostracods (Ostracoda, Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meisch, C. 2000. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe. Subwasser fauna von Mitteleuropa. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
  30. Mezquita, F., J.R. Roca, J.M. Reed, and G. Wansard. 2005. Quantifying species environment relationships in non-marine Ostracoda for ecological and palaeoecological studies: Examples using Iberian data. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 225: 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Michael, R.G. 1973. A guide to the study of freshwater organisms. 2. Rotatoria. Journal of the Madurai University Supply 1: 23–26.Google Scholar
  32. Michael, R.G. and B.K. Sharma. 1988. Fauna of India, Indian Cladocera. Department of Zoology, North-Eastern Hill University. Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India.Google Scholar
  33. MRC Environment Programme Report. 2015. Identification of Freshwater Zooplankton of the Mekong River and its Tributaries, 1–207. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  34. Murugan, N., P. Murugavel, and M.S. Kodarkar. 1998. Cladocera: The Biology, Classification, Identification and Ecology. Vol. 5, 1–55. Hyderabad: Indian Association of Aquatic Biologists (IAAB).Google Scholar
  35. Orstan, A. 1999. An Introduction to Bdelloid Rotifers. member.aol.com/bdelloid1/deloid.html.
  36. Pantin, C.F.A. 1964. Notes on Microscopical Technique for Zoologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Patil, C.S., and B.Y.M. Gouder. 1989. Freshwater Invertebrates of Dharwad. Dharwad: Prasaranga, Karnataka University.Google Scholar
  38. Reddy, Y.R. 1994. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. In Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae, ed. H.J.F. Dumont, 221. The Hague: SPB Academic Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Riviere, F., B.H. Kay, J.M. Klein, and Y. Sechan. 1987. Mesocyclops aspericornis (Copepoda) and Bacillus thuringiensis var. Israelensis for biological control of Aedes and Culex vectors (Diptera: Culicidae) breeding in crab holes, tree holes, and artificial containers. Journal of Medical Entomology 24: 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruttner, F. 1975. Fundamentals of Limnology, 3rd ed, 307. Trans. D.G. Frey and F.E. Fry, from German University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  41. Schwoerbel, J. 1970. Methods of Hydrobiology (Freshwater Biology), 200. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sewell, R.B.S. 1947. The free swimming planktonic Copepoda. Scientific Reports John Murray Expedition 1933–34. Zoology and Botany 8(1): 1–303.Google Scholar
  43. Sharma, B.K. 1998. Faunal Diversity in India: Rotifera. ed. J.R.B. Alferd, A.K. Das, and A.K. Sanyal, 57–70. ENVIS Centre, ZSI.Google Scholar
  44. Sharma, J.G., and R. Chakrabarti. 2000. Replacement of live-food with refrigerated-plankton food for Cyprinu scarpio (L) larvae cultured with three different types of biological filters. Current Science 79: 214–219.Google Scholar
  45. Sharma, B.K., and R.G. Michael. 1980. Synopsis of taxonomic studies on Indian Rotatoria. Hydrobiologia 73: 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 1987. Review of taxonomic studies on freshwater Cladocera from India with remarks on biogeography. Hydrobiologia 145: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, K.E., and C.H. Fernando. 1978. A guide to the freshwater calanoid and cyclopoid copepod crustacea of Ontario. University of Waterloo Biology Series 18: 1–74.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, A.J., and D.J. Horne. 2002. Ecology of marine, marginal marine and non marine ostracodes. In The Ostracoda: Applications in Quaternary Research, ed. J.A. Holmes and A.R. Chivas, vol. 131, 37–64. Washington, DC: Geophysical Monograph, The American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Victor, R., and C.H. Fernando. 1979. The freshwater Ostracods (Crustacea; Ostracoda) on India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 74 (2): 147–242.Google Scholar
  50. Viehberg, F.A. 2004. Paleolimnological study based on Ostracods (Crustacea) in Late-glacial and Holocene deposits of lake Krakower See in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern NE Germany. Studia Quaternaria 21: 109–115.Google Scholar
  51. Waters, T.F. 1977. Secondary production in inland waters. Advances in Ecological Research 10: 11–164.Google Scholar
  52. Welch, P.S. 1948. Limnological Methods, 381. Philadelphia: Blackston Co.Google Scholar
  53. Wilhelmi, J. 1917. Plankton und Tripton. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 11: 113–150.Google Scholar
  54. Willen, E. 1999. Preliminary revision of the Pseudotachidiidae Lang, 1936 (Copepoda and Harpacticoida). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 215: 221–225.Google Scholar
  55. Williamson, C.E. 1991. In Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, ed. J.H. Thorp and A.P. Covich, 787–822. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Manickam
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Santhanam
    • 3
  • P. Saravana Bhavan
    • 4
  1. 1.Marine Planktonology and Aquaculture Laboratory, Department of Marine Science, School of Marine SciencesBharathidasan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  2. 2.Crustacean Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, School of Life SciencesBharathiar UniversityCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Marine Planktonology and Aquaculture Laboratory, Department of Marine ScienceBharathidasan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  4. 4.Crustacean Biology Laboratory, Department of ZoologyBharathiar UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations