Advertisement

Methodologies for the Bioenrichment of Plankton

  • N. Manickam
  • P. Santhanam
  • S. Balakrishnan
  • T. Muralisankar
  • T. Veeramani
  • A. Shenbaga Devi
  • P. Saravana Bhavan
Chapter

Abstract

Aquaculture is expanding worldwide to meet the protein requirements of humans. The basic requirement in culture practice is seed production, while the major constraint is larval nutrition (Imelda 2003). Larviculture—specifically, the initiation of feeding in early larval stages—is a major bottleneck for the industrial scale-up of fish and shellfish cultures. Larval survival also varies with the type of organism, with a rate of <10% in finfish, <1% in mud crabs, <20–40% in shrimp and <20% in molluscs. Evolutionarily, most fish and crustacean larvae are motile prey organisms and encounter problems with the initiation of inert/dry diets. Even if they accept the diets, their poor enzymatic activity and non-functional stomachs will not allow them to digest the existing formulated diets (Pedersen et al. 1987; Pedersen and Hjelmeland 1988; Agh and Sorgeloos 2005). Thus, improving the acceptance of dry diets for fish larvae and formulating more digestible and less polluting diets are important tasks for aquaculturists. The challenge in larval nutrition lies in the fact that live feeds are not completely replaced in hatchery operations. Therefore, once this is achieved, live food (phytoplankton and zooplankton) will remain an important food source for the starting of feeding in the early larval stages. Among the important starter feeds used in larviculture are newly hatched nauplii of Artemia and rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. The successful development of commercial hatcheries and farms has been made possible by several improvements in the production techniques of this live food (Candreva et al. 1996; Dehasque et al. 1998; Agh and Sorgeloos 2005). When compared to rotifers and Artemia nauplii, the traditional live feeds provided to marine fish larvae, copepods can improve larval growth and survival and the ratio of normally pigmented juveniles when fed either alone or as a supplement (Kraul 1983; McEvoy et al. 1998; Nanton and Castell 1999). Thus, the ability to culture these organisms at a scale adequate for marine larviculture would present a major step forward for the production of many marine species that require a better suited diet nutritionally than that provided by the traditional live prey (Josianna and Stottup 2006). It is believed that the optimal formulations for the first feeding of larvae should simulate the yolk composition and, to some extent, reflect the nutrient requirements and metabolic capacities of pre-feeding finfish and shellfish of other organisms (Imelda 2003).

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the authorities of Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli-24, Tamil Nadu, India, for providing the necessary facilities. The first author (NM) gratefully acknowledges the SERB, Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India, New Delhi, for financial support through PI/National Post-Doctoral Fellowship (N-PDF) (DST-SERB, file no.: PDF/2016/000738; dated 05.06.2016).

References

  1. Agh, N., and P. Sorgeloos. 2005. Handbook of Protocols and Guidelines for Culture and Enrichment of Live Food for Use in Larviculture, 1–60. Urmia: Artemia & Aquatic Animals Research Center, Urmia University.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, M.V., R. Batty, J.C. Navarro, J.R. Sargent, and J.R. Dick. 1995. Dietary deficiency of docosahexaenoic acid impairs vision at low light intensities in juvenile herring (Clupea harengus L.). Lipids 30: 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Candreva, P., P. Dhert, A. Novelli, and D. Brissi. 1996. Potential gains through alimentation nutrition improvements in the hatchery. In Seabass and Seabream Culture: Problems and Prospects. European Aquaculture Society, ed. B. Chatain, M. Sargalia, J. Sweetman, and P. Lavens, vol. 388, 148–159. An international workshop, 16–18 October 1996, Verona, Italy.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, L. 1997. Application of multivariate analysis in nutritional evaluation of Artemia. Marine Science Bulletin 16: 66–75.Google Scholar
  5. Coutteau, P., I. Geurden, M.R. Camara, P. Bergot, and P. Sorgeloos. 1997. Review on the dietary effects of phospholipids in fish and crustacean larviculture. Aquaculture 155: 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dehasque, M., T. DeWolf, P. Candreva, P. Coutteau, and P. Sorgeloos. 1998. Control of bacterial input through the live food in marine fish hatcheries. In Aquaculture and Water: Fish Culture, Shellfish Culture and Water Usage, ed. H. Grizel and P. Kestemont, 66–67. Abstracts of contributions presented at the International Conference Aquaculture Europe’ 98, Bordeaux, France, October 7–10, 1998. European Aquaculture Society, Oostende.Google Scholar
  7. Dhert, P., P. Lavens, M. Duray, and P. Sorgeloos. 1990. Improved larval survival at metamorphosis of Asian seabass Lates calcarifer using-3 HUFA-enriched live food. Aquaculture 128: 315–333.Google Scholar
  8. Dhert, P., P. Sorgeloos, and B. Devresse. 1993. Contributions towards a specific DHA enrichment in the live food Brachionus plicatilis and Artemia sp. In Fish Farming Technology, ed. H. Reinertsen, L.A. Dahle, L. Jorgensen, and K. Tvinnereim, 109–115. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  9. Dhert, P., P. Divanach, M. Kentouri, and P. Sorgeloos. 1998. Rearing techniques for difficult marine fish larvae. World Aquaculture March: 48–55.Google Scholar
  10. Estevez, A., L.A. McEvoy, J.G. Bell, and J.R. Sargent. 1999. Growth, survival, lipid composition and pigmentation of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) larvae fed live-prey enriched in Arachidonic and Eicosapentaenoic acids. Aquaculture 180: 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foscarini, R. 1988. Intensive farming procedure for red sea bream (Pagrus major) in Japan. Aquaculture 72: 191–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamada, K., A. Hagiwara, and K. Hirayama. 1993. Use of preserved diet for rotifer Brachionus plicatilis resting egg formation. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 59: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han, K., I. Guerden, and P. Sorgeloss. 2000. Enrichment strategies for Artemia using emulsions providing different levels of n-3 HUFA. Aquaculture 183: 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Imelda, J. 2003. Bioencapsulation of Live Feeds. Technical Paper-19, Course manual, ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi, India, 1–6.Google Scholar
  15. Josianna G Stottup. 2006. A Review on the status and progress in rearing copepods for marine Larviculture. Advantages and Disadvantages. Among Calanoid, Harpacticoid and Cyclopoid copepods. (Eds.) Suarez, L.E.C., R.D. Marie, M.T. Salazar, M. G. N. Lopez, D. A. V. Cavazos, A. C. P. Cruz A.G. Ortega, Avances en Nutricion acuicola VIII. VIII Simposium International de Nutricion Acuicola. Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey., ISBN. 970-694-333-5.Google Scholar
  16. Kanazawa, A. 1993. Nutritional mechanisms involved in the occurrence of abnormal pigmentation in hatchery-reared flatfish. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 24: 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kraul, S. 1983. Results and hypotheses for the propagation of the grey mullet, Mugil cephalus L. Aquaculture 30: 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leger, P., D.A. Bengtson, K.L. Simpson, and P. Sorgeloos. 1986. The use and nutritional value of Artemia as a food source. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 24: 521–623.Google Scholar
  19. Leger, Ph., E. Naessens-Foucquaert, and P. Sorgeloos. 1987. International study on Artemia XXXV. Techniques to manipulate the fatty acid profile in Artemia nauplii and the effect on its nutritional effectiveness for the marine crustacean Mysidopsis bahia M. In Artemia Research and Its Applications, Vol. 3. Ecology, Culturing, Use in Aquaculture, ed. P. Sorgeloos, D.A. Bengtson, W. Decleir, and E. Jaspers, 411–424. Wetteren: Universa Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lovell, T. 1990. Variation in quality of Artemia for feeding larval fish. Aquaculture Magazine 16: 77–78.Google Scholar
  21. Lubzens, E., A. Marko, and A. Tietz. 1985. De novo synthesis of fatty acids in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Aquaculture 47: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lubzens, E., O. Gibson, O. Zmora, and A. Sukenik. 1995. Potential advantages of frozen algae (Nannochloropsis sp.) for rotifer (Brachionus plicatilis) culture. Aquaculture 133: 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McEvoy, L.A., J.C. Navarro, J.G. Bell, and J.R. Sargent. 1995. Autoxidation of oil emulsions during the Artemia enrichment process. Aquaculture 134: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McEvoy, L.A., J.C. Navarro, F. Hontario, F. Amat, and J.R. Sargent. 1996. Two novel Artemia enrichment diets containing polar lipid. Aquaculture 144: 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McEvoy, L., T. Naess, J.G. Bell, and O. Lie. 1998. Lipid and fatty acid composition of normal and malpigmented Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) fed enriched Artemia: a comparison with fry fed wild copepods. Aquaculture 163: 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merchie, G., P. Lavens, and P. Sorgeloos. 1997. Optimization of dietary vitamin C in fish and crustacean larvae: a review. Aquaculture 155: 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miki, N., T. Taniguchi, H. Hamakawa, Y. Yamada, and N. Sakurai. 1990. Reduction of albinism in hatchery-reared flounder “hirame”, Paralichthys olivaceus by feeding on rotifer enriched with vitamin A. Sui San-Zoshosku 38: 147–155.Google Scholar
  28. Mourente, G., A. Rodriguez, D.R. Tocher, and J.R. Sargent. 1993. Effects of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3) on lipid and fatty acid compositions and growth in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae during first feeding. Aquaculture 112: 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nanton, D.A., and J.D. Castell. 1999. The effects of temperature and dietary fatty acid on the fatty acid composition of harpacticoid copepods, for use as a live food for marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 175: 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olivotto, I., A. Rollo, R. Sulpizio, M. Avella, L. Tosti, and O. Carnevali. 2006. Breeding and rearing the Sunrise Dottyback Pseudochromis flavivertex: The importance of live prey enrichment during larval development. Aquaculture 255: 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ozkizilick, S., and F.E. Chu. 1994. Uptake and metabolism of liposomes by Artemia nauplii. Aquaculture 128: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pedersen, B.H., and K. Hjelmeland. 1988. Fate of typsin and assimilation efficiency in larval herring (Clupea harengus) following digestion of copepods. Marine Biology 97: 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pedersen, B.H., E.M. Nilssen, and K. Hjelmeland. 1987. Variations in the content of trypsin and trypsinogen in larval herring (Clupea harengus) digesting copepod nauplii. Marine Biology 94: 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reitan, K.I., J.R. Rainuzzo, and Y. Olsen. 1994. Influence of lipid composition of live feed on growth, survival and pigmentation of turbot larvae. Aquaculture International 2: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sargent, J.R., J.G. Bell, M.V. Bell, R.J. Henderson, and D.R. Tocher. 1995. Requirement criteria for essential fatty acids. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 11: 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sargent, J.R., J.G. Bell, L.A. McEvoy, D.R. Tocher, and A. Estevez. 1999. Recent developments in the essential fatty acid nutrition of fish. Aquaculture 177: 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seixas, P., A. Otero, L.M.P. Valente, J. Dias, and M. Rey-Mendez. 2010. Growth and fatty acid composition of Octopus vulgaris paralarvae fed with enriched Artemia or co-fed with an inert diet. Aquaculture International 18: 1121–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Southgate, P.C., and D.C. Lou. 1995. Improving the n-3 HUFA composition of Artemia using microcapsules containing marine oil. Aquaculture 134: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stottrup, J.G., and Y. Attramadal. 1992. The influence of different rotifer and Artemia enrichment diets on growth, survival and pigmentation in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) larvae. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 23: 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sukenik, A., O. Zmora, and Y. Carmeli. 1993. Biochemical quality of marine unicellular algae with special emphasis on lipid composition. II. Nannochloropsis sp. Journal of Aquaculture 117: 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tocher, D.R., and J.R. Sargent. 1987. The effect of calcium ionophore A23187 on the metabolism of arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acid in neutrophils from a marine teleost fish rich in (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 67: 733–739.Google Scholar
  42. Van Stappen, G. 1996. Introduction, biology and ecology of artemia. In Manual on the Production and Use of Live Food for Aquaculture, FAO Fisheries technical paper 361, ed. P. Lavens and P. Sorgeloos, 79–163. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  43. Watanabe, T. 1979. Nutritional Quality of Living Feeds Used in Seed Production of Fish. Proceedings of the 7th Japan-Soviet Joint Symposium on Aquaculture, Sept 1978, Tokyo, 49–66.Google Scholar
  44. Watanabe, T., and V. Kiron. 1994. Prospects in larval fish dietetics. Aquaculture 124: 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watanabe, T., F. Oowa, C. Kitajima, and S. Fujita. 1980. Relationship between dietary value of brine shrimp Artemia salina and their content of v3 highly unsaturated fatty acids. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 46: 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yamasaki, T., T. Aki, Y. Mori, and T. Yamamoto. 2007. Nutritional enrichment of larval fish feed with thraustochytrid producing polyunsaturated fatty acids and xanthophylls. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 104: 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Manickam
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Santhanam
    • 3
  • S. Balakrishnan
    • 4
    • 5
  • T. Muralisankar
    • 6
  • T. Veeramani
    • 3
  • A. Shenbaga Devi
    • 3
  • P. Saravana Bhavan
    • 6
  1. 1.Marine Planktonology and Aquaculture Laboratory, Department of Marine Science, School of Marine SciencesBharathidasan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  2. 2.Crustacean Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, School of Life SciencesBharathiar UniversityCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Marine Planktonology and Aquaculture Laboratory, Department of Marine ScienceBharathidasan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  4. 4.Marine Planktonology & Aquaculture Laboratory, Department of Marine Science, School of Marine SciencesBharathidasan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  5. 5.Marine Aquarium & Regional CentreZoological Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Govt. of IndiaDighaIndia
  6. 6.Department of Zoology, School of Life SciencesBharathiar UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations